What is the correct way to check if a global variable exists?

JavascriptGlobal VariablesJslint

Javascript Problem Overview


JSLint is not passing this as a valid code:

/* global someVar: false */
if (typeof someVar === "undefined") {
    var someVar = "hi!";
}

What is the correct way?

Javascript Solutions


Solution 1 - Javascript

/*global window */

if (window.someVar === undefined) {
    window.someVar = 123456;
}

if (!window.hasOwnProperty('someVar')) {
    window.someVar = 123456;
}

Solution 2 - Javascript

/**
 * @param {string} nameOfVariable
 */
function globalExists(nameOfVariable) {
    return nameOfVariable in window
}

It doesn't matter whether you created a global variable with var foo or window.foo — variables created with var in global context are written into window.

Solution 3 - Javascript

If you are wanting to assign a global variable only if it doesn't already exist, try:

window.someVar = window.someVar || 'hi';

or

window['someVar'] = window['someVar'] || 'hi';

Solution 4 - Javascript

try

variableName in window

or

typeof window[variableName] != 'undefined'

or

window[variableName] !== undefined

or

window.hasOwnProperty(variableName)

Solution 5 - Javascript

I think this is actually a problem with JSLint. It will issue the following error:

> Unexpected 'typeof'. Compare directly with 'undefined'.

I believe this is bad advice. In JavaScript, undefined is a global variable that is, usually, undefined. But some browsers allow scripts to modify it, like this: window.undefined = 'defined'. If this is the case, comparing directly with undefined can lead to unexpected results. Fortunately, current ECMA 5 compliant browsers do not allow assignments to undefined (and will throw an exception in strict mode).

I prefer typeof someVar === "undefined", as you posted, or someVar in window as Susei suggested.

Solution 6 - Javascript

> if (typeof someVar === "undefined") { > var someVar = "hi!"; > }

will check if someVar (local or global) is undefined.

If you want to check for a global variable you can use

if(window['someVar'] === undefined) {
    ...
}

assuming this is in a browser :)

Solution 7 - Javascript

bfavaretto is incorrect.

Setting the global undefined to a value will not alter tests of objects against undefined. Try this in your favorite browsers JavaScript console:

var udef; var idef = 42;
alert(udef === undefined); // Alerts "true".
alert(idef === undefined); // Alerts "false".
window.undefined = 'defined';
alert(udef === undefined); // Alerts "true".
alert(idef === undefined); // Alerts "false".

This is simply due to JavaScript ignoring all and any values attempted to be set on the undefined variable.

window.undefined = 'defined';
alert(window.undefined); // Alerts "undefined".

Solution 8 - Javascript

This would be a simple way to perform the check .

But this check would fail if variableName is declared and is assigned with the boolean value: false

if(window.variableName){

}

Solution 9 - Javascript

As of ES6 most of other answers, including the accepted answer, are incorrect, because global variables defined by let or const, or resulting from a class declaration, do not have corresponding properties on the global object (window in a browser, or global in node.js). Several of them—mainly the ones which use typeof—can also be fooled by global variables which exist but which are set to undefined.

The only fully general way to test to see if a global variable exists—regardless of whether it has been declared using var, let or const, created via a function or class declaration, created by assignment (i.e., myVar = value at the top level of a program without any declaration for myVar) or by creating a property on the global object (i.e., window.myVar = value)—is to attempt to access it via a global eval and see if TypeError is thrown.

(This builds on an idea presented by Ferran Maylinch, but with a trick to ensure that it will work properly even when encapsulated in a function.)

function globalExists(varName) {
  // Calling eval by another name causes evalled code to run in a
  // subscope of the global scope, rather than the local scope.
  const globalEval = eval;
  try {
    globalEval(varName);
    return true;
  } catch (e) {
    return false;
  }
}

undeclared = undefined;
const myConst = undefined;
let myLet;
var myVar;

globalExists('undeclared')    // => true
globalExists('myConst')       // => true
globalExists('myLet')         // => true
globalExists('myVar')         // => true
globalExists('nonexistent')   // => false
globalExists('globalExists')  // => true - can see itself.
globalExists('varName')       // => false - not fooled by own parameters.
globalExists('globalEval')    // => false - not fooled by local variable.

Note that this makes use of eval, so all the usual caveats apply: you should not supply an untrusted value as the parameter, and if you must use an untrusted value you should check to make sure that varName is a valid JavaScript identifier. Doing so is out of scope for this question, but it can be done using a (rather complex) regular expression—just beware that the correct regexp depends on the version of ECMAScript you are using, whether the code is a script or (ES6) module, whether it is in an async function, etc. etc.

Solution 10 - Javascript

I think the best solution is the following:

if(window.hasOwnProperty('foo')) {
    console.log('Variable is not declared');
}

The following solution will not work if the variables is declared but is not assigned (var foo;).

typeof foo === 'undefined'

Solution 11 - Javascript

If you are not sure whether a global variable is defined, you can always try accessing it and see what happens.

function node_env(name) {
    try {
        return process.env[name];
    } catch (ignore) {}
}

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionEbrahim ByagowiView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - JavascriptbigoldbruteView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - JavascriptgvlasovView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - JavascriptmrakView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - Javascriptgion_13View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - JavascriptbfavarettoView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - JavascriptVatevView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - JavascriptMichaelView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - JavascriptPrem AnandView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - JavascriptcpcallenView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 10 - JavascriptArthur RubensView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 11 - JavascriptdiachedelicView Answer on Stackoverflow