If I have ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION already, can I omit ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION?
AndroidGeolocationAndroid PermissionsAndroid Problem Overview
I have a GPS app that already requests ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION
permission in the manifest, now I want to add a library (MoPub) that requires ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION
.
Am I correct in assuming that ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION
is enough, and I can leave out ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION
from my manifest?
Android Solutions
Solution 1 - Android
https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/location/strategies.html#Permission
>Note: If you are using both NETWORK_PROVIDER and GPS_PROVIDER, then you need to request only the ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION permission, because it includes permission for both providers. (Permission for ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION includes permission only for NETWORK_PROVIDER.)
In short: yes, you don't need ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION
if you've already defined ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION
.
Solution 2 - Android
Depends on your need.
Permission wise, ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION
includes ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION
. However, there is a catch:
ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION
gives you last-known location which is battery friendly
https://developer.android.com/training/location/retrieve-current.html#setup
For example, if your app does something like location-based recommendations, last-known location is good enough.
This has a dependency on Google Play Services
However, if you need something like live/ real-time location like Pokemon Go, use ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION
It gives you live/ real-time location. You'll need to use a LocationListener
Last time I checked, this does not require Google Play Services
Solution 3 - Android
Update
> On Android 12 (API level 31) or higher, users can request that your app retrieve only approximate location information, even when your app requests the ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION runtime permission. > > To handle this potential user behavior, don't request the ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION permission by itself. Instead, request both the ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION permission and the ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION permission in a single runtime request. If you try to request only ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION, the system ignores the request on some releases of Android 12.
Check this url: https://developer.android.com/training/location/permissions#approximate-request
Solution 4 - Android
Difference:
https://developer.android.com/training/location/permissions#accuracy https://developer.android.com/training/location/permissions#approximate-request
You need to ask for both permissions.
> Approximate > Provides an estimate of the device's location, to within about 1 mile (1.6 km). Your app uses this level of location accuracy when you > declare the ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION permission but not the > ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION permission. Precise > Provides an estimate of the device's location that is as accurate as possible, usually within about 160 feet (50 meters) and sometimes > as accurate as within 10 feet (a few meters) or better. Your app uses > this level of location accuracy when you declare the > ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION permission. > > If the user grants the approximate location permission, your app only > has access to approximate location, regardless of which location > permissions your app declares. > > Your app should still work when the user grants only approximate > location access. If a feature in your app absolutely requires access > to precise location using the ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION permission, you can > ask the user to allow your app to access precise location. ``
Then in Android 12 permission changes > On Android 12 (API level 31) or higher, users can request that your > app retrieve only approximate location information, even when your app > requests the ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION runtime permission. > > To handle this potential user behavior, don't request the > ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION permission by itself. Instead, request both the > ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION permission and the ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION > permission in a single runtime request. If you try to request only > ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION, the system ignores the request on some releases > of Android 12.