Yes, there will always be an empty row at the bottom of a `DataGridView`. It allows the user to add new data at run-time; all they have to do is start typing in the new row.

To disable it, you will also need to prevent the user from adding new rows. Do this by setting the [`AllowUserToAddRows` property][1] of your `DataGridView` control to False:

    myDataGridView.AllowUserToAddRows = false;


  [1]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.windows.forms.datagridview.allowusertoaddrows.aspx

If you are having trouble with this in WPF add:
```
CanUserAddRows=&quot;False&quot;
```
To the properties of the desired datagrid in XAML.

I want to have one table with two `TIMESTAMP` columns. One column to keep track of when the record was created and another to keep track of when it was modified. I want these values handled by the database. I don&#39;t want my app layer to have to think about it.

I know that if you have a `TIMESTAMP` column with a `DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP` or an `ON UPDATE CURRENT_TIMESTAMP` you cannot have another `TIMESTAMP` column. You can use `DATETIME` but there is no way to default it, that I know of, outside of a trigger.

I found that you &lt;a href=&quot;https://web.archive.org/web/20160401143159/http://michaelkimsal.com/blog/mysql-using-two-timestamps-for-createdupdated-values/&quot;&gt;can have multiple `TIMESTAMP` columns&lt;/a&gt; by leaving each without `DEFAULT` or `ON UPDATE` and inserting `NULL` when the record is created, causing each to have the current timestamp. From that point on the first column will automatically be updated.

This works fantastically but it leaves me with a funny feeling. Like this may be a bug and it could be patched at any time. If this is the way it is supposed to work then so be it. I will merrily go on my way. Can anyone tell me if this is the best way to do this or should I be using triggers?

One Mysql Table with Multiple TIMESTAMP Columns

I am creating an extension that will download a mp3 file off a website. I am trying to do this by creating a new tab with the link to the mp3 file, but chrome keeps opening it inside the player instead of downloading it. Is there any way I can create a pop-up to ask the user to &quot;save-as&quot; the file?

Making a Chrome Extension download a file

When I fill a DataGridView with data, there is always an empty row at the bottom.
How do I disable this?

How do I remove the empty row from the bottom of a DataGridView control?

<p>When I fill a DataGridView with data, there is always an empty row at the bottom.
How do I disable this?</p>


I was of the impression that in C#, struct elements are allocated on the stack and thus disappear when returning from a method in which they were created. But what happens if I place the struct-values in a list and return that? The elements survives. **Are struct instances sometimes allocated on the heap?**


    internal struct Stru
    {
      public int i;
    }
  
    internal class StruTry
    {
      public List&lt;Stru&gt; Get(int max)
      {
        var l = new List&lt;Stru&gt;();
        for (int i = 0; i &lt; max; i++)
          l.Add(new Stru {i=i});

        return l;
      }
    }


code printing 0, 1, 2

    [Test]
    public void T()
    {
      var ll = new StruTry().Get(3);
      foreach (var stru in ll)
        Console.WriteLine(&quot;* &quot;+ stru.i);
    }



Are Structs always stack allocated or sometimes heap allocated?

I have a byte, specifically one byte from a byte array which came in via UDP sent from another device. This byte stores the on/off state of 8 relays in the device.

How do I get the value of a specific bit in said byte? Ideally an extension method would look the most elegant and returning a bool would make the most sense to me.

    public static bool GetBit(this byte b, int bitNumber)
    {
        //black magic goes here
    }



Get a specific bit from byte

If I have code like this

    if(true){

and I add

    }

it is transformed into

    if (true)
    {
    }

but I would like it to stay in format

    if (true) {
    }

Even if I copy code that has `if` like this, it is transformed into the longer version.

P.S. I understand that it&#39;s a C++ and C# standard to use the longer version, however I do come from a different standard, and it&#39;s easier for me to use the shorter version.

**I bet there is some formatter option that can be turned off or changed.**

How to make Visual Studio not put { on a new line?

Is it possible to serialize a .Net Dictionary&amp;lt;Key,Value&amp;gt; into JSON with **DataContractJsonSerializer** that is of the format:

    {
      key0:value0,
      key1:value1,
      ...
    }

I use Dictionary &amp;lt;K,V&amp;gt;, because there is not predefined structure of the inputs.

I&#39;m interesting just for **DataContractJsonSerializer** result! I&#39;ve already found a &quot;Surrogate&quot; example, but there is an additional &quot;data&quot; in the output, and if the dictionary &amp;lt;K, String&amp;gt; is, the escaping is false too.

-------------------------
I&#39;ve found the solution, what a needed! First of all, a serializable &quot;dictionary&quot; class:
(Of course, this sample works just in one way, but I dont&#39;t need deserialization)

	[Serializable]
	public class MyJsonDictionary&lt;K, V&gt; : ISerializable {
		Dictionary&lt;K, V&gt; dict = new Dictionary&lt;K, V&gt;();
		
		public MyJsonDictionary() { }

		protected MyJsonDictionary( SerializationInfo info, StreamingContext context ) {
			throw new NotImplementedException();
		}

		public void GetObjectData( SerializationInfo info, StreamingContext context ) {
			foreach( K key in dict.Keys ) {
				info.AddValue( key.ToString(), dict[ key ] );
			}
		}

		public void Add( K key, V value ) {
			dict.Add( key, value );
		}
		
		public V this[ K index ] {
			set { dict[ index ] = value; }
			get { return dict[ index ]; }
		}
	}

Usage:

    public class MainClass {
		public static String Serialize( Object data ) {
			var serializer = new DataContractJsonSerializer( data.GetType() );
			var ms = new MemoryStream();
			serializer.WriteObject( ms, data );

			return Encoding.UTF8.GetString( ms.ToArray() );
		}

		public static void Main() {
			MyJsonDictionary&lt;String, Object&gt; result = new MyJsonDictionary&lt;String, Object&gt;();
			result[&quot;foo&quot;] = &quot;bar&quot;;
			result[&quot;Name&quot;] = &quot;John Doe&quot;;
			result[&quot;Age&quot;] = 32;
			MyJsonDictionary&lt;String, Object&gt; address = new MyJsonDictionary&lt;String, Object&gt;();
			result[&quot;Address&quot;] = address;
			address[&quot;Street&quot;] = &quot;30 Rockefeller Plaza&quot;;
			address[&quot;City&quot;] = &quot;New York City&quot;;
			address[&quot;State&quot;] = &quot;NY&quot;;

			Console.WriteLine( Serialize( result ) );

			Console.ReadLine();
		}
	}

And the result:

    {
          &quot;foo&quot;:&quot;bar&quot;,
          &quot;Name&quot;:&quot;John Doe&quot;,
          &quot;Age&quot;:32,
          &quot;Address&quot;:{
             &quot;__type&quot;:&quot;MyJsonDictionaryOfstringanyType:#Json_Dictionary_Test&quot;,
             &quot;Street&quot;:&quot;30 Rockefeller Plaza&quot;,
             &quot;City&quot;:&quot;New York City&quot;,
             &quot;State&quot;:&quot;NY&quot;
          }
       }

C# JSON Serialization of Dictionary into {key:value, ...} instead of {key:key, value:value, ...}

I&#39;ve created a Windows Service called **ProxyMonitor** and I&#39;m currently at the stage where the service is installs and uninstall&#39;s the way I want it.

So I execute the application like so:

    C:\\Windows\\Vendor\\ProxyMonitor.exe /install

Pretty self explanatory, and then I got to `services.msc` and and start the service, but when I do this I get the following message:

&gt; The Proxy Monitor Service on Local Computer started and then stopped. Some services stop automatically if there is no work to do, For example, The performance Logs and Alerts Services

My code looks like so:

    public static Main(string[] Args)
    {
        if (System.Environment.UserInteractive)
        {
            /*
                * Here I have my install logic
            */
        }
        else
        {
            ServiceBase.Run(new ProxyMonitor());
        }
    }

And then within ProxyMonitor class I have:

    public ProxyMonitor()
    {
    }

    protected override void OnStart(string[] args)
    {
        base.OnStart(args);
        ProxyEventLog.WriteEntry(&quot;ProxyMonitor Started&quot;);

        running = true;
        while (running)
        {
            //Execution Loop
        }
    }

and `onStop()` I just change the `running` variable to `false`;

What would I need to do to make the Service constantly active, as I would need to be monitoring the network I need to trace changes etc.

---
Update: 1

    protected override void OnStart(string[] args)
    {
         base.OnStart(args);
         ProxyEventLog.WriteEntry(&quot;ProxyMonitor Started&quot;);
   
         Thread = new Thread(ThreadWorker);
         Thread.Start();
     }

Within the `ThreadWorker` I have `ProxyEventLogger.WriteEntry(&quot;Main thread entered&quot;)` which does not get fired.

Windows Service to run constantly

I am writing a prototype TCP connection and I am having some trouble homogenizing the data to be sent.

  At the moment, I am sending nothing but strings, but in the future we want to be able to send any object. 

 The code is quite simple at the moment, because I thought everything could be cast into a byte array:

    void SendData(object headerObject, object bodyObject)
    {
      byte[] header = (byte[])headerObject;  //strings at runtime, 
      byte[] body = (byte[])bodyObject;      //invalid cast exception

      // Unable to cast object of type &#39;System.String&#39; to type &#39;System.Byte[]&#39;.
      ...
    }

This of course is easily enough solved with a 

    if( state.headerObject is System.String ){...}

The problem is, if I do it that way, I need to check for EVERY type of object that can&#39;t be cast to a byte[] at runtime.

  Since I do not know every object that can&#39;t be cast into a byte[] at runtime, this really isn&#39;t an option.

How does one convert any object at all into a byte array in C# .NET 4.0?

Convert any object to a byte[]

&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  
&gt; [ReSharper and var](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/737835/resharper-and-var)  

&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;

After I have installed ReSharper it demands(by warnings) that I use var whenever possible, for example

    UnhandledExceptionEventArgs ue = (UnhandledExceptionEventArgs) t;

ReSharper wants to turn it into

    var ue = (UnhandledExceptionEventArgs) t;

I like the first version better, is there any reason to prefer **var**? better performance? anything? or is it just a code style?

Why should I use var instead of a type?

may be it is a simple question but I&#39;m try all of conversion method! and it still has error!
would you help me?

decimal? (nullable decimal) to decimal

How can I convert decimal? to decimal

In Visual Studio 2010, the Step Into Property/Function (&lt;kbd&gt;F11&lt;/kbd&gt;) doesn&#39;t work as expected.

It doesn&#39;t step into property setters or getters.

I converted the solution from `Visual Studio 2005` to `2010`, the function i wanted to step into is a property in a separate class library.

How can I make it work as I expect?

Step Into Property/Function (F11) doesn&#39;t work as expected

My C# WinForms solution has two projects.
A DLL which is the main project I&#39;m working on, and an executable WinForms I call &quot;Sandbox&quot; so that I can compile/run/debug the DLL easily in one go.

I&#39;m working in .Net 4.0 for both projects.

Everything was working fine until I added some seemingly innocent code, and a reference to System.Web in the DLL.
Now my Sandbox project can&#39;t see the namespace of the DLL project. I didn&#39;t change anything which I believe should have affected this.

If I delete the project reference to the DLL from the Sandbox references and re-add it, then the red underlines all disappear and the colour coding comes back for all my classes etc; but as as soon as I try to build the solution, the whole thing falls apart again.

When I right-click the DLL project in the Sandbox&#39;s references and view in object browser, I can see the namespace and all the stuff in there.

I have a feeling this might be some sort of bug?

Is this some sort of VS2010 bug? I had this same issue a few months ago and I could only fix it at the time by making a whole new project and re-importing my files. This time, however, I have a bajillion files and will only do that as a last resort!

Edit:
After panickedly going through and undoing all my changes, trying to find what caused the problems, it seems to be this line:

    string url = &quot;http://maps.google.com?q=&quot; + HttpUtility.UrlEncode(address);

If I comment out this line, then I get no namespace errors and the project builds fine. I can&#39;t see anything wrong with this line though.

Visual Studio 2010 suddenly can&#39;t see namespace?

I have a `ContextMenuStrip` that is assigned to several different listboxes.  I am trying to figure out when the `ContextMenuStrip` is clicked what `ListBox` it was used on.  I tried the code below as a start but it is not working.  The `sender` has the correct value, but when I try to assign it to the `menuSubmitted` it is null.

    private void MenuViewDetails_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        ContextMenu menuSubmitted = sender as ContextMenu;
        if (menuSubmitted != null)
        {
            Control sourceControl = menuSubmitted.SourceControl;
        }
    }

Any help would be great. Thanks.

Using the assistance below, I figured it out:

    private void MenuViewDetails_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
            {
                ToolStripMenuItem menuItem = sender as ToolStripMenuItem;
                if (menuItem != null)
                {
                    ContextMenuStrip calendarMenu = menuItem.Owner as ContextMenuStrip;
    
                    if (calendarMenu != null)
                    {
                        Control controlSelected = calendarMenu.SourceControl;
                    }
                }
            }

Determine what control the ContextMenuStrip was used on

Can anyone point me to a good implementation of a basic Windows Forms TextBox that will initially show watermark text that disappears when the cursor enters it? I think I can create my own with some creative use of Enter and Leave events, but I&#39;m sure there&#39;s a perfectly usable implementation sitting around somewhere. I saw the WPF implementation and if necessary I could nest it, but a native WinForms TextBox derivative would be better.

I have this so far; haven&#39;t tried it yet but does anyone see any glaring problems?

    public class WatermarkTextBox:TextBox
    {
        public string WatermarkText { get; set; }

        public Color WatermarkColor { get; set; }

        private Color TextColor { get; set; }

        private bool isInTransition;

        public WatermarkTextBox()
        {
            WatermarkColor = SystemColors.GrayText;
        }

        private bool HasText { get { return Text.IsNotNullOrBlankOr(WatermarkText); }}

        protected override void OnEnter(EventArgs e)
        {
            base.OnEnter(e);

            if (HasText) return;

            isInTransition = true;
            ForeColor = TextColor;
            Text = String.Empty;
            isInTransition = false;
        }

        protected override void OnForeColorChanged(EventArgs e)
        {
            base.OnForeColorChanged(e);
            if (!isInTransition) //the change came from outside
                TextColor = ForeColor;
        }

        protected override void OnLeave(EventArgs e)
        {
            base.OnLeave(e);

            if (HasText) return;

            isInTransition = true;
            ForeColor = WatermarkColor;
            Text = WatermarkText.EmptyIfNull();
            isInTransition = false;
        }
    }

EDIT: The above would have eventually worked with some finessing, but the CueProvider worked much better. Here&#39;s my final implementation:

    public class WatermarkTextBox:TextBox
    {
        private string watermarkText;
        public string WatermarkText
        {
            get { return watermarkText; }
            set
            {
                watermarkText = value;
                if (watermarkText.IsNullOrBlank())
                    CueProvider.ClearCue(this);
                else
                    CueProvider.SetCue(this, watermarkText);
            }
        }
    }

I could have integrated the CueProvider functionality completely, but this works beautifully.

Watermark TextBox in WinForms

Let&#39;s say I have a Control and its location is relative to its parent.  If its embedded many times and is the great great great grandchild of the main form, how can I determine what its location is on my entire screen, not just its location in the immediate parent?  This is for the purpose of printing a particular Control via a screenshot (since for some controls the DrawToBitmap doesn&#39;t work properly). 

Getting The Location Of A Control Relative To The Entire Screen?

I want to select a file on the local hard disk when I click a &quot;Browse&quot; button.

I don&#39;t have any idea how to use the `OpenFileDialog` control. Can anyone help me?

How to add browse file button to Windows Form using C#

How to set focus on any specified cell in DataGridView? I was expecting a simple way like Focus(rowindex,columnindex) but it is not that easy.

DataGridView - Focus a specific cell

How can I right-align text in a DataGridView column? I am writing a .NET WinForms application.

How can I right-align text in a DataGridView column?

I have a datagridview on my form and I populate it with this:

    dataGridView1.DataSource = students.Select(s =&gt; new { ID = s.StudentId, RUDE = s.RUDE, Nombre = s.Name, Apellidos = s.LastNameFather + &quot; &quot; + s.LastNameMother, Nacido = s.DateOfBirth })
                                       .OrderBy(s =&gt; s.Apellidos)
                                       .ToList();

Now, I use the s.Apellidos as the default sort, but I&#39;d also like to allow users to sort when clicking on the column header.

This sort will **not** modify the data in any way, it&#39;s just a client side bonus to allow for easier searching for information when scanning the screen with their eyes.

Thanks for the suggestions.

How to enable DataGridView sorting when user clicks on the column header?

I&#39;m developing user control in C# Visual Studio 2010 - a kind of &quot;quick find&quot; textbox for filtering datagridview. It should work for 3 types of datagridview datasources: DataTable, DataBinding and DataSet.
My problem is with filtering DataTable from DataSet object, which is displayed on DataGridView.

There could be 3 cases (examples for standard WinForm application with DataGridView and TextBox on it) - first 2 are working OK, I&#39;ve problem with 3rd one:

**1. datagridview.DataSource = dataTable : it works**   
so I can filter by setting: dataTable.DefaultView.RowFilter = &quot;country LIKE &#39;%s%&#39;&quot;;  


    DataTable dt = new DataTable();

    private void Form1_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        dt.Columns.Add(&quot;id&quot;, typeof(int));
        dt.Columns.Add(&quot;country&quot;, typeof(string));

        dt.Rows.Add(new object[] { 1, &quot;Belgium&quot; });
        dt.Rows.Add(new object[] { 2, &quot;France&quot; });
        dt.Rows.Add(new object[] { 3, &quot;Germany&quot; });
        dt.Rows.Add(new object[] { 4, &quot;Spain&quot; });
        dt.Rows.Add(new object[] { 5, &quot;Switzerland&quot; });
        dt.Rows.Add(new object[] { 6, &quot;United Kingdom&quot; });

        dataGridView1.DataSource = dt;
    }

    private void textBox1_TextChanged(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        MessageBox.Show(&quot;DataSource type BEFORE = &quot; + dataGridView1.DataSource.GetType().ToString());
            
        dt.DefaultView.RowFilter = string.Format(&quot;country LIKE &#39;%{0}%&#39;&quot;, textBox1.Text);
            
        MessageBox.Show(&quot;DataSource type AFTER = &quot; + dataGridView1.DataSource.GetType().ToString());
    } 


**2. datagridview.DataSource = bindingSource: it works**   
so I can filter by setting: bindingSource.Filter = &quot;country LIKE &#39;%s%&#39;&quot;;  


    DataTable dt = new DataTable();
    BindingSource bs = new BindingSource();

    private void Form1_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        dt.Columns.Add(&quot;id&quot;, typeof(int));
        dt.Columns.Add(&quot;country&quot;, typeof(string));

        dt.Rows.Add(new object[] { 1, &quot;Belgium&quot; });
        dt.Rows.Add(new object[] { 2, &quot;France&quot; });
        dt.Rows.Add(new object[] { 3, &quot;Germany&quot; });
        dt.Rows.Add(new object[] { 4, &quot;Spain&quot; });
        dt.Rows.Add(new object[] { 5, &quot;Switzerland&quot; });
        dt.Rows.Add(new object[] { 6, &quot;United Kingdom&quot; });

        bs.DataSource = dt;
        dataGridView1.DataSource = bs;
    }

    private void textBox1_TextChanged(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        MessageBox.Show(&quot;DataSource type BEFORE = &quot; + dataGridView1.DataSource.GetType().ToString());
            
        bs.Filter = string.Format(&quot;country LIKE &#39;%{0}%&#39;&quot;, textBox1.Text);
            
        MessageBox.Show(&quot;DataSource type AFTER = &quot; + dataGridView1.DataSource.GetType().ToString());
    }


**3. datagridview.DataSource = dataSource; datagridview.DataMember = &quot;TableName&quot;: it doesn&#39;t work**  
It happens when you design a table using designer: put the DataSet from toolbox on form, add dataTable to it and then set datagridview.DataSource = dataSource; and datagridview.DataMember = &quot;TableName&quot;.  
Code below pretends these operations:  

    DataSet ds = new DataSet();
    DataTable dt = new DataTable();

    private void Form1_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        dt.Columns.Add(&quot;id&quot;, typeof(int));
        dt.Columns.Add(&quot;country&quot;, typeof(string));

        dt.Rows.Add(new object[] { 1, &quot;Belgium&quot; });
        dt.Rows.Add(new object[] { 2, &quot;France&quot; });
        dt.Rows.Add(new object[] { 3, &quot;Germany&quot; });
        dt.Rows.Add(new object[] { 4, &quot;Spain&quot; });
        dt.Rows.Add(new object[] { 5, &quot;Switzerland&quot; });
        dt.Rows.Add(new object[] { 6, &quot;United Kingdom&quot; });

        ds.Tables.Add(dt);
        dataGridView1.DataSource = ds;
        dataGridView1.DataMember = dt.TableName;
    }

    private void textBox1_TextChanged(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        MessageBox.Show(&quot;DataSource type BEFORE = &quot; + dataGridView1.DataSource.GetType().ToString());  
        //it is not working
        ds.Tables[0].DefaultView.RowFilter = string.Format(&quot;country LIKE &#39;%{0}%&#39;&quot;, textBox1.Text);
            
        MessageBox.Show(&quot;DataSource type AFTER = &quot; + dataGridView1.DataSource.GetType().ToString());
    }

If you test it - although datatable is filtered (ds.Tables[0].DefaultView.Count changes), datagridview is not updated...
I&#39;ve been looking for a long time for any solution, but the problem is that **DataSource cannot change** - as it&#39;s additional control, I don&#39;t want it to mess up with programmer&#39;s code.  

I know possible solutions are:  
- to bind DataTable from DataSet using DataBinding and use it as example 2: but it&#39;s up to the programmer during code writing,   
- to change dataSource to BindingSource, dataGridView.DataSource = dataSet.Tables[0], or to DefaultView programatically: however, it changes the DataSource. So the solution:  

    private void textBox1_TextChanged(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        MessageBox.Show(&quot;DataSource type BEFORE = &quot; + dataGridView1.DataSource.GetType().ToString(), ds.Tables[0].DefaultView.Count.ToString());

        DataView dv = ds.Tables[0].DefaultView;
        dv.RowFilter = string.Format(&quot;country LIKE &#39;%{0}%&#39;&quot;, textBox1.Text);
        dataGridView1.DataSource = dv;

        MessageBox.Show(&quot;DataSource type AFTER = &quot; + dataGridView1.DataSource.GetType().ToString(), ds.Tables[0].DefaultView.Count.ToString());
    }
  is not acceptable, as you see on MessageBox&#39;s dataSource is changing...  

I don&#39;t want to do that, because it&#39;s possible a programmer writes code similar to this:

    private void textBox1_TextChanged(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        MessageBox.Show(&quot;DataSource type BEFORE = &quot; + dataGridView1.DataSource.GetType().ToString(), ds.Tables[0].DefaultView.Count.ToString());

        DataSet dsTmp = (DataSet)(dataGridView1.DataSource);   //&lt;--- it is OK 

        DataView dv = ds.Tables[0].DefaultView;
        dv.RowFilter = string.Format(&quot;country LIKE &#39;%{0}%&#39;&quot;, textBox1.Text);
        dataGridView1.DataSource = dv;   //&lt;--- here the source is changeing from DataSet to DataView

        MessageBox.Show(&quot;DataSource type AFTER = &quot; + dataGridView1.DataSource.GetType().ToString(), ds.Tables[0].DefaultView.Count.ToString());
        
        dsTmp = (DataSet)(dataGridView1.DataSource);    //&lt;-- throws an exception: Unable to cast object DataView to DataSet
    }

He can do that, as he designed DataGridView with DataSet and DataMember in designer.
Code will be compiled, however, after using a filter, it will throw an exception...


So the question is: how can I filter DataTable in DataSet and show the results on DataGridView without changing DataSource to another? Why I can filter DataTable from example 1 directly, while filtering DataTable from DataSet is not working?
Maybe it&#39;s not DataTable bound to DataGridView in that case?  

Please note, that my problem takes from designing issues, so the solution MUST WORK on example 3. 


Filtering DataGridView without changing datasource

How can I select a particular range of rows in a `DataGridView` programmatically at runtime?

Content Type	Original Author	Original Content on Stackoverflow
Question	Luke	View Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - C#	Cody Gray	View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - C#	Julia	View Answer on Stackoverflow

How do I remove the empty row from the bottom of a DataGridView control?

C# Problem Overview

C# Solutions

Solution 1 - C#

Solution 2 - C#

Making a Chrome Extension download a file

One Mysql Table with Multiple TIMESTAMP Columns

Attributions