Get array of object's keys

JavascriptEcmascript 5

Javascript Problem Overview


I would like to get the keys of a JavaScript object as an array, either in jQuery or pure JavaScript.

Is there a less verbose way than this?

var foo = { 'alpha' : 'puffin', 'beta' : 'beagle' };
var keys = [];
for (var key in foo) {
    keys.push(key);
}

Javascript Solutions


Solution 1 - Javascript

Use Object.keys:

var foo = {
  'alpha': 'puffin',
  'beta': 'beagle'
};

var keys = Object.keys(foo);
console.log(keys) // ['alpha', 'beta'] 
// (or maybe some other order, keys are unordered).

This is an ES5 feature. This means it works in all modern browsers but will not work in legacy browsers.

The ES5-shim has a implementation of Object.keys you can steal

Solution 2 - Javascript

You can use jQuery's $.map.

var foo = { 'alpha' : 'puffin', 'beta' : 'beagle' },
keys = $.map(foo, function(v, i){
  return i;
});

Solution 3 - Javascript

Of course, Object.keys() is the best way to get an Object's keys. If it's not available in your environment, it can be trivially shimmed using code such as in your example (except you'd need to take into account your loop will iterate over all properties up the prototype chain, unlike Object.keys()'s behaviour).

However, your example code...

var foo = { 'alpha' : 'puffin', 'beta' : 'beagle' };
var keys = [];
for (var key in foo) {
    keys.push(key);
}

jsFiddle.

...could be modified. You can do the assignment right in the variable part.

var foo = { 'alpha' : 'puffin', 'beta' : 'beagle' };
var keys = [], i = 0;
for (keys[i++] in foo) {}

jsFiddle.

Of course, this behaviour is different to what Object.keys() actually does (jsFiddle). You could simply use the shim on the MDN documentation.

Solution 4 - Javascript

In case you're here looking for something to list the keys of an n-depth nested object as a flat array:

const getObjectKeys = (obj, prefix = '') => {
  return Object.entries(obj).reduce((collector, [key, val]) => {
    const newKeys = [ ...collector, prefix ? `${prefix}.${key}` : key ]
    if (Object.prototype.toString.call(val) === '[object Object]') {
      const newPrefix = prefix ? `${prefix}.${key}` : key
      const otherKeys = getObjectKeys(val, newPrefix)
      return [ ...newKeys, ...otherKeys ]
    }
    return newKeys
  }, [])
}

console.log(getObjectKeys({a: 1, b: 2, c: { d: 3, e: { f: 4 }}}))

Solution 5 - Javascript

I don't know about less verbose but I was inspired to coerce the following onto one line by the one-liner request, don't know how Pythonic it is though ;)

var keys = (function(o){var ks=[]; for(var k in o) ks.push(k); return ks})(foo);

Solution 6 - Javascript

Summary

For getting all of the keys of an Object you can use Object.keys(). Object.keys() takes an object as an argument and returns an array of all the keys.

Example:

const object = {
  a: 'string1',
  b: 42,
  c: 34
};

const keys = Object.keys(object)

console.log(keys);

console.log(keys.length) // we can easily access the total amount of properties the object has

In the above example we store an array of keys in the keys const. We then can easily access the amount of properties on the object by checking the length of the keys array.

Getting the values with: Object.values()

The complementary function of Object.keys() is Object.values(). This function takes an object as an argument and returns an array of values. For example:

const object = {
  a: 'random',
  b: 22,
  c: true
};


console.log(Object.values(object));

Solution 7 - Javascript

If you decide to use Underscore.js you better do

var foo = { 'alpha' : 'puffin', 'beta' : 'beagle' };
var keys = [];
_.each( foo, function( val, key ) {
    keys.push(key);
});
console.log(keys);

Solution 8 - Javascript

Year 2022 and JavaScript still does not have a sound way to work with hashes?

This issues a warning but works:

Object.prototype.keys = function() { return Object.keys(this) }
console.log("Keys of an object: ", { a:1, b:2 }.keys() )

// Keys of an object:  Array [ "a", "b" ]
// WARN: Line 8:1:  Object prototype is read only, properties should not be added  no-extend-native

That said, Extending Built-in Objects is Controversial.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionRichardView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - JavascriptRaynosView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - Javascriptgen_EricView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - JavascriptalexView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - JavascriptCody MonizView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - JavascriptDexygenView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - JavascriptWillem van der VeenView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - Javascriptmohammad javad ahmadiView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - JavascriptOndra ŽižkaView Answer on Stackoverflow