How to sum array of numbers in Ruby?

RubyArraysMathSum

Ruby Problem Overview


I have an array of integers.

For example:

array = [123,321,12389]

Is there any nice way to get the sum of them?

I know, that

sum = 0
array.each { |a| sum+=a }

would work.

Ruby Solutions


Solution 1 - Ruby

For ruby >= 2.4 you can use sum:

array.sum

For ruby < 2.4 you can use inject:

array.inject(0, :+)

Note: the 0 base case is needed otherwise nil will be returned on empty arrays:

> [].inject(:+)
nil
> [].inject(0, :+)
0

Solution 2 - Ruby

Try this:

array.inject(0){|sum,x| sum + x }

See Ruby's Enumerable Documentation

(note: the 0 base case is needed so that 0 will be returned on an empty array instead of nil)

Solution 3 - Ruby

array.reduce(0, :+)

While equivalent to array.inject(0, :+), the term reduce is entering a more common vernacular with the rise of MapReduce programming models.

inject, reduce, fold, accumulate, and compress are all synonymous as a class of folding functions. I find consistency across your code base most important, but since various communities tend to prefer one word over another, it’s nonetheless useful to know the alternatives.

To emphasize the map-reduce verbiage, here’s a version that is a little bit more forgiving on what ends up in that array.

array.map(&:to_i).reduce(0, :+)

Some additional relevant reading:

Solution 4 - Ruby

Alternatively (just for comparison), if you have Rails installed (actually just ActiveSupport):

require 'activesupport'
array.sum

Solution 5 - Ruby

For Ruby >=2.4.0 you can use sum from Enumerables.

[1, 2, 3, 4].sum

It is dangerous to mokeypatch base classes. If you like danger and using an older version of Ruby, you could add #sum to the Array class:

class Array
  def sum
    inject(0) { |sum, x| sum + x }
  end
end

Solution 6 - Ruby

New for Ruby 2.4.0

You can use the aptly named method Enumerable#sum. It has a lot of advantages over inject(:+) but there are some important notes to read at the end as well.

Examples

Ranges
(1..100).sum
#=> 5050
Arrays
[1, 2, 4, 9, 2, 3].sum
#=> 21

[1.9, 6.3, 20.3, 49.2].sum
#=> 77.7

Important note

This method is not equivalent to #inject(:+). For example

%w(a b c).inject(:+)
#=> "abc"
%w(a b c).sum
#=> TypeError: String can't be coerced into Integer

Also,

(1..1000000000).sum
#=> 500000000500000000 (execution time: less than 1s)
(1..1000000000).inject(:+)
#=> 500000000500000000 (execution time: upwards of a minute)

See this answer for more information on why sum is like this.

Solution 7 - Ruby

Ruby 2.4+ / Rails - array.sum i.e. [1, 2, 3].sum # => 6

Ruby pre 2.4 - array.inject(:+) or array.reduce(:+)

*Note: The #sum method is a new addition to 2.4 for enumerable so you will now be able to use array.sum in pure ruby, not just Rails.

Solution 8 - Ruby

Just for the sake of diversity, you can also do this if your array is not an array of numbers, but rather an array of objects that have properties that are numbers (e.g. amount):

array.inject(0){|sum,x| sum + x.amount}

Solution 9 - Ruby

ruby 1.8.7 way is the following:

array.inject(0, &:+) 

Solution 10 - Ruby

Ruby 2.4.0 is released, and it has an Enumerable#sum method. So you can do

array.sum

Examples from the docs:

{ 1 => 10, 2 => 20 }.sum {|k, v| k * v }  #=> 50
(1..10).sum                               #=> 55
(1..10).sum {|v| v * 2 }                  #=> 110

Solution 11 - Ruby

for array with nil values we can do compact and then inject the sum ex-

a = [1,2,3,4,5,12,23.45,nil,23,nil]
puts a.compact.inject(:+)

Solution 12 - Ruby

Also allows for [1,2].sum{|x| x * 2 } == 6:

# http://madeofcode.com/posts/74-ruby-core-extension-array-sum
class Array
  def sum(method = nil, &block)
    if block_given?
      raise ArgumentError, "You cannot pass a block and a method!" if method
      inject(0) { |sum, i| sum + yield(i) }
    elsif method
      inject(0) { |sum, i| sum + i.send(method) }
    else
      inject(0) { |sum, i| sum + i }
    end
  end
end

Solution 13 - Ruby

Method 1:

    [1] pry(main)> [1,2,3,4].sum
    => 10
    [2] pry(main)> [].sum
    => 0
    [3] pry(main)> [1,2,3,5,nil].sum
    TypeError: nil can't be coerced into Integer

Method 2:

   [24] pry(main)> [].inject(:+)
   => nil
   [25] pry(main)> [].inject(0, :+)
   => 0
   [4] pry(main)> [1,2,3,4,5].inject(0, :+)
   => 15
   [5] pry(main)> [1,2,3,4,nil].inject(0, :+)
   TypeError: nil can't be coerced into Integer
   from (pry):5:in `+'

Method 3:

   [6] pry(main)> [1,2,3].reduce(:+)
   => 6
   [9] pry(main)> [].reduce(:+)
   => nil
   [7] pry(main)> [1,2,nil].reduce(:+)
   TypeError: nil can't be coerced into Integer
   from (pry):7:in `+'

Method 4: When Array contains an nil and empty values, by default if you use any above functions reduce, sum, inject everything will through the

> TypeError: nil can't be coerced into Integer

You can overcome this by,

   [16] pry(main)> sum = 0 
   => 0
   [17] pry(main)> [1,2,3,4,nil, ''].each{|a| sum+= a.to_i }
   => [1, 2, 3, 4, nil, ""]
   [18] pry(main)> sum
   => 10

Method 6: eval

Evaluates the Ruby expression(s) in string.

  [26] pry(main)> a = [1,3,4,5]
  => [1, 3, 4, 5]
  [27] pry(main)> eval a.join '+'
  => 13
  [30] pry(main)> a = [1,3,4,5, nil]
  => [1, 3, 4, 5, nil]
  [31] pry(main)> eval a.join '+'
  SyntaxError: (eval):1: syntax error, unexpected end-of-input
  1+3+4+5+

Solution 14 - Ruby

If you feel golfy, you can do

eval [123,321,12389]*?+

This will create a string "123+321+12389" and then use function eval to do the sum. This is only for golfing purpose, you should not use it in proper code.

Solution 15 - Ruby

You can also do it in easy way

def sum(numbers)
  return 0 if numbers.length < 1
  result = 0
  numbers.each { |num| result += num }
  result
end

Solution 16 - Ruby

You can use .map and .sum like:

array.map { |e| e }.sum

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionbrainfckView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - RubyjomeyView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - RubyzenaznView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - RubyEvanView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - RubyMike WoodhouseView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - RubyjrhicksView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - RubyEli SadoffView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - RubytypoView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - RubyHashFailView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - RubyVovaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 10 - RubySanthoshView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 11 - RubythedudecodesView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 12 - RubygrosserView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 13 - RubyNataraja BView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 14 - RubyUlysse BNView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 15 - RubyPrabhakar UndurthiView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 16 - RubyshabdarView Answer on Stackoverflow