postgresql duplicate key violates unique constraint

Postgresql

Postgresql Problem Overview


I have a question I know this was posted many times but I didn't find an answer to my problem. The problem is that I have a table and a column "id" I want it to be unique number just as normal. This type of column is serial and the next value after each insert is coming from a sequence so everything seems to be all right but it still sometimes shows this error. I don't know why. In the documentation, it says the sequence is foolproof and always works. If I add a UNIQUE constraint to that column will it help? I worked before many times on Postres but this error is showing for me for the first time. I did everything as normal and I never had this problem before. Can you help me to find the answer that can be used in the future for all tables that will be created? Let's say we have something easy like this:

CREATE TABLE comments
(
  id serial NOT NULL,
  some_column text NOT NULL,
  CONSTRAINT id_pkey PRIMARY KEY (id)
)
WITH (
  OIDS=FALSE
);
ALTER TABLE interesting.comments OWNER TO postgres;

If i add:

ALTER TABLE comments ADD CONSTRAINT id_id_key UNIQUE(id)

Will if be enough or is there some other thing that should be done?

Postgresql Solutions


Solution 1 - Postgresql

This article explains that your sequence might be out of sync and that you have to manually bring it back in sync.

An excerpt from the article in case the URL changes:

> If you get this message when trying to insert data into a PostgreSQL > database: > > ERROR: duplicate key violates unique constraint > > That likely means that the primary key sequence in the table you're > working with has somehow become out of sync, likely because of a mass > import process (or something along those lines). Call it a "bug by > design", but it seems that you have to manually reset the a primary > key index after restoring from a dump file. At any rate, to see if > your values are out of sync, run these two commands: > > > SELECT MAX(the_primary_key) FROM the_table;
SELECT nextval('the_primary_key_sequence'); > > If the first value is higher than the second value, your sequence is > out of sync. Back up your PG database (just in case), then run this command: > > > SELECT setval('the_primary_key_sequence', (SELECT MAX(the_primary_key) FROM the_table)+1); > > That will set the sequence to the next available value that's higher > than any existing primary key in the sequence.

Solution 2 - Postgresql

Intro

I also encountered this problem and the solution proposed by @adamo was basically the right solution. However, I had to invest a lot of time in the details, which is why I am now writing a new answer in order to save this time for others.

Case

My case was as follows: There was a table that was filled with data using an app. Now a new entry had to be inserted manually via SQL. After that the sequence was out of sync and no more records could be inserted via the app.

Solution

As mentioned in the answer from @adamo, the sequence must be synchronized manually. For this purpose the name of the sequence is needed. For Postgres, the name of the sequence can be determined with the command PG_GET_SERIAL_SEQUENCE. Most examples use lower case table names. In my case the tables were created by an ORM middleware (like Hibernate or Entity Framework Core etc.) and their names all started with a capital letter.

In an e-mail from 2004 (link) I got the right hint.

(Let's assume for all examples, that Foo is the table's name and Foo_id the related column.)

Command to get the sequence name:

SELECT PG_GET_SERIAL_SEQUENCE('"Foo"', 'Foo_id');

So, the table name must be in double quotes, surrounded by single quotes.

1. Validate, that the sequence is out-of-sync
SELECT CURRVAL(PG_GET_SERIAL_SEQUENCE('"Foo"', 'Foo_id')) AS "Current Value", MAX("Foo_id") AS "Max Value" FROM "Foo";

When the Current Value is less than Max Value, your sequence is out-of-sync.

2. Correction
SELECT SETVAL((SELECT PG_GET_SERIAL_SEQUENCE('"Foo"', 'Foo_id')), (SELECT (MAX("Foo_id") + 1) FROM "Foo"), FALSE);

Solution 3 - Postgresql

For future searchs, use ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING.

Solution 4 - Postgresql

Referrence - https://www.calazan.com/how-to-reset-the-primary-key-sequence-in-postgresql-with-django/

I had the same problem try this: python manage.py sqlsequencereset table_name

Eg:

python manage.py sqlsequencereset auth

you need to run this in production settings(if you have) and you need Postgres installed to run this on the server

Solution 5 - Postgresql

The primary key is already protecting you from inserting duplicate values, as you're experiencing when you get that error. Adding another unique constraint isn't necessary to do that.

The "duplicate key" error is telling you that the work was not done because it would produce a duplicate key, not that it discovered a duplicate key already commited to the table.

Solution 6 - Postgresql

> Replace the table_name to your actual name of the table.

  1. Gives the current last id for the table. Note it that for next step.
SELECT MAX(id) FROM table_name;  

  1. Get the next id sequence according to postgresql. Make sure this id is higher than the current max id we get from step 1
SELECT nextVal('"table_name_id_seq"');
  1. if it's not higher than then use this step 3 to update the next sequence.
SELECT setval('"table_name_id_seq"', (SELECT MAX(id) FROM table_name)+1);

Solution 7 - Postgresql

From http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/interactive/datatype.html

Note: Prior to PostgreSQL 7.3, serial implied UNIQUE. This is no longer automatic. If you wish a serial column to be in a unique constraint or a primary key, it must now be specified, same as with any other data type.

Solution 8 - Postgresql

In my case carate table script is:

CREATE TABLE public."Survey_symptom_binds"
(
    id integer NOT NULL DEFAULT nextval('"Survey_symptom_binds_id_seq"'::regclass),
    survey_id integer,
    "order" smallint,
    symptom_id integer,
    CONSTRAINT "Survey_symptom_binds_pkey" PRIMARY KEY (id)
)

SO:

SELECT nextval('"Survey_symptom_binds_id_seq"'::regclass),
       MAX(id) 
  FROM public."Survey_symptom_binds"; 
  
SELECT nextval('"Survey_symptom_binds_id_seq"'::regclass) less than MAX(id) !!!

Try to fix the proble:

SELECT setval('"Survey_symptom_binds_id_seq"', (SELECT MAX(id) FROM public."Survey_symptom_binds")+1);

Good Luck every one!

Solution 9 - Postgresql

I had the same problem. It was because of the type of my relations. I had a table property which related to both states and cities. So, at first I had a relation from property to states as OneToOne, and the same for cities. And I had the same error "duplicate key violates unique constraint". That means that: I can only have one property related to one state and city. But that doesnt make sense, because a city can have multiple properties. So the problem is the relation. The relation should be ManyToOne. Many properties to One city

Solution 10 - Postgresql

Table name started with a capital letter if tables were created by an ORM middleware (like Hibernate or Entity Framework Core etc.)

SELECT setval('"Table_name_Id_seq"', (SELECT MAX("Id") FROM "Table_name") + 1)
WHERE
    NOT EXISTS (
        SELECT *
        FROM  (SELECT CURRVAL(PG_GET_SERIAL_SEQUENCE('"Table_name"', 'Id')) AS seq, MAX("Id") AS max_id
               FROM "Table_name") AS seq_table
        WHERE seq > max_id
    )

Solution 11 - Postgresql

For programatically solution at Django. Based on Paolo Melchiorre's answer, I wrote a chunk as a function to be called before any .save()

from django.db import connection
def setSqlCursor(db_table):
    sql = """SELECT pg_catalog.setval(pg_get_serial_sequence('"""+db_table+"""', 'id'), MAX(id)) FROM """+db_table+""";"""
    with connection.cursor() as cursor:
        cursor.execute(sql)

Solution 12 - Postgresql

I have similar problem but I solved it by removing all the foreign key in my Postgresql

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionredView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - PostgresqladamoView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - PostgresqlSommerEngineeringView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - PostgresqlrafaelnaskarView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - PostgresqlKevalView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - PostgresqlStephen DenneView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - PostgresqlSalmanView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - PostgresqlstackerView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - PostgresqlAlmat AzhenovView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - Postgresqllila montenegroView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 10 - PostgresqlIgorView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 11 - PostgresqlRaphael FernandesView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 12 - Postgresqluser14161795View Answer on Stackoverflow