How do you create a random string that's suitable for a session ID in PostgreSQL?

PostgresqlRandom

Postgresql Problem Overview


I'd like to make a random string for use in session verification using PostgreSQL. I know I can get a random number with SELECT random(), so I tried SELECT md5(random()), but that doesn't work. How can I do this?

Postgresql Solutions


Solution 1 - Postgresql

You can fix your initial attempt like this:

SELECT md5(random()::text);

Much simpler than some of the other suggestions. :-)

Solution 2 - Postgresql

I'd suggest this simple solution:

This is a quite simple function that returns a random string of the given length:

Create or replace function random_string(length integer) returns text as
$$
declare
  chars text[] := '{0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I,J,K,L,M,N,O,P,Q,R,S,T,U,V,W,X,Y,Z,a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l,m,n,o,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,x,y,z}';
  result text := '';
  i integer := 0;
begin
  if length < 0 then
    raise exception 'Given length cannot be less than 0';
  end if;
  for i in 1..length loop
    result := result || chars[1+random()*(array_length(chars, 1)-1)];
  end loop;
  return result;
end;
$$ language plpgsql;

And the usage:

select random_string(15);

Example output:

select random_string(15) from generate_series(1,15);

  random_string
-----------------
 5emZKMYUB9C2vT6
 3i4JfnKraWduR0J
 R5xEfIZEllNynJR
 tMAxfql0iMWMIxM
 aPSYd7pDLcyibl2
 3fPDd54P5llb84Z
 VeywDb53oQfn9GZ
 BJGaXtfaIkN4NV8
 w1mvxzX33NTiBby
 knI1Opt4QDonHCJ
 P9KC5IBcLE0owBQ
 vvEEwc4qfV4VJLg
 ckpwwuG8YbMYQJi
 rFf6TchXTO3XsLs
 axdQvaLBitm6SDP
(15 rows)

Solution 3 - Postgresql

You can get 128 bits of random from a UUID. This is the method to get the job done in modern PostgreSQL.

CREATE EXTENSION pgcrypto;
SELECT gen_random_uuid();

           gen_random_uuid            
--------------------------------------
 202ed325-b8b1-477f-8494-02475973a28f

May be worth reading the docs on UUID too

> The data type uuid stores Universally Unique Identifiers (UUID) as defined by RFC 4122, ISO/IEC 9834-8:2005, and related standards. (Some systems refer to this data type as a globally unique identifier, or GUID, instead.) This identifier is a 128-bit quantity that is generated by an algorithm chosen to make it very unlikely that the same identifier will be generated by anyone else in the known universe using the same algorithm. Therefore, for distributed systems, these identifiers provide a better uniqueness guarantee than sequence generators, which are only unique within a single database.

How rare is a collision with UUID, or guessable? Assuming they're random,

> About 100 trillion version 4 UUIDs would need to be generated to have a 1 in a billion chance of a single duplicate ("collision"). The chance of one collision rises to 50% only after 261 UUIDs (2.3 x 10^18 or 2.3 quintillion) have been generated. Relating these numbers to databases, and considering the issue of whether the probability of a Version 4 UUID collision is negligible, consider a file containing 2.3 quintillion Version 4 UUIDs, with a 50% chance of containing one UUID collision. It would be 36 exabytes in size, assuming no other data or overhead, thousands of times larger than the largest databases currently in existence, which are on the order of petabytes. At the rate of 1 billion UUIDs generated per second, it would take 73 years to generate the UUIDs for the file. It would also require about 3.6 million 10-terabyte hard drives or tape cartridges to store it, assuming no backups or redundancy. Reading the file at a typical "disk-to-buffer" transfer rate of 1 gigabit per second would require over 3000 years for a single processor. Since the unrecoverable read error rate of drives is 1 bit per 1018 bits read, at best, while the file would contain about 1020 bits, just reading the file once from end to end would result, at least, in about 100 times more mis-read UUIDs than duplicates. Storage, network, power, and other hardware and software errors would undoubtedly be thousands of times more frequent than UUID duplication problems.

source: wikipedia

In summary,

  • UUID is standardized.
  • gen_random_uuid() is 128 bits of random stored in 128 bits (2**128 combinations). 0-waste.
  • random() only generates 52 bits of random in PostgreSQL (2**52 combinations).
  • md5() stored as UUID is 128 bits, but it can only be as random as its input (52 bits if using random())
  • md5() stored as text is 288 bits, but it only can only be as random as its input (52 bits if using random()) - over twice the size of a UUID and a fraction of the randomness)
  • md5() as a hash, can be so optimized that it doesn't effectively do much.
  • UUID is highly efficient for storage: PostgreSQL provides a type that is exactly 128 bits. Unlike text and varchar, etc which store as a varlena which has overhead for the length of the string.
  • PostgreSQL nifty UUID comes with some default operators, castings, and features.

Solution 4 - Postgresql

Building on Marcin's solution, you could do this to use an arbitrary alphabet (in this case, all 62 ASCII alphanumeric characters):

SELECT array_to_string(array 
       ( 
              select substr('abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0123456789', trunc(random() * 62)::integer + 1, 1)
              FROM   generate_series(1, 12)), '');

Solution 5 - Postgresql

Please use string_agg!

SELECT string_agg (substr('abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0123456789', ceil (random() * 62)::integer, 1), '')
FROM   generate_series(1, 45);

I'm using this with MD5 to generate a UUID also. I just want a random value with more bits than a random () integer.

Solution 6 - Postgresql

I was playing with PostgreSQL recently, and I think I've found a little better solution, using only built-in PostgreSQL methods - no pl/pgsql. The only limitation is it currently generates only UPCASE strings, or numbers, or lower case strings.

template1=> SELECT array_to_string(ARRAY(SELECT chr((65 + round(random() * 25)) :: integer) FROM generate_series(1,12)), '');
 array_to_string
-----------------
 TFBEGODDVTDM

template1=> SELECT array_to_string(ARRAY(SELECT chr((48 + round(random() * 9)) :: integer) FROM generate_series(1,12)), '');
 array_to_string
-----------------
 868778103681

The second argument to the generate_series method dictates the length of the string.

Solution 7 - Postgresql

While not active by default, you could activate one of the core extensions:

CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS pgcrypto;

Then your statement becomes a simple call to gen_salt() which generates a random string:

select gen_salt('md5') from generate_series(1,4);

 gen_salt
-----------
$1$M.QRlF4U
$1$cv7bNJDM
$1$av34779p
$1$ZQkrCXHD

The leading number is a hash identifier. Several algorithms are available each with their own identifier:

  • md5: $1$
  • bf: $2a$06$
  • des: no identifier
  • xdes: _J9..

More information on extensions:


EDIT

As indicated by Evan Carrol, as of v9.4 you can use gen_random_uuid()

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/pgcrypto.html

Solution 8 - Postgresql

@Kavius recommended using pgcrypto, but instead of gen_salt, what about gen_random_bytes? And how about sha512 instead of md5?

create extension if not exists pgcrypto;
select digest(gen_random_bytes(1024), 'sha512');

Docs:

> F.25.5. Random-Data Functions > > gen_random_bytes(count integer) returns bytea > > Returns count cryptographically strong random bytes. At most 1024 > bytes can be extracted at a time. This is to avoid draining the > randomness generator pool.

Solution 9 - Postgresql

The INTEGER parameter defines the length of the string. Guaranteed to cover all 62 alphanum characters with equal probability (unlike some other solutions floating around on the Internet).

CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION random_string(INTEGER)
RETURNS TEXT AS
$BODY$
SELECT array_to_string(
    ARRAY (
        SELECT substring(
            '0123456789ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz'
            FROM (ceil(random()*62))::int FOR 1
        )
        FROM generate_series(1, $1)
    ), 
    ''
)
$BODY$
LANGUAGE sql VOLATILE;

Solution 10 - Postgresql

I do not think that you are looking for a random string per se. What you would need for session verification is a string that is guaranteed to be unique. Do you store session verification information for auditing? In that case you need the string to be unique between sessions. I know of two, rather simple approaches:

  1. Use a sequence. Good for use on a single database.
  2. Use an UUID. Universally unique, so good on distributed environments too.

UUIDs are guaranteed to be unique by virtue of their algorithm for generation; effectively it is extremely unlikely that you will generate two identical numbers on any machine, at any time, ever (note that this is much stronger than on random strings, which have a far smaller periodicity than UUIDs).

You need to load the uuid-ossp extension to use UUIDs. Once installed, call any of the available uuid_generate_vXXX() functions in your SELECT, INSERT or UPDATE calls. The uuid type is a 16-byte numeral, but it also has a string representation.

Solution 11 - Postgresql

select * from md5(to_char(random(), '0.9999999999999999'));

Solution 12 - Postgresql

create extension if not exists pgcrypto;

then

SELECT encode(gen_random_bytes(20),'base64')

or even

SELECT encode(gen_random_bytes(20),'hex')

This is for 20 bytes = 160 bits of randomness (as long as sha1 for example).

Solution 13 - Postgresql

select encode(decode(md5(random()::text), 'hex')||decode(md5(random()::text), 'hex'), 'base64')

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestiongershView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - PostgresqlPeter EisentrautView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - PostgresqlSzymon LipińskiView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - PostgresqlEvan CarrollView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - PostgresqlgrourkView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - PostgresqlAndrew WolfeView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - PostgresqlMarcin RaczkowskiView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - PostgresqlJefferey CaveView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - PostgresqlJared BeckView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - PostgresqlLaryx DeciduaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 10 - PostgresqlPatrickView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 11 - Postgresqluser516487View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 12 - PostgresqlBenoit EssiambreView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 13 - Postgresqluser457226View Answer on Stackoverflow