Remove a symlink to a directory

LinuxFileSymlink

Linux Problem Overview


I have a symlink to an important directory. I want to get rid of that symlink, while keeping the directory behind it.

I tried rm and get back rm: cannot remove 'foo'.
I tried rmdir and got back rmdir: failed to remove 'foo': Directory not empty
I then progressed through rm -f, rm -rf and sudo rm -rf

Then I went to find my back-ups.

Is there a way to get rid of the symlink with out throwing away the baby with the bathwater?

Linux Solutions


Solution 1 - Linux

# this works:
rm foo
# versus this, which doesn't:
rm foo/

Basically, you need to tell it to delete a file, not delete a directory. I believe the difference between rm and rmdir exists because of differences in the way the C library treats each.

At any rate, the first should work, while the second should complain about foo being a directory.

If it doesn't work as above, then check your permissions. You need write permission to the containing directory to remove files.

Solution 2 - Linux

use the "unlink" command and make sure not to have the / at the end

$ unlink mySymLink

> unlink() deletes a name from the file system. If that name was the last link to a file and no processes have the file open the file is deleted and the space it was using is made available for reuse. If the name was the last link to a file but any processes still have the file open the file will remain in existence until the last file descriptor referring to it is closed.

I think this may be problematic if I'm reading it correctly.

> If the name referred to a symbolic link the link is removed. > > If the name referred to a socket, fifo or device the name for it is removed but processes which have the object open may continue to use it.

https://linux.die.net/man/2/unlink

Solution 3 - Linux

rm should remove the symbolic link.

skrall@skrall-desktop:~$ mkdir bar
skrall@skrall-desktop:~$ ln -s bar foo
skrall@skrall-desktop:~$ ls -l foo
lrwxrwxrwx 1 skrall skrall 3 2008-10-16 16:22 foo -> bar
skrall@skrall-desktop:~$ rm foo
skrall@skrall-desktop:~$ ls -l foo
ls: cannot access foo: No such file or directory
skrall@skrall-desktop:~$ ls -l bar
total 0
skrall@skrall-desktop:~$ 

Solution 4 - Linux

Use rm symlinkname but do not include a forward slash at the end (do not use: rm symlinkname/). You will then be asked if you want to remove the symlink, y to answer yes.

Solution 5 - Linux

Assuming it actually is a symlink,

$ rm -d symlink

It should figure it out, but since it can't we enable the latent code that was intended for another case that no longer exists but happens to do the right thing here.

Solution 6 - Linux

If rm cannot remove a symlink, perhaps you need to look at the permissions on the directory that contains the symlink. To remove directory entries, you need write permission on the containing directory.

Solution 7 - Linux

Assuming your setup is something like: ln -s /mnt/bar ~/foo, then you should be able to do a rm foo with no problem. If you can't, make sure you are the owner of the foo and have permission to write/execute the file. Removing foo will not touch bar, unless you do it recursively.

Solution 8 - Linux

I also had the same problem. So I suggest to try unlink <absolute path>.

For example unlink ~/<USER>/<SOME OTHER DIRECTORY>/foo.

Solution 9 - Linux

On CentOS, just run rm linkname and it will ask to "remove symbolic link?". Type Y and Enter, the link will be gone and the directory be safe.

Solution 10 - Linux

I had this problem with MinGW (actually Git Bash) running on a Windows Server. None of the above suggestions seemed to work. In the end a made a copy of the directory in case then deleted the soft link in Windows Explorer then deleted the item in the Recycle Bin. It made noises like it was deleting the files but didn't. Do make a backup though!

Solution 11 - Linux

you can use unlink in the folder where you have created your symlink

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionMatthew ScoutenView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - LinuxMatthew ScharleyView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - LinuxJoe PhillipsView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - LinuxSteve KView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - LinuxDeeEss09View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - LinuxJoshuaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - LinuxGreg HewgillView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - LinuxTJ LView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - Linuxrubel MazumderView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - LinuxYuriView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 10 - LinuxKeith WhittinghamView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 11 - LinuxR. PandeyView Answer on Stackoverflow