Web API Routing - api/{controller}/{action}/{id} "dysfunctions" api/{controller}/{id}

asp.netRoutingControllerasp.net Web-ApiAction

asp.net Problem Overview


I have the default Route in Global.asax:

 RouteTable.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
         name: "DefaultApi",
         routeTemplate: "api/{controller}/{id}",
         defaults: new { id = System.Web.Http.RouteParameter.Optional }
         );

I wanted to be able to target a specific function, so I created another route:

RouteTable.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
         name: "WithActionApi",
         routeTemplate: "api/{controller}/{action}/{id}",
         defaults: new { id = System.Web.Http.RouteParameter.Optional }
         );

So, in my controller, I have:

    public string Get(int id)
    {
        return "object of id id";
    }        
    
    [HttpGet]
    public IEnumerable<string> ByCategoryId(int id)
    {
        return new string[] { "byCategory1", "byCategory2" };
    }

Calling .../api/records/bycategoryid/5 will give me what I want. However, calling .../api/records/1 will give me the error

>Multiple actions were found that match the request: ...

I understand why that is - the routes just define what URLs are valid, but when it comes to function matching, both Get(int id) and ByCategoryId(int id) match api/{controller}/{id}, which is what confuses the framework.

What do I need to do to get the default API route to work again, and keep the one with {action}? I thought of creating a different controller named RecordByCategoryIdController to match the default API route, for which I would request .../api/recordbycategoryid/5. However, I find that to be a "dirty" (thus unsatisfactory) solution. I've looked for answers on this and no tutorial out there on using a route with {action} even mentions this issue.

asp.net Solutions


Solution 1 - asp.net

The route engine uses the same sequence as you add rules into it. Once it gets the first matched rule, it will stop checking other rules and take this to search for controller and action.

So, you should:

  1. Put your specific rules ahead of your general rules(like default), which means use RouteTable.Routes.MapHttpRoute to map "WithActionApi" first, then "DefaultApi".

  2. Remove the defaults: new { id = System.Web.Http.RouteParameter.Optional } parameter of your "WithActionApi" rule because once id is optional, url like "/api/{part1}/{part2}" will never goes into "DefaultApi".

  3. Add an named action to your "DefaultApi" to tell the route engine which action to enter. Otherwise once you have more than one actions in your controller, the engine won't know which one to use and throws "Multiple actions were found that match the request: ...". Then to make it matches your Get method, use an ActionNameAttribute.

So your route should like this:

// Map this rule first
RouteTable.Routes.MapRoute(
	 "WithActionApi",
	 "api/{controller}/{action}/{id}"
 );
		 
RouteTable.Routes.MapRoute(
	"DefaultApi",
	"api/{controller}/{id}",
	new { action="DefaultAction", id = System.Web.Http.RouteParameter.Optional }
);

And your controller:

[ActionName("DefaultAction")] //Map Action and you can name your method with any text
public string Get(int id)
{
	return "object of id id";
}        

[HttpGet]
public IEnumerable<string> ByCategoryId(int id)
{
	return new string[] { "byCategory1", "byCategory2" };
}

Solution 2 - asp.net

You can solve your problem with help of Attribute routing

Controller

[Route("api/category/{categoryId}")]
public IEnumerable<Order> GetCategoryId(int categoryId) { ... }

URI in jquery

api/category/1

Route Configuration

using System.Web.Http;

namespace WebApplication
{
    public static class WebApiConfig
    {
        public static void Register(HttpConfiguration config)
        {
            // Web API routes
            config.MapHttpAttributeRoutes();

            // Other Web API configuration not shown.
        }
    }
}

and your default routing is working as default convention-based routing

Controller

public string Get(int id)
    {
        return "object of id id";
    }   

URI in Jquery

/api/records/1 

Route Configuration

public static class WebApiConfig
{
    public static void Register(HttpConfiguration config)
    {
        // Attribute routing.
        config.MapHttpAttributeRoutes();

        // Convention-based routing.
        config.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
            name: "DefaultApi",
            routeTemplate: "api/{controller}/{id}",
            defaults: new { id = RouteParameter.Optional }
        );
    }
}

Review article for more information Attribute routing and onvention-based routing here & this

Solution 3 - asp.net

Try this.

public class WebApiConfig
{
    public static void Register(HttpConfiguration config)
    {
        // Web API configuration and services

        var json = config.Formatters.JsonFormatter;
        json.SupportedMediaTypes.Add(new System.Net.Http.Headers.MediaTypeHeaderValue("application/json"));
        config.Formatters.Remove(config.Formatters.XmlFormatter);

        // Web API routes
        config.MapHttpAttributeRoutes();

        config.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
            name: "DefaultApi",
            routeTemplate: "api/{controller}/{action}/{id}",
            defaults: new { id = RouteParameter.Optional , Action =RouteParameter.Optional }
            
        );
    }
}

Solution 4 - asp.net

The possible reason can also be that you have not inherited Controller from ApiController. Happened with me took a while to understand the same.

Solution 5 - asp.net

To differentiate the routes, try adding a constraint that id must be numeric:

RouteTable.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
         name: "DefaultApi",
         routeTemplate: "api/{controller}/{id}",
         constraints: new { id = @"\d+" }, // Only matches if "id" is one or more digits.
         defaults: new { id = System.Web.Http.RouteParameter.Optional }
         );  

          

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionMickael CarusoView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - asp.netChris LiView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - asp.netMSTdevView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - asp.netAmitView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - asp.netParitosh TiwariView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - asp.netDerek WadeView Answer on Stackoverflow