Javadoc: package.html or package-info.java

JavaJavadoc

Java Problem Overview


When trying to create package level Javadoc comments, whats the preferred method? What do you do?

package-info.java

  • Pros
  • Newer
  • Cons
  • Abuse of a class - Classes are for code, not for only comments

package.html

  • Pros
  • HTML extension means its not code
  • Syntax highlighting in IDE's/text editors
  • Cons
  • None?

For me, I've always used Package.html. But I'm wondering if its the correct choice.

Java Solutions


Solution 1 - Java

package-info.java: "This file is new in JDK 5.0, and is preferred over package.html."—javadoc - The Java API Documentation Generator

Addendum: The big difference seems to be package annotations. There's a little more in the way of rationale in 7.4 Package Declarations.

Addendum: The annotation feature is also mentioned here and here.

Addendum: See also What’s package-info.java for?.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionTheLQView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - JavatrashgodView Answer on Stackoverflow