Why JSF calls getters multiple times

PerformanceJsfElGetter

Performance Problem Overview


Let's say I specify an outputText component like this:

<h:outputText value="#{ManagedBean.someProperty}"/>

If I print a log message when the getter for someProperty is called and load the page, it is trivial to notice that the getter is being called more than once per request (twice or three times is what happened in my case):

DEBUG 2010-01-18 23:31:40,104 (ManagedBean.java:13) - Getting some property
DEBUG 2010-01-18 23:31:40,104 (ManagedBean.java:13) - Getting some property

If the value of someProperty is expensive to calculate, this can potentially be a problem.

I googled a bit and figured this is a known issue. One workaround was to include a check and see if it had already been calculated:

private String someProperty;

public String getSomeProperty() {
    if (this.someProperty == null) {
        this.someProperty = this.calculatePropertyValue();
    }
    return this.someProperty;
}

The main problem with this is that you get loads of boilerplate code, not to mention private variables that you might not need.

What are the alternatives to this approach? Is there a way to achieve this without so much unnecessary code? Is there a way to stop JSF from behaving in this way?

Thanks for your input!

Performance Solutions


Solution 1 - Performance

This is caused by the nature of deferred expressions #{} (note that "legacy" standard expressions ${} behave exactly the same when Facelets is used instead of JSP). The deferred expression is not immediately evaluated, but created as a ValueExpression object and the getter method behind the expression is executed everytime when the code calls ValueExpression#getValue().

This will normally be invoked one or two times per JSF request-response cycle, depending on whether the component is an input or output component (learn it here). However, this count can get up (much) higher when used in iterating JSF components (such as <h:dataTable> and <ui:repeat>), or here and there in a boolean expression like the rendered attribute. JSF (specifically, EL) won't cache the evaluated result of the EL expression at all as it may return different values on each call (for example, when it's dependent on the currently iterated datatable row).

Evaluating an EL expression and invoking a getter method is a very cheap operation, so you should generally not worry about this at all. However, the story changes when you're performing expensive DB/business logic in the getter method for some reason. This would be re-executed everytime!

Getter methods in JSF backing beans should be designed that way that they solely return the already-prepared property and nothing more, exactly as per the Javabeans specification. They should not do any expensive DB/business logic at all. For that the bean's @PostConstruct and/or (action)listener methods should be used. They are executed only once at some point of request-based JSF lifecycle and that's exactly what you want.

Here is a summary of all different right ways to preset/load a property.

public class Bean {
    
    private SomeObject someProperty;
    
    @PostConstruct
    public void init() {
        // In @PostConstruct (will be invoked immediately after construction and dependency/property injection).
        someProperty = loadSomeProperty();
    }

    public void onload() {
        // Or in GET action method (e.g. <f:viewAction action>).
        someProperty = loadSomeProperty();
    }           

    public void preRender(ComponentSystemEvent event) {
        // Or in some SystemEvent method (e.g. <f:event type="preRenderView">).
        someProperty = loadSomeProperty();
    }           

    public void change(ValueChangeEvent event) {
        // Or in some FacesEvent method (e.g. <h:inputXxx valueChangeListener>).
        someProperty = loadSomeProperty();
    }

    public void ajaxListener(AjaxBehaviorEvent event) {
        // Or in some BehaviorEvent method (e.g. <f:ajax listener>).
        someProperty = loadSomeProperty();
    }

    public void actionListener(ActionEvent event) {
        // Or in some ActionEvent method (e.g. <h:commandXxx actionListener>).
        someProperty = loadSomeProperty();
    }

    public String submit() {
        // Or in POST action method (e.g. <h:commandXxx action>).
        someProperty = loadSomeProperty();
        return "outcome";
    }

    public SomeObject getSomeProperty() {
        // Just keep getter untouched. It isn't intented to do business logic!
        return someProperty;
    }

}

Note that you should not use bean's constructor or initialization block for the job because it may be invoked multiple times if you're using a bean management framework which uses proxies, such as CDI.

If there are for you really no other ways, due to some restrictive design requirements, then you should introduce lazy loading inside the getter method. I.e. if the property is null, then load and assign it to the property, else return it.

    public SomeObject getSomeProperty() {
        // If there are really no other ways, introduce lazy loading.
        if (someProperty == null) {
            someProperty = loadSomeProperty();
        }

        return someProperty;
    }

This way the expensive DB/business logic won't unnecessarily be executed on every single getter call.

###See also:

Solution 2 - Performance

With JSF 2.0 you can attach a listener to a system event

<h:outputText value="#{ManagedBean.someProperty}">
   <f:event type="preRenderView" listener="#{ManagedBean.loadSomeProperty}" />
</h:outputText>

Alternatively you can enclose the JSF page in an f:view tag

<f:view>
   <f:event type="preRenderView" listener="#{ManagedBean.loadSomeProperty}" />

      .. jsf page here...

<f:view>

Solution 3 - Performance

I have written an article about how to cache JSF beans getter with Spring AOP.

I create a simple MethodInterceptor which intercepts all methods annotated with a special annotation:

public class CacheAdvice implements MethodInterceptor {

private static Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(CacheAdvice.class);

@Autowired
private CacheService cacheService;

@Override
public Object invoke(MethodInvocation methodInvocation) throws Throwable {

    String key = methodInvocation.getThis() + methodInvocation.getMethod().getName();

    String thread = Thread.currentThread().getName();

    Object cachedValue = cacheService.getData(thread , key);

    if (cachedValue == null){
        cachedValue = methodInvocation.proceed();
        cacheService.cacheData(thread , key , cachedValue);
        logger.debug("Cache miss " + thread + " " + key);
    }
    else{
        logger.debug("Cached hit " + thread + " " + key);
    }
    return cachedValue;
}


public CacheService getCacheService() {
    return cacheService;
}
public void setCacheService(CacheService cacheService) {
    this.cacheService = cacheService;
}

}

This interceptor is used in a spring configuration file:

    <bean id="advisor" class="org.springframework.aop.support.DefaultPointcutAdvisor">
    <property name="pointcut">
        <bean class="org.springframework.aop.support.annotation.AnnotationMatchingPointcut">
            <constructor-arg index="0"  name="classAnnotationType" type="java.lang.Class">
                <null/>
            </constructor-arg>
            <constructor-arg index="1" value="com._4dconcept.docAdvance.jsfCache.annotation.Cacheable" name="methodAnnotationType" type="java.lang.Class"/>
        </bean>
    </property>
    <property name="advice">
        <bean class="com._4dconcept.docAdvance.jsfCache.CacheAdvice"/>
    </property>
</bean>

Hope it will help!

Solution 4 - Performance

Originally posted in PrimeFaces forum @ http://forum.primefaces.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=29546

Recently, I have been obsessed evaluating the performance of my app, tuning JPA queries, replacing dynamic SQL queries with named queries, and just this morning, I recognized that a getter method was more of a HOT SPOT in Java Visual VM than the rest of my code (or majority of my code).

Getter method:

PageNavigationController.getGmapsAutoComplete()

Referenced by ui:include in in index.xhtml

Below, you will see that PageNavigationController.getGmapsAutoComplete() is a HOT SPOT (performance issue) in Java Visual VM. If you look further down, on the screen capture, you will see that getLazyModel(), PrimeFaces lazy datatable getter method, is a hot spot too, only when enduser is doing a lot of 'lazy datatable' type of stuff/operations/tasks in the app. :)

Java Visual VM: showing HOT SPOT

See (original) code below.

public Boolean getGmapsAutoComplete() {
    switch (page) {
        case "/orders/pf_Add.xhtml":
        case "/orders/pf_Edit.xhtml":
        case "/orders/pf_EditDriverVehicles.xhtml":
            gmapsAutoComplete = true;
            break;
        default:
            gmapsAutoComplete = false;
            break;
    }
    return gmapsAutoComplete;
}

Referenced by the following in index.xhtml:

<h:head>
    <ui:include src="#{pageNavigationController.gmapsAutoComplete ? '/head_gmapsAutoComplete.xhtml' : (pageNavigationController.gmaps ? '/head_gmaps.xhtml' : '/head_default.xhtml')}"/>
</h:head>

Solution: since this is a 'getter' method, move code and assign value to gmapsAutoComplete prior to method being called; see code below.

/*
 * 2013-04-06 moved switch {...} to updateGmapsAutoComplete()
 *            because performance = 115ms (hot spot) while
 *            navigating through web app
 */
public Boolean getGmapsAutoComplete() {
    return gmapsAutoComplete;
}

/*
 * ALWAYS call this method after "page = ..."
 */
private void updateGmapsAutoComplete() {
    switch (page) {
        case "/orders/pf_Add.xhtml":
        case "/orders/pf_Edit.xhtml":
        case "/orders/pf_EditDriverVehicles.xhtml":
            gmapsAutoComplete = true;
            break;
        default:
            gmapsAutoComplete = false;
            break;
    }
}

Test results: PageNavigationController.getGmapsAutoComplete() is no longer a HOT SPOT in Java Visual VM (doesn't even show up anymore)

Sharing this topic, since many of the expert users have advised junior JSF developers to NOT add code in 'getter' methods. :)

Solution 5 - Performance

If you are using CDI, you can use Producers methods. It will be called many times, but the result of first call is cached in scope of the bean and is efficient for getters that are computing or initializing heavy objects! See here, for more info.

Solution 6 - Performance

You could probably use AOP to create some sort of Aspect that cached the results of our getters for a configurable amount of time. This would prevent you from needing to copy-and-paste boilerplate code in dozens of accessors.

Solution 7 - Performance

> If the value of someProperty is > expensive to calculate, this can > potentially be a problem.

This is what we call a premature optimization. In the rare case that a profiler tells you that the calculation of a property is so extraordinarily expensive that calling it three times rather than once has a significant performance impact, you add caching as you describe. But unless you do something really stupid like factoring primes or accessing a databse in a getter, your code most likely has a dozen worse inefficiencies in places you've never thought about.

Solution 8 - Performance

I would also advice using such Framework as Primefaces instead of stock JSF, they address such issues before JSF team e. g in primefaces you can set partial submit. Otherwise BalusC has explained it well.

Solution 9 - Performance

It still big problem in JSF. Fo example if you have a method isPermittedToBlaBla for security checks and in your view you have rendered="#{bean.isPermittedToBlaBla} then the method will be called multiple times.

The security check could be complicated e.g . LDAP query etc. So you must avoid that with

Boolean isAllowed = null ... if(isAllowed==null){...} return isAllowed?

and you must ensure within a session bean this per request.

Ich think JSF must implement here some extensions to avoid multiple calls (e.g annotation @Phase(RENDER_RESPONSE) calle this method only once after RENDER_RESPONSE phase...)

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionSevasView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - PerformanceBalusCView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - PerformanceCésar AlfordeView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - PerformanceNicolas LabrotView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - PerformanceHowardView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - PerformanceMehdiView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - Performancematt bView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - PerformanceMichael BorgwardtView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - PerformanceMartin KarariView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - PerformanceMoradView Answer on Stackoverflow