How to perform an integer division, and separately get the remainder, in JavaScript?

JavascriptMathModuloInteger Division

Javascript Problem Overview


In JavaScript, how do I get:

  1. The whole number of times a given integer goes into another?
  2. The remainder?

Javascript Solutions


Solution 1 - Javascript

For some number y and some divisor x compute the quotient (quotient) and remainder (remainder) as:

var quotient = Math.floor(y/x);
var remainder = y % x;

Solution 2 - Javascript

I'm no expert in bitwise operators, but here's another way to get the whole number:

var num = ~~(a / b);

This will work properly for negative numbers as well, while Math.floor() will round in the wrong direction.

This seems correct as well:

var num = (a / b) >> 0;

Solution 3 - Javascript

I did some speed tests on Firefox.

-100/3             // -33.33..., 0.3663 millisec
Math.floor(-100/3) // -34,       0.5016 millisec
~~(-100/3)         // -33,       0.3619 millisec
(-100/3>>0)        // -33,       0.3632 millisec
(-100/3|0)         // -33,       0.3856 millisec
(-100-(-100%3))/3  // -33,       0.3591 millisec

/* a=-100, b=3 */
a/b                // -33.33..., 0.4863 millisec
Math.floor(a/b)    // -34,       0.6019 millisec
~~(a/b)            // -33,       0.5148 millisec
(a/b>>0)           // -33,       0.5048 millisec
(a/b|0)            // -33,       0.5078 millisec
(a-(a%b))/b        // -33,       0.6649 millisec

The above is based on 10 million trials for each.

Conclusion: Use (a/b>>0) (or (~~(a/b)) or (a/b|0)) to achieve about 20% gain in efficiency. Also keep in mind that they are all inconsistent with Math.floor, when a/b<0 && a%b!=0.

Solution 4 - Javascript

ES6 introduces the new Math.trunc method. This allows to fix @MarkElliot's answer to make it work for negative numbers too:

var div = Math.trunc(y/x);
var rem = y % x;

Note that Math methods have the advantage over bitwise operators that they work with numbers over 231.

Solution 5 - Javascript

I normally use:

const quotient =  (a - a % b) / b;
const remainder = a % b;

It's probably not the most elegant, but it works.

Solution 6 - Javascript

var remainder = x % y;
return (x - remainder) / y;

Solution 7 - Javascript

You can use the function parseInt to get a truncated result.

parseInt(a/b)

To get a remainder, use mod operator:

a%b

parseInt have some pitfalls with strings, to avoid use radix parameter with base 10

parseInt("09", 10)

In some cases the string representation of the number can be a scientific notation, in this case, parseInt will produce a wrong result.

parseInt(100000000000000000000000000000000, 10) // 1e+32

This call will produce 1 as result.

Solution 8 - Javascript

Math.floor(operation) returns the rounded down value of the operation.

Example of 1st question:

var x = 5;
var y = 10.4;
var z = Math.floor(x + y);

console.log(z);

Console: > 15

Example of 2nd question:

var x = 14;
var y = 5;
var z = Math.floor(x%y);

console.log(x);

Console:

> 4

Solution 9 - Javascript

JavaScript calculates right the floor of negative numbers and the remainder of non-integer numbers, following the mathematical definitions for them.

FLOOR is defined as "the largest integer number smaller than the parameter", thus:

  • positive numbers: FLOOR(X)=integer part of X;
  • negative numbers: FLOOR(X)=integer part of X minus 1 (because it must be SMALLER than the parameter, i.e., more negative!)

REMAINDER is defined as the "left over" of a division (Euclidean arithmetic). When the dividend is not an integer, the quotient is usually also not an integer, i.e., there is no remainder, but if the quotient is forced to be an integer (and that's what happens when someone tries to get the remainder or modulus of a floating-point number), there will be a non-integer "left over", obviously.

JavaScript does calculate everything as expected, so the programmer must be careful to ask the proper questions (and people should be careful to answer what is asked!) Yarin's first question was NOT "what is the integer division of X by Y", but, instead, "the WHOLE number of times a given integer GOES INTO another". For positive numbers, the answer is the same for both, but not for negative numbers, because the integer division (dividend by divisor) will be -1 smaller than the times a number (divisor) "goes into" another (dividend). In other words, FLOOR will return the correct answer for an integer division of a negative number, but Yarin didn't ask that!

gammax answered correctly, that code works as asked by Yarin. On the other hand, Samuel is wrong, he didn't do the maths, I guess, or he would have seen that it does work (also, he didn't say what was the divisor of his example, but I hope it was 3):

Remainder = X % Y = -100 % 3 = -1

GoesInto = (X - Remainder) / Y = (-100 - -1) / 3 = -99 / 3 = -33

By the way, I tested the code on Firefox 27.0.1, it worked as expected, with positive and negative numbers and also with non-integer values, both for dividend and divisor. Example:

-100.34 / 3.57: GoesInto = -28, Remainder = -0.3800000000000079

Yes, I noticed, there is a precision problem there, but I didn't had time to check it (I don't know if it's a problem with Firefox, Windows 7 or with my CPU's FPU). For Yarin's question, though, which only involves integers, the gammax's code works perfectly.

Solution 10 - Javascript

const idivmod = (a, b) => [a/b |0, a%b];

there is also a proposal working on it Modulus and Additional Integer Math

Solution 11 - Javascript

Alex Moore-Niemi's comment as an answer:

For Rubyists here from Google in search of divmod, you can implement it as such:

function divmod(x, y) {
  var div = Math.trunc(x/y);
  var rem = x % y;
  return [div, rem];
}

Result:

// [2, 33]

Solution 12 - Javascript

If you are just dividing with powers of two, you can use bitwise operators:

export function divideBy2(num) {
  return [num >> 1, num & 1];
}

export function divideBy4(num) {
  return [num >> 2, num & 3];
}

export function divideBy8(num) {
  return [num >> 3, num & 7];
}

(The first is the quotient, the second the remainder)

Solution 13 - Javascript

 function integerDivison(dividend, divisor){
    
        this.Division  = dividend/divisor;
        this.Quotient = Math.floor(dividend/divisor);
         this.Remainder = dividend%divisor;
        this.calculate = ()=>{
            return {Value:this.Division,Quotient:this.Quotient,Remainder:this.Remainder};
        }
         
    }

  var divide = new integerDivison(5,2);
  console.log(divide.Quotient)      //to get Quotient of two value 
  console.log(divide.division)     //to get Floating division of two value 
  console.log(divide.Remainder)     //to get Remainder of two value 
  console.log(divide.calculate())   //to get object containing all the values

Solution 14 - Javascript

You can use ternary to decide how to handle positive and negative integer values as well.

var myInt = (y > 0) ? Math.floor(y/x) : Math.floor(y/x) + 1

If the number is a positive, all is fine. If the number is a negative, it will add 1 because of how Math.floor handles negatives.

Solution 15 - Javascript

This will always truncate towards zero. Not sure if it is too late, but here it goes:

function intdiv(dividend, divisor) { 
    divisor = divisor - divisor % 1;
    if (divisor == 0) throw new Error("division by zero");
    dividend = dividend - dividend % 1;
    var rem = dividend % divisor;
    return { 
        remainder: rem, 
        quotient: (dividend - rem) / divisor
    };
}

Solution 16 - Javascript

Calculating number of pages may be done in one step: Math.ceil(x/y)

Solution 17 - Javascript

If you need to calculate the remainder for very large integers, which the JS runtime cannot represent as such (any integer greater than 2^32 is represented as a float and so it loses precision), you need to do some trick.

This is especially important for checking many case of check digits which are present in many instances of our daily life (bank account numbers, credit cards, ...)

First of all you need your number as a string (otherwise you have already lost precision and the remainder does not make sense).

str = '123456789123456789123456789'

You now need to split your string in smaller parts, small enough so the concatenation of any remainder and a piece of string can fit in 9 digits.

digits = 9 - String(divisor).length

Prepare a regular expression to split the string

splitter = new RegExp(`.{1,${digits}}(?=(.{${digits}})+$)`, 'g')

For instance, if digits is 7, the regexp is

/.{1,7}(?=(.{7})+$)/g

It matches a nonempty substring of maximum length 7, which is followed ((?=...) is a positive lookahead) by a number of characters that is multiple of 7. The 'g' is to make the expression run through all string, not stopping at first match.

Now convert each part to integer, and calculate the remainders by reduce (adding back the previous remainder - or 0 - multiplied by the correct power of 10):

reducer = (rem, piece) => (rem * Math.pow(10, digits) + piece) % divisor

This will work because of the "subtraction" remainder algorithm:

n mod d = (n - kd) mod d

which allows to replace any 'initial part' of the decimal representation of a number with its remainder, without affecting the final remainder.

The final code would look like:

function remainder(num, div) {
  const digits = 9 - String(div).length;
  const splitter = new RegExp(`.{1,${digits}}(?=(.{${digits}})+$)`, 'g');
  const mult = Math.pow(10, digits);
  const reducer = (rem, piece) => (rem * mult + piece) % div;

  return str.match(splitter).map(Number).reduce(reducer, 0);
}

Solution 18 - Javascript

Here is a way to do this. (Personally I would not do it this way, but thought it was a fun way to do it for an example)

function intDivide(numerator, denominator) {
  return parseInt((numerator/denominator).toString().split(".")[0]);
}

let x = intDivide(4,5);
let y = intDivide(5,5);
let z = intDivide(6,5);
console.log(x);
console.log(y);
console.log(z);

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionYarinView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - JavascriptMark ElliotView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - Javascriptuser113716View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - JavascriptKalElView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - JavascriptOriolView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - JavascriptWolf ElkanView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - JavascriptgammaxView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - JavascriptÉdipo Costa RebouçasView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - JavascriptAetricityView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - JavascriptCyberknightView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 10 - JavascriptnkitkuView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 11 - JavascriptAlexView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 12 - JavascriptKonstantin MöllersView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 13 - JavascriptSandeep KumarView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 14 - JavascriptJohn GaltView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 15 - JavascriptbzimView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 16 - Javascriptuser1920925View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 17 - JavascriptrewrittenView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 18 - JavascriptDanielView Answer on Stackoverflow