What's the difference between "squash" and "fixup" in Git/Git Extension?

GitGit ExtensionsSquashFixupDifference

Git Problem Overview


I've been using Git Extensions for a while now (it's awesome!) but I haven't found a simple answer to the following:

Sometimes, when typing a commit message, a make a typo. My friend showed me how to fix it the following way (in Git Extentions):

> Right-Click on the commit > Advanced > Fixup commit

enter image description here

Then I simply check the box "Amend" and rewrite my message and voila! My commit message is fixed.

However this other option "Squash commit"... I have always wondered what it does?!

My question is:

Would someone simply explain me what is the exact difference between Squash commit and Fixup commit in Git/Git Extentions? They look kind of... "similar" to me: enter image description here enter image description here

Git Solutions


Solution 1 - Git

I do not know what Git Extensions does with it specifically, but git rebase has an option to automatically squash or fixup commits with squash! or fixup! prefixes, respectively:

   --autosquash, --no-autosquash
       When the commit log message begins with "squash! ..." (or "fixup!
       ..."), and there is a commit whose title begins with the same ...,
       automatically modify the todo list of rebase -i so that the commit
       marked for squashing comes right after the commit to be modified,
       and change the action of the moved commit from pick to squash (or
       fixup).

The difference between squash and fixup is that during the rebase, the squash operation will prompt you to combine the messages of the original and the squash commit, whereas the fixup operation will keep the original message and discard the message from the fixup commit.

Solution 2 - Git

Simply put, when rebasing a series of commits, each commit marked as a squash, gives you the opportunity to use its message as part of a pick or reword commit message.

When you use fixup the message from that commit is discarded.

Solution 3 - Git

If the question is what's the difference between squash and fixup in git when doing git rebase --interactive, then the answer is the commit message.

> s, squash <commit> = use commit, but meld into previous commit > > f, fixup <commit> = like "squash", but discard this commit's log message


For example:

pick 22a4667 father commit message
squash 46d7c0d child commit message # case 1
# fixup 46d7c0d child commit message # case 2

The commit message after rebasing in case 1 would be:

father commit message

child commit message

while the commit message in case 2 is:

father commit message
# no sub messages

Solution 4 - Git

From git-rebase doc, "interactive mode" section: >If you want to fold two or more commits into one, replace the command "pick" for the second and subsequent commits with "squash" or "fixup". If the commits had different authors, the folded commit will be attributed to the author of the first commit. The suggested commit message for the folded commit is the concatenation of the commit messages of the first commit and of those with the "squash" command, but omits the commit messages of commits with the "fixup" command.

Solution 5 - Git

Both squash and fixup will allow code changes to be introduced by their respective diff's. (not normally mentioned)

The distinction between squash and fixup is in how the commit messages are treated.

In the fixup case the original commit message is kept, unchanged, and any text within the fixup commit message is ignored (unceremoniously dumped).

In the squash case both commit messages are combined ('melded'), one after the other, and offered to the user's editor, so that they can be amalgamated/fused together as desired by the user.

The initial combined message (squash) will contain comment marks showing where the messages start and end. Multiple squash and fixups can be applied.

The terminology can be confusing when discussing small code corrections (without need to change the message) as often one may suggest that the code is 'squeezed' in, when a squash isn't actually required.

Solution 6 - Git

I tinkered with git extensions and couldn't get it to squash many commits into one. To do that, I had to resort to the command line and found this post helpful

git rebase -i Head~2

This is interactive rebase, and note the following:

  • ~2 here refers to how many commits you want to involve in this operation, including the current head
  • You have to edit the subsquent interactive edit window, leave the first item as "pick" and replace subsequent lines with "squash". The instructions in the link above are much clearer if this is opaque.

Solution 7 - Git

Why not ask git itself? When you rebase with git-bash, it says:

pick 512b1d7 (some comment)
# Rebase 621b2e4..512b1d7 onto 621b2e4 (1 command)
#
# Commands:
# p, pick <commit> = use commit
# r, reword <commit> = use commit, but edit the commit message
# e, edit <commit> = use commit, but stop for amending
# s, squash <commit> = use commit, but meld into previous commit
# f, fixup <commit> = like "squash", but discard this commit's log message
# x, exec <command> = run command (the rest of the line) using shell
# d, drop <commit> = remove commit
# l, label <label> = label current HEAD with a name
# t, reset <label> = reset HEAD to a label
# m, merge [-C <commit> | -c <commit>] <label> [# <oneline>]
# .       create a merge commit using the original merge commit's
# .       message (or the oneline, if no original merge commit was
# .       specified). Use -c <commit> to reword the commit message.
#
# These lines can be re-ordered; they are executed from top to bottom.
#
# If you remove a line here THAT COMMIT WILL BE LOST.
D:/code/fenixito-legacy-api/.git/rebase-merge/git-rebase-todo [unix] (11:57 23/10/2019)                                         1,1 start
"D:/code/xxx/.git/rebase-merge/git-rebase-todo" [UNIX] 27L, 1170C

So you see: > s, squash = use commit, but meld into previous commit > > f, fixup = like "squash", but discard this commit's log message

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionPlaceholderView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - GitdrizzdView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - GitocodoView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - GitLoi Nguyen HuynhView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - GitPaulo LieuthierView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - GitPhilip OakleyView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - GitBraveNewMathView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - GitWesternGunView Answer on Stackoverflow