Is it okay to use babel-node in production

Javascriptnode.jsBrowserifyBabeljs

Javascript Problem Overview


I have been developing a site using babel-node and browserify with the babelify transform, to support ES6 syntax.

I am just wondering, can I run this in production as babel-node server rather than node server What other options do I have to run ES6 in node?

Here are the commands I am running for build and start in development

// npm run build
browserify -t [babelify] client.js > public/js/bundle.js",

// npm start
babel-node server.js"

Here are my dev dependencies

"babel": "^4.0.1",
"babelify": "^5.0.3",
"browserify": "^8.0.3"

Javascript Solutions


Solution 1 - Javascript

For the client side code, you're doing the correct thing. babelify it and ship it to the client.


For the server side code, I would just do a regular build using babel-cli

> According to <http://babeljs.io/docs/setup/#babel_register>;, babel-register is not meant for production use — The require hook is primarily recommended for simple cases.

for Babel 6+

As of Babel 6, no transformations are included by default. So let's start by installing babel-cli and babel-preset-es2015.

$ npm install --save-dev babel-cli babel-preset-es2015

Add a transformation to your .babelrc file — this is the prest module we downloaded above. Take a look at the full list of presets to see which one(s) are a best fit for you.

{
  "presets": ["es2015"]
}

Add a build script to your package.json. Below src is your input files and build is the transformed output files

"scripts": {
  "build": "babel src -d build"
}

Then build it!

$ npm run build

Then run your code. At this point, you'll want to be executing the files in your build directory

$ npm start

for Babel <= 5, just use the require hook.

require("babel/register");

> All subsequent files required by node with the extensions .es6, .es, .jsx and .js will be transformed by Babel. The polyfill is also automatically required.

You will be able to keep your source files in ES6 but still execute them using node server.js


According to your comments, you seem to be having a little trouble. Pay particular attention to the yellow highlighted part above. Your first file can only be ES5, which is run by node itself. All subsequent requires will be transformed by Babel...

Here's what a typical setup might look like

server.js

// only ES5 is allowed in this file
require("babel/register");

// other babel configuration, if necessary

// load your app
var app = require("./app.js");

app.js

// this file will be loaded through babel
// you can now use ES6 here and in every other include

fire it up!

$ node server.js

Solution 2 - Javascript

I just wrote a blog post on this topic

Babeljs CLI documentation warns the following:

> babel-node not meant for production use > > You should not be using babel-node in production. It is unnecessarily > heavy, with high memory usage due to the cache being stored in memory. > You will also always experience a startup performance penalty as the > entire app needs to be compiled on the fly.

This is an example of how you could set up the npm scripts to run your app with node instead of babel-node.

"scripts": {
  "clean": "rm -rf build && mkdir build",
  "build-css": "node-sass scss/app.scss public/css/app.css",
  "build-server": "babel -d ./build ./server -s",
  "build": "npm run clean && npm run build-css && npm run build-server",
  "lint": "eslint source/ --quiet",
  "start": "node ./build/index.js",
  "debug": "node --debug ./build/index.js",
  "test": "for i in $(ls tests/); do babel-node \"./tests/${i}\" | faucet ; done",
  "validate": "npm run lint; npm run test && npm outdated --depth 0"
},

You can find more details on the blog post

Solution 3 - Javascript

It's important to weigh the pros and cons of using babel-node in production.

  • babel-node does add between half a second to one second to the startup cost, on commodity hardware. But if your app is a long-running server, that startup cost won't matter much.
  • Try to measure the extra memory consumption. For my app for example (reading and processing time series data), it was only 20MB. Depending on your situation, this may or may not be significant.

On the other hand,

  • using babel-node directly simplifies development - you won't need "build" scripts, and you won't have separate src/lib and dist directories
  • if you import from local files, will you import from src/myutils, or from lib/myutils? Using babel-node eliminates that problem.

I only use Babel for modules support. Now V8 just released support for modules on January 10, 2017. Hopefully we'll see modules support in Node under a flag in a few months, rendering my reason for using Babel moot.

Solution 4 - Javascript

@cuadraman's answer is more accurate than @naomik.

To answer your question briefly: no, babel-node shouldn't be invoked explicitly by you. babel-node is a private library that's consumed by babel-cli.

The official tutorial has everything you need to get up and running on node (not browser-side!): https://github.com/babel/example-node-server. READ IT! I found so many misleading blog tutorials that used round about ways, and found this article the easiest to follow.

Bonus: contrary to what many people think, all of the transpiling magic can be installed locally (using npm install --save-dev babel-cli nodemon babel-preset-es2015 babel-preset-stage-2). No need to install Babel or any of its helper modules globally! Pretty nifty.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionsvnmView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - JavascriptMulanView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - JavascriptcuadramanView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - JavascriptDan DascalescuView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - Javascriptwle8300View Answer on Stackoverflow