How does grep run so fast?

I am really amazed by the functionality of GREP in shell, earlier I used to use substring method in java but now I use GREP for it and it executes in a matter of seconds, it is blazingly faster than java code that I used to write.(according to my experience I might be wrong though)

That being said I have not been able to figure out how it is happening? there is also not much available on the web.

Can anyone help me with this?

Assuming your question regards GNU grep specifically. Here's a note from the author, Mike Haertel:

> GNU grep is fast because it AVOIDS LOOKING AT EVERY INPUT BYTE. > > GNU grep is fast because it EXECUTES VERY FEW INSTRUCTIONS FOR EACH > BYTE that it > does look at. > > GNU grep uses the well-known Boyer-Moore algorithm, which looks first > for the final letter of the target string, and uses a lookup table to > tell it how far ahead it can skip in the input whenever it finds a > non-matching character. > > GNU grep also unrolls the inner loop of Boyer-Moore, and sets up the > Boyer-Moore delta table entries in such a way that it doesn't need to > do the loop exit test at every unrolled step. The result of this is > that, in the limit, GNU grep averages fewer than 3 x86 instructions > executed for each input byte it actually looks at (and it skips many > bytes entirely). > > GNU grep uses raw Unix input system calls and avoids copying data > after reading it. Moreover, GNU grep AVOIDS BREAKING THE INPUT INTO > LINES. Looking for newlines would slow grep down by a factor of > several times, because to find the newlines it would have to look at > every byte! > > So instead of using line-oriented input, GNU grep reads raw data into > a large buffer, searches the buffer using Boyer-Moore, and only when > it finds a match does it go and look for the bounding newlines > (Certain command line options like > -n disable this optimization.)

This answer is a subset of the information taken from here.

To add to Steve's excellent answer.

It may not be widely known but grep is almost always faster when grepping for a longer pattern-string than a short one, because in a longer pattern, Boyer-Moore can skip forward in longer strides to achieve even better sublinear speeds:

Example:

# after running these twice to ensure apples-to-apples comparison
# (everything is in the buffer cache) 

$ time grep -c 'tg=f_c' 20140910.log
28
0.168u 0.068s 0:00.26

$ time grep -c ' /cc/merchant.json tg=f_c' 20140910.log
28
0.100u 0.056s 0:00.17

The longer form is 35% faster!

How come? Boyer-Moore consructs a skip-forward table from the pattern-string, and whenever there's a mismatch, it picks the longest skip possible (from last char to first) before comparing a single char in the input to the char in the skip table.

Here's a video explaining Boyer Moore (Credit to kommradHomer)

Another common misconception (for GNU grep) is that fgrep is faster than grep. f in fgrep doesn't stand for 'fast', it stands for 'fixed' (see the man page), and since both are the same program, and both use Boyer-Moore, there's no difference in speed between them when searching for fixed-strings without regexp special chars. The only reason I use fgrep is when there's a regexp special char (like ., [], or *) I don't want it to be interpreted as such. And even then the more portable/standard form of grep -F is preferred over fgrep.