Add the `stopOnFailure=&quot;true&quot;` attribute to your `phpunit.xml` root element.

You can also use it in the CLI: `phpunit --stop-on-failure`

Info from manual and some others that are maybe useful for you:

- stopOnError - &quot;Stop execution upon first error.&quot;
- stopOnFailure - &quot;Stop execution upon first error or failure.&quot;
- stopOnIncomplete - &quot;Stop execution upon first incomplete test.&quot;

More info at: [PHPunit manual][1]


  [1]: https://phpunit.de/manual/current/en/textui.html

Recently I have been trying to implement my own security on a log in script I stumbled upon on the internet. After struggling of trying to learn how to make my own script to generate a salt for each user, I stumbled upon `password_hash`. 

From what I understand (based off of the reading on [this page](http://php.net/manual/en/faq.passwords.php)), salt is already generated in the row when you use `password_hash`. Is this true? 

Another question I had was, wouldn&#39;t it be smart to have 2 salts? One directly in the file and one in the DB? That way, if someone compromises your salt in the DB, you still have the one directly in the file? I read on here that storing salts is never a smart idea, but it always confused me what people meant by that. 

How to use PHP&#39;s password_hash to hash and verify passwords

Currently the HTML5 `&lt;datalist&gt;` element is supported in most major browsers (except Safari) and seems like an interesting way to add suggestions to an input.

However, there seem to be some discrepancies between the implementation of the `value` attribute and the inner text on the `&lt;option&gt;`. For example:

    &lt;input list=&quot;answers&quot; name=&quot;answer&quot;&gt;
    &lt;datalist id=&quot;answers&quot;&gt;
      &lt;option value=&quot;42&quot;&gt;The answer&lt;/option&gt;
    &lt;/datalist&gt;

This is handled differently by different browsers:

Chrome and Opera:&lt;br&gt;
![Datalist in Chrome/Opera][1]

FireFox and IE 11:&lt;br&gt;
![Datalist in FireFox][2]

After selecting one, the input is filled with the value and not the inner text. I only want the user to see the text (&quot;The answer&quot;) in the dropdown and in the input, but pass the value `42` on submit, like a `select` would.

How can I make all browsers have the dropdown list show the labels (inner text) of the `&lt;option&gt;`s, but send the `value` attribute when the form is submitted? 


  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/3kdQd.png
  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/qtir4.png

Show datalist labels but submit the actual value

I&#39;m running a large suite of phpunit tests, and I&#39;d like see which test failed as soon as it failed, rather than waiting for all of the tests to complete then having it list out all of the failures.

How can I tell phpunit to do this?

How to tell phpunit to stop on failure

<p>I'm running a large suite of phpunit tests, and I'd like see which test failed as soon as it failed, rather than waiting for all of the tests to complete then having it list out all of the failures.</p>
<p>How can I tell phpunit to do this?</p>


In Laravel v4 I was able to get the current route name using...

&lt;!-- language: php --&gt;

    Route::currentRouteName()

How can I do it in **Laravel v5** and **Laravel v6**?

Laravel: How to Get Current Route Name? (v5 ... v7)

I have a problem running phpMyAdmin. When I try to access phpMyAdmin in my browser, I get the error message: &quot;The mbstring extension is missing. Please check your PHP configuration.&quot;

I have already searched on the internet for possible solutions. According to that, I made some modifications in php.ini file. I uncommented the line &quot;;extension=php_mbstring.dll&quot; and wrote the full path of the ext folder in extension_dir. Sadly, it still doesn&#39;t work.

Could you please help me finding the proper solution.


phpMyAdmin Error: The mbstring extension is missing. Please check your PHP configuration

Im getting this error when I try to save data to mysql using Laravel 5, other forms and save() methods work fine but this one:

    SQLSTATE[42S02]: Base table or view not found: 1146 Table &#39;sistemal5.cotizacions&#39; doesn&#39;t exist (SQL: insert into `cotizacions` (`customer_id`, `total`, `updated_at`, `created_at`) values (1501, 150.69, 2015-05-11 03:16:25, 2015-05-11 03:16:25))

Here is my Controller store method:

    public function store(CotFormRequest $request)
    	{    
    		$quote = new Cotizacion;
    		$quote-&gt;customer_id = Input::get(&#39;data.clientid&#39;);
    		$quote-&gt;total = Input::get(&#39;data.totalAftertax&#39;);    
    		$quote-&gt;save();    
    	}
And here is my model:

    &lt;?php namespace App\Models\Cotizacion;
    
    use Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Model;
    
    
    class Cotizacion extends Model {
    
    }

I must be overlooking something really obvious cause i cant understand why Laravel is adding an &quot;S&quot; the table is cotizacion not cotizacions.

How can i troubleshoot this?


Base table or view not found: 1146 Table Laravel 5

I am trying to run the following migration:

    public function up()
	{
		Schema::create(&#39;lifestyle_questions&#39;, function(Blueprint $table)
		{
			$table-&gt;increments(&#39;id&#39;);
			$table-&gt;string(&#39;question&#39;);
			$table-&gt;timestamps();
		});

		Schema::create(&#39;lifestyle_question_answers&#39;, function(Blueprint $table)
		{
			$table-&gt;increments(&#39;id&#39;);
			$table-&gt;integer(&#39;lifestyle_question_id&#39;)-&gt;unsigned();
			$table-&gt;foreign(&#39;lifestyle_question_id&#39;)-&gt;references(&#39;id&#39;)-&gt;on(&#39;lifestyle_questions&#39;);
			$table-&gt;string(&#39;answer&#39;);
			$table-&gt;timestamps();
		});

		Schema::create(&#39;user_lifestyle_question_answers&#39;, function(Blueprint $table)
		{
			$table-&gt;integer(&#39;user_id&#39;)-&gt;unsigned();
			$table-&gt;foreign(&#39;user_id&#39;)-&gt;references(&#39;id&#39;)-&gt;on(&#39;users&#39;);
			$table-&gt;integer(&#39;lifestyle_question_answer_id&#39;)-&gt;unsigned();
			$table-&gt;foreign(&#39;lifestyle_question_answer_id&#39;)-&gt;references(&#39;id&#39;)-&gt;on(&#39;lifestyle_question_answers&#39;);
		});
	}

But I get the following error:

    [Illuminate\Database\QueryException]
    SQLSTATE[42000]: Syntax error or access violation: 1059 Identifier name &#39;user_lifestyle_question_answers_lifestyle_question_answer_id_foreign&#39; is too long (SQL: alter table `user_lifestyle_question_answers` add constraint user_lifestyle_question_answers_lifestyle_question_answer_id_foreign foreign key (`lifestyle_question_answer_id`) references `lifestyle_question_answers` (`id`))

    [PDOException]
    SQLSTATE[42000]: Syntax error or access violation: 1059 Identifier name &#39;user_lifestyle_question_answers_lifestyle_question_answer_id_foreign&#39; is too long

Laravel 5 migration identifier name too long

With Laravel 5 it seems like method injection for the Request object is preferred over using the Request facade.

    &lt;?php namespace App\Http\Controllers;
    
    use Illuminate\Http\Request;
    
    class HomeController extends Controller
    {
    	public function index(Request $request)
    	{
    		$email = $request-&gt;input(&#39;email&#39;);
    
    		// OR
    
    		$email = $request-&gt;get(&#39;email&#39;);
    	}
    }

A few questions I have:

Is using `Illuminate\Http\Request` better than using `Illuminate\Support\Facades\Request`

I have no idea how $request-&gt;get() is resolving as there is no function name `get()` in `Illuminate\Http\Request`.  input() and get() does the same thing.

Is method injection better than using Facades?



Laravel Request input() or get()

In Java, the programmer can specify expected exceptions for JUnit test cases like this:

    @Test(expected = ArithmeticException.class)
    public void omg()
    {
        int blackHole = 1 / 0;
    }

How would I do this in Kotlin? I have tried two syntax variations, but none of them worked:

    import org.junit.Test

    // ...

    @Test(expected = ArithmeticException) fun omg()
        Please specify constructor invocation;
        classifier &#39;ArithmeticException&#39; does not have a companion object

    @Test(expected = ArithmeticException.class) fun omg()
                                name expected ^
                                                ^ expected &#39;)&#39;


Test expected exceptions in Kotlin

What is the most convenient way to create a specific instance of `Microsoft.SharePoint.SPTimeZone` as the following one:

    SPTimeZone utc = SPRegionalSettings.GlobalTimeZones
		                               .OfType&lt;SPTimeZone&gt;()
		                               .FirstOrDefault(tz =&gt; tz.Information.Bias == 0
                                                       &amp;&amp; tz.Information.DaylightBias == 0);

Is this hack the best one I can get...

This is in particular a problem for me, since I would like to mock this part of code for unit testing and to force it to always return UTC. The property `GlobalTimeZones` seems to depend on `HttpContext.Current` or an actual request - a prerequisite I don&#39;t have in my Unit Tests...

N.B: I know that there is `System.TimeZoneInfo` but a third party assembly forces me into using SPTimeZone ...

Create or get specific SPTimeZone instance

As of Android Studio 1.1rc there&#39;s [Unit testing support][1] and
I&#39;m wondering what&#39;s the difference between Android Instrumentation Tests and Unit tests.&lt;br/&gt;

**As I understand it:**&lt;br/&gt;
*Unit tests* are useful for testing code which doesn&#39;t call the Android
API, and the *Android instrumentation tests* are rather integration
tests to test Android API specific elements or GUI components.
   
However if you use a framework like *Robolectric* or *Mockito* in your
unit tests, you can test Android code (without the need of a device) if I&#39;m not mistaken.

----------
Is this correct, or is there a bigger difference? If so, what&#39;s  the use of each?

 

  [1]: http://tools.android.com/tech-docs/unit-testing-support

Difference between Android Instrumentation test and Unit test in Android Studio?

I tried run Parameterized Unit Test as below in Android Studio.

    import android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.SmallTest;  

    import junit.framework.TestCase;    

    import org.junit.Test;
    import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
    import org.junit.runners.JUnit4;
    import org.junit.runners.Parameterized;
    import org.junit.runners.Parameterized.Parameter;
    import org.junit.runners.Parameterized.Parameters;  

    import java.util.Arrays;
    import java.util.Collection;    

    @RunWith(Parameterized.class)
    @SmallTest
    public class FibonacciTest extends TestCase {
        @Parameters
        public static Collection&lt;Object[]&gt; data() {
            return Arrays.asList(new Object[][] {
                    {0, 0}, {1, 1}, {2, 1}, {3, 2}, {4, 3}, {5, 5}, {6, 8}
            });
        }   

        @Parameter // first data value (0) is default
        public /* NOT private */ int fInput;    

        @Parameter(value = 1)
        public /* NOT private */ int fExpected; 

        @Test
        public void test() {
            assertEquals(fExpected, Fibonacci.calculate(fInput));
        }
    }

The result is error stating No Test Run. However, if I removed the Parameterized, and change them to individual test. It works. Anyone could shed some light why is this not working? Is Parameterized unit test not supported in Android development yet? Thanks!

Below is the error with stack trace.

    FAILURE: Build failed with an exception.
    * What went wrong:
    Execution failed for task &#39;:app:testDebug&#39;.
    &gt; No tests found for given includes: [com.example.......FibonacciTest]
    * Try:
    Run with --info or --debug option to get more log output.
    * Exception is:
    org.gradle.api.tasks.TaskExecutionException: Execution failed for task &#39;:app:testDebug&#39;.
        at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.execution.ExecuteActionsTaskExecuter.executeActions(ExecuteActionsTaskExecuter.java:69)
        at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.execution.ExecuteActionsTaskExecuter.execute(ExecuteActionsTaskExecuter.java:46)
        at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.execution.PostExecutionAnalysisTaskExecuter.execute(PostExecutionAnalysisTaskExecuter.java:35)
        at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.execution.SkipUpToDateTaskExecuter.execute(SkipUpToDateTaskExecuter.java:64)
        at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.execution.ValidatingTaskExecuter.execute(ValidatingTaskExecuter.java:58)
        at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.execution.SkipEmptySourceFilesTaskExecuter.execute(SkipEmptySourceFilesTaskExecuter.java:42)
        at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.execution.SkipTaskWithNoActionsExecuter.execute(SkipTaskWithNoActionsExecuter.java:52)
        at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.execution.SkipOnlyIfTaskExecuter.execute(SkipOnlyIfTaskExecuter.java:53)
        at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.execution.ExecuteAtMostOnceTaskExecuter.execute(ExecuteAtMostOnceTaskExecuter.java:43)
        at org.gradle.api.internal.AbstractTask.executeWithoutThrowingTaskFailure(AbstractTask.java:310)
        at org.gradle.execution.taskgraph.AbstractTaskPlanExecutor$TaskExecutorWorker.executeTask(AbstractTaskPlanExecutor.java:79)
        at org.gradle.execution.taskgraph.AbstractTaskPlanExecutor$TaskExecutorWorker.processTask(AbstractTaskPlanExecutor.java:63)
        at org.gradle.execution.taskgraph.AbstractTaskPlanExecutor$TaskExecutorWorker.run(AbstractTaskPlanExecutor.java:51)
        at org.gradle.execution.taskgraph.DefaultTaskPlanExecutor.process(DefaultTaskPlanExecutor.java:23)
        at org.gradle.execution.taskgraph.DefaultTaskGraphExecuter.execute(DefaultTaskGraphExecuter.java:88)
        at org.gradle.execution.SelectedTaskExecutionAction.execute(SelectedTaskExecutionAction.java:37)
        at org.gradle.execution.DefaultBuildExecuter.execute(DefaultBuildExecuter.java:62)
        at org.gradle.execution.DefaultBuildExecuter.access$200(DefaultBuildExecuter.java:23)
        at org.gradle.execution.DefaultBuildExecuter$2.proceed(DefaultBuildExecuter.java:68)
        at org.gradle.execution.DryRunBuildExecutionAction.execute(DryRunBuildExecutionAction.java:32)
        at org.gradle.execution.DefaultBuildExecuter.execute(DefaultBuildExecuter.java:62)
        at org.gradle.execution.DefaultBuildExecuter.execute(DefaultBuildExecuter.java:55)
        at org.gradle.initialization.DefaultGradleLauncher.doBuildStages(DefaultGradleLauncher.java:149)
        at org.gradle.initialization.DefaultGradleLauncher.doBuild(DefaultGradleLauncher.java:106)
        at org.gradle.initialization.DefaultGradleLauncher.run(DefaultGradleLauncher.java:86)
        at org.gradle.launcher.exec.InProcessBuildActionExecuter$DefaultBuildController.run(InProcessBuildActionExecuter.java:90)
        at org.gradle.tooling.internal.provider.runner.BuildModelActionRunner.run(BuildModelActionRunner.java:54)
        at org.gradle.launcher.exec.ChainingBuildActionRunner.run(ChainingBuildActionRunner.java:35)
        at org.gradle.launcher.exec.InProcessBuildActionExecuter.execute(InProcessBuildActionExecuter.java:41)
        at org.gradle.launcher.exec.InProcessBuildActionExecuter.execute(InProcessBuildActionExecuter.java:28)
        at org.gradle.launcher.daemon.server.exec.ExecuteBuild.doBuild(ExecuteBuild.java:49)
        at org.gradle.launcher.daemon.server.exec.BuildCommandOnly.execute(BuildCommandOnly.java:36)
        at org.gradle.launcher.daemon.server.api.DaemonCommandExecution.proceed(DaemonCommandExecution.java:120)
        at org.gradle.launcher.daemon.server.exec.WatchForDisconnection.execute(WatchForDisconnection.java:37)
        at org.gradle.launcher.daemon.server.api.DaemonCommandExecution.proceed(DaemonCommandExecution.java:120)
        at org.gradle.launcher.daemon.server.exec.ResetDeprecationLogger.execute(ResetDeprecationLogger.java:26)
        at org.gradle.launcher.daemon.server.api.DaemonCommandExecution.proceed(DaemonCommandExecution.java:120)
        at org.gradle.launcher.daemon.server.exec.RequestStopIfSingleUsedDaemon.execute(RequestStopIfSingleUsedDaemon.java:34)
        at org.gradle.launcher.daemon.server.api.DaemonCommandExecution.proceed(DaemonCommandExecution.java:120)
        at org.gradle.launcher.daemon.server.exec.ForwardClientInput$2.call(ForwardClientInput.java:74)
        at org.gradle.launcher.daemon.server.exec.ForwardClientInput$2.call(ForwardClientInput.java:72)
        at org.gradle.util.Swapper.swap(Swapper.java:38)
        at org.gradle.launcher.daemon.server.exec.ForwardClientInput.execute(ForwardClientInput.java:72)
        at org.gradle.launcher.daemon.server.api.DaemonCommandExecution.proceed(DaemonCommandExecution.java:120)
        at org.gradle.launcher.daemon.server.health.DaemonHealthTracker.execute(DaemonHealthTracker.java:47)
        at org.gradle.launcher.daemon.server.api.DaemonCommandExecution.proceed(DaemonCommandExecution.java:120)
        at org.gradle.launcher.daemon.server.exec.LogToClient.doBuild(LogToClient.java:66)
        at org.gradle.launcher.daemon.server.exec.BuildCommandOnly.execute(BuildCommandOnly.java:36)
        at org.gradle.launcher.daemon.server.api.DaemonCommandExecution.proceed(DaemonCommandExecution.java:120)
        at org.gradle.launcher.daemon.server.exec.EstablishBuildEnvironment.doBuild(EstablishBuildEnvironment.java:71)
        at org.gradle.launcher.daemon.server.exec.BuildCommandOnly.execute(BuildCommandOnly.java:36)
        at org.gradle.launcher.daemon.server.api.DaemonCommandExecution.proceed(DaemonCommandExecution.java:120)
        at org.gradle.launcher.daemon.server.health.HintGCAfterBuild.execute(HintGCAfterBuild.java:41)
        at org.gradle.launcher.daemon.server.api.DaemonCommandExecution.proceed(DaemonCommandExecution.java:120)
        at org.gradle.launcher.daemon.server.exec.StartBuildOrRespondWithBusy$1.run(StartBuildOrRespondWithBusy.java:50)
        at org.gradle.launcher.daemon.server.DaemonStateCoordinator$1.run(DaemonStateCoordinator.java:246)
        at org.gradle.internal.concurrent.ExecutorPolicy$CatchAndRecordFailures.onExecute(ExecutorPolicy.java:54)
        at org.gradle.internal.concurrent.StoppableExecutorImpl$1.run(StoppableExecutorImpl.java:40)
    Caused by: org.gradle.api.GradleException: No tests found for given includes: [com.example........FibonacciTest]
        at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.NoMatchingTestsReporter.afterSuite(NoMatchingTestsReporter.java:35)
        at org.gradle.messaging.dispatch.ReflectionDispatch.dispatch(ReflectionDispatch.java:35)
        at org.gradle.messaging.dispatch.ReflectionDispatch.dispatch(ReflectionDispatch.java:24)
        at org.gradle.internal.event.BroadcastDispatch.dispatch(BroadcastDispatch.java:87)
        at org.gradle.internal.event.BroadcastDispatch.dispatch(BroadcastDispatch.java:31)
        at org.gradle.messaging.dispatch.ProxyDispatchAdapter$DispatchingInvocationHandler.invoke(ProxyDispatchAdapter.java:93)
        at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy46.afterSuite(Unknown Source)
        at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.results.TestListenerAdapter.completed(TestListenerAdapter.java:48)
        at org.gradle.messaging.dispatch.ReflectionDispatch.dispatch(ReflectionDispatch.java:35)
        at org.gradle.messaging.dispatch.ReflectionDispatch.dispatch(ReflectionDispatch.java:24)
        at org.gradle.internal.event.BroadcastDispatch.dispatch(BroadcastDispatch.java:87)
        at org.gradle.internal.event.BroadcastDispatch.dispatch(BroadcastDispatch.java:31)
        at org.gradle.messaging.dispatch.ProxyDispatchAdapter$DispatchingInvocationHandler.invoke(ProxyDispatchAdapter.java:93)
        at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy45.completed(Unknown Source)
        at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.results.StateTrackingTestResultProcessor.completed(StateTrackingTestResultProcessor.java:69)
        at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.results.AttachParentTestResultProcessor.completed(AttachParentTestResultProcessor.java:52)
        at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.processors.TestMainAction.run(TestMainAction.java:51)
        at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.detection.DefaultTestExecuter.execute(DefaultTestExecuter.java:75)
        at org.gradle.api.tasks.testing.Test.executeTests(Test.java:527)
        at org.gradle.internal.reflect.JavaMethod.invoke(JavaMethod.java:75)
        at org.gradle.api.internal.project.taskfactory.AnnotationProcessingTaskFactory$StandardTaskAction.doExecute(AnnotationProcessingTaskFactory.java:226)
        at org.gradle.api.internal.project.taskfactory.AnnotationProcessingTaskFactory$StandardTaskAction.execute(AnnotationProcessingTaskFactory.java:219)
        at org.gradle.api.internal.project.taskfactory.AnnotationProcessingTaskFactory$StandardTaskAction.execute(AnnotationProcessingTaskFactory.java:208)
        at org.gradle.api.internal.AbstractTask$TaskActionWrapper.execute(AbstractTask.java:589)
        at org.gradle.api.internal.AbstractTask$TaskActionWrapper.execute(AbstractTask.java:572)
        at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.execution.ExecuteActionsTaskExecuter.executeAction(ExecuteActionsTaskExecuter.java:80)
        at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.execution.ExecuteActionsTaskExecuter.executeActions(ExecuteActionsTaskExecuter.java:61)
        ... 57 more
    BUILD FAILED
    Total time: 4.153 secs
    No tests found for given includes: [com.example......FibonacciTest]


No tests found for given includes Error, when running Parameterized Unit test in Android Studio

I am trying to run an Xcode unit test for my iOS application. I am willing to do it on an iPad connected via USB to a Mac. I am trying to run the test from the command line in order to trigger it from Jenkins later on.

Below is what I&#39;m currently typing into the command line and the error I&#39;m getting. Please help.

The code:

    xcodebuild test -scheme MyApplication -destination &quot;platform=iOS,name=iPad&quot;

The error:

&gt; Scheme MyApplication is not currently configured for the test action

Xcode project scheme is not currently configured for the test action

I want to know if there is a solution on how to unit-test a PHP trait.

I know we can test a class which is using the trait, but I was wondering if there are better approaches.

Thanks for any advice in advance :) 

**EDIT**

One alternative is to use the Trait in the test class itself as I&#39;m going to demonstrate bellow.

**But** I&#39;m not that keen on this approach since there is no guaranty there are no similar method names between the trait, the class and also the `PHPUnit_Framework_TestCase` (in this example):

Here is an example trait:

    trait IndexableTrait
    {
        /** @var int */
        private $index;

        /**
         * @param $index
         * @return $this
         * @throw \InvalidArgumentException
         */
        public function setIndex($index)
        {
            if (false === filter_var($index, FILTER_VALIDATE_INT)) {
                throw new \InvalidArgumentException(&#39;$index must be integer.&#39;);
            }

            $this-&gt;index = $index;

            return $this;
        }

        /**
         * @return int|null
         */
        public function getIndex()
        {
            return $this-&gt;index;
        }
    }

and its test:

    class TheAboveTraitTest extends \PHPUnit_Framework_TestCase
    {
        use TheAboveTrait;

        public function test_indexSetterAndGetter()
        {
            $this-&gt;setIndex(123);
            $this-&gt;assertEquals(123, $this-&gt;getIndex());
        }

        public function test_indexIntValidation()
        {
            $this-&gt;setExpectedException(\Exception::class, &#39;$index must be integer.&#39;);
            $this-&gt;setIndex(&#39;bad index&#39;);
        }
    }

How to unit test PHP traits

I created this array of objects:

    $ad_1 = new AdUnit(array(&#39;id&#39; =&gt; &#39;1&#39;, &#39;name&#39; =&gt; &#39;Ad_1&#39;, &#39;description&#39; =&gt; &#39;great ad&#39;, &#39;code&#39; =&gt; &#39;alpha&#39;, &#39;widget_id&#39; =&gt; &#39;123&#39;));
    $ad_2 = new AdUnit(array(&#39;id&#39; =&gt; &#39;2&#39;, &#39;name&#39; =&gt; &#39;Ad_2&#39;, &#39;description&#39; =&gt; &#39;good ad&#39;, &#39;code&#39; =&gt; &#39;delta&#39;, &#39;widget_id&#39; =&gt; &#39;456&#39;));
    $ad_3 = new AdUnit(array(&#39;id&#39; =&gt; &#39;3&#39;, &#39;name&#39; =&gt; &#39;Ad_3&#39;, &#39;description&#39; =&gt; &#39;bad ad&#39;, &#39;code&#39; =&gt; &#39;sigma&#39;, &#39;widget_id&#39; =&gt; &#39;789&#39;));
    $adUnitArr = array($ad_1, $ad_2, $ad_3);

and i want to check that a random ad i got from a function exists in the array. the code to get the ad looks like this:

			$fixture = new AdGroup();
    $fixture-&gt;setAds($adUnitArr);
    $randad = $fixture-&gt;getRandomAd();

now i want to check if the array contains the random ad i received, what i was able to do like this:

    $this-&gt;assertEquals(in_array($randad, $adUnitArr), 1); //check if ad in array

but my question is, is there an assert or some other way to check this thing better than the way i did it?? i tried using `assertArrayHasKey` but i got the following error:

 

    PHPUnit_Framework_Exception: Argument #1 (No Value) of PHPUnit_Framework_Assert::assertArrayHasKey() must be a integer or string

any idea please? thx

test if array contains value using PHPUnit

In Laravel&#39;s unit test, I can test a JSON API like that:

    $this-&gt;post(&#39;/user&#39;, [&#39;name&#39; =&gt; &#39;Sally&#39;])
        -&gt;seeJson([
            &#39;created&#39; =&gt; true,
        ]);

But what if I want to use the response. How can I get the JSON response (as an array) using `$this-&gt;post()`?

Laravel testing, get JSON content

I would like to use PHPUnit to create code coverage reports. I have tried a lot of installation setups found on the web. But nothing seems to work out.

I use the latest version of Laravel 5 (&gt;5.2) and PHPUnit v. 5.0.10. Further, I use MAMP on Mac OS X 10.9.5 running PHP 7. 

When I run PHPUnit that is integrated in my Laravel distribution, I receive the following error.

    $ vendor/bin/phpunit -v
    PHPUnit 5.0.10 by Sebastian Bergmann and contributors.

    Runtime:       PHP 7.0.0
    Configuration: /Applications/MAMP/htdocs/myProject/phpunit.xml
    Error:         No code coverage driver is available`

My composer file looks like:


	&quot;require-dev&quot;: {
	    &quot;fzaninotto/faker&quot;: &quot;~1.4&quot;,
	    &quot;mockery/mockery&quot;: &quot;0.9.*&quot;,
	    &quot;phpunit/phpunit&quot;: &quot;5.0.*&quot;,
	    &quot;phpunit/php-code-coverage&quot;: &quot;^3&quot;,
	    &quot;symfony/css-selector&quot;: &quot;2.8.*|3.0.*&quot;,
	    &quot;symfony/dom-crawler&quot;: &quot;2.8.*|3.0.*&quot;
	},

I have also tried the following command:

    /Applications/MAMP/bin/php/php7.0.0/bin/phpdbg -qrr ../../../htdocs/myProject/vendor/bin/phpunit -v

This seems to set up the code coverage driver well, but it ends up in an exception:


	$ /Applications/MAMP/bin/php/php7.0.0/bin/phpdbg -qrr ../../../htdocs/myProject/vendor/bin/phpunit -v
	PHPUnit 5.0.10 by Sebastian Bergmann and contributors.

	Runtime:       PHPDBG 7.0.0
	Configuration: /Applications/MAMP/htdocs/myProject/phpunit.xml

	[PHP Fatal error:  Uncaught ErrorException: include(/Applications/MAMP/htdocs/myProject/app/Exceptions/Handler.php): failed to open stream: Too many open files in /Applications/MAMP/htdocs/myProject/vendor/composer/ClassLoader.php:412
	Stack trace:
	...

The phpunit.xml looks as follows:

    &lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot;?&gt;
    &lt;phpunit backupGlobals=&quot;false&quot;
         backupStaticAttributes=&quot;false&quot;
         bootstrap=&quot;bootstrap/autoload.php&quot;
         colors=&quot;true&quot;
         convertErrorsToExceptions=&quot;true&quot;
         convertNoticesToExceptions=&quot;true&quot;
         convertWarningsToExceptions=&quot;true&quot;
         processIsolation=&quot;false&quot;
         stopOnFailure=&quot;false&quot;&gt;
        &lt;testsuites&gt;
            &lt;testsuite name=&quot;Application Test Suite&quot;&gt;
                &lt;directory&gt;./tests/&lt;/directory&gt;
            &lt;/testsuite&gt;
        &lt;/testsuites&gt;
        &lt;logging&gt;
          &lt;log type=&quot;coverage-html&quot; target=&quot;./tests/codeCoverage&quot; charset=&quot;UTF-8&quot;/&gt;
        &lt;/logging&gt;
        &lt;filter&gt;
            &lt;whitelist&gt;
                &lt;directory suffix=&quot;.php&quot;&gt;app/&lt;/directory&gt;
            &lt;/whitelist&gt;
        &lt;/filter&gt;
        &lt;php&gt;
            &lt;env name=&quot;APP_ENV&quot; value=&quot;testing&quot;/&gt;
            &lt;env name=&quot;CACHE_DRIVER&quot; value=&quot;array&quot;/&gt;
            &lt;env name=&quot;SESSION_DRIVER&quot; value=&quot;array&quot;/&gt;
            &lt;env name=&quot;QUEUE_DRIVER&quot; value=&quot;sync&quot;/&gt;
        &lt;/php&gt;
    &lt;/phpunit&gt;


Is it possible to use PHPUnit that comes with the Laravel framework together with code coverage? How should I set it up and use it?

Thanks a lot for your help.

Laravel 5: PHPUnit and no code coverage driver available

I&#39;m new on Symfony and PHPUnit. 

I would like to run some tests, there are a lot of deprecation notices. But it does not matter because I&#39;ll stay on Symfony 2.8 for now. Do you know if it&#39;s possible to remove them?

[![enter image description here][1]][1]

I try to find out by myself, but it&#39;s not working, have you got some ideas for me folks ? 

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/34284480/how-to-remove-the-deprecation-warnings-in-symfony-2-7

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/28850809/disable-deprecated-warning-in-symfony-2-7


  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/w9BSd.png


----------


**EDIT :**

Reference to the answer of @LBA

My screenshot is not really about the error of the AsseticBundle, but about the &quot;Remaining deprecation notices (220)&quot;. I would like to know if there is a flag somewhere to display, or not, these warnings. I would like to just have the result of my test suit. Is that possible?

Content Type	Original Author	Original Content on Stackoverflow
Question	johncorser	View Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - Php	Sven van Zoelen	View Answer on Stackoverflow

How to tell phpunit to stop on failure

Php Problem Overview

Php Solutions

Solution 1 - Php

Show datalist labels but submit the actual value

How to use PHP's password_hash to hash and verify passwords

Attributions