How to get Rails.logger printing to the console/stdout when running rspec?

Ruby on-RailsLoggingRspecConsoleStdout

Ruby on-Rails Problem Overview


Same as title: How to get Rails.logger printing to the console/stdout when running rspec? Eg.

Rails.logger.info "I WANT this to go to console/stdout when rspec is running"
puts "Like how the puts function works"

I still want Rails.logger to go to log/test.log too.

Ruby on-Rails Solutions


Solution 1 - Ruby on-Rails

For Rails 4.x the log level is configured a bit different than in Rails 3.x

Add this to config/environment/test.rb

# Enable stdout logger
config.logger = Logger.new(STDOUT)

# Set log level
config.log_level = :ERROR

The logger level is set on the logger instance from config.log_level at: https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/v4.2.4/railties/lib/rails/application/bootstrap.rb#L70

Environment variable

As a bonus, you can allow overwriting the log level using an environment variable with a default value like so:

# default :ERROR
config.log_level = ENV.fetch("LOG_LEVEL", "ERROR")

And then running tests from shell:

# Log level :INFO (the value is uppercased in bootstrap.rb)
$ LOG_LEVEL=info rake test

# Log level :ERROR
$ rake test

Solution 2 - Ruby on-Rails

For Rails 4, see this answer.

For Rails 3.x, configure a logger in config/environments/test.rb:

config.logger = Logger.new(STDOUT)
config.logger.level = Logger::ERROR

This will interleave any errors that are logged during testing to STDOUT. You may wish to route the output to STDERR or use a different log level instead.

Sending these messages to both the console and a log file requires something more robust than Ruby's built-in Logger class. The logging gem will do what you want. Add it to your Gemfile, then set up two appenders in config/environments/test.rb:

logger = Logging.logger['test']
logger.add_appenders(
    Logging.appenders.stdout,
    Logging.appenders.file('example.log')
)
logger.level = :info
config.logger = logger

Solution 3 - Ruby on-Rails

Tail the log as a background job (&) and it will interleave with rspec output.

tail -f log/test.log &
bundle exec rspec

Solution 4 - Ruby on-Rails

A solution that I like, because it keeps rspec output separate from actual rails log output, is to do the following:

  • Open a second terminal window or tab, and arrange it so that you can see both the main terminal you're running rspec on as well as the new one.
  • Run a tail command in the second window so you see the rails log in the test environment. By default this can be like $ tail -f $RAILS_APP_DIR/logs/test.log or tail -f $RAILS_APP_DIR\logs\test.log for Window users
  • Run your rspec suites

If you are running a multi-pane terminal like iTerm, this becomes even more fun and you have rspec and the test.log output side by side.

Solution 5 - Ruby on-Rails

You can define a method in spec_helper.rb that sends a message both to Rails.logger.info and to puts and use that for debugging:

def log_test(message)
    Rails.logger.info(message)
    puts message
end

Solution 6 - Ruby on-Rails

I had similar problem in rails 5.0. My api/request specs did not output errors into console, but into log/test.log file. Other test types were outputting errors to console normally.

Changing config.action_dispatch.show_exceptions to false fixed the problem:

# config/environments/test.rb
config.action_dispatch.show_exceptions = false

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
Questions12chungView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - Ruby on-RailsThomas B HomburgView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - Ruby on-RailsPhil CalvinView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - Ruby on-RailsJared BeckView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - Ruby on-RailsShyam HabarakadaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - Ruby on-RailsmanglewoodView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - Ruby on-Railsmario199View Answer on Stackoverflow