libpthread.so.0: error adding symbols: DSO missing from command line

GccCompiler ErrorsLinkerUndefined Reference

Gcc Problem Overview


When I'm compiling openvswitch-1.5.0, I've encountered the following compile error:

 gcc -Wstrict-prototypes -Wall -Wno-sign-compare -Wpointer-arith
     -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wformat-security -Wswitch-enum -Wunused-parameter -Wstrict-aliasing -Wbad-function-cast -Wcast-align -Wstrict-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-field-initializers -Wno-override-init  -g -O2 -export-dynamic ***-lpthread***  -o utilities/ovs-dpctl utilities/ovs-dpctl.o lib/libopenvswitch.a
 /home/jyyoo/src/dpdk/build/lib/librte_eal.a
 /home/jyyoo/src/dpdk/build/lib/libethdev.a
 /home/jyyoo/src/dpdk/build/lib/librte_cmdline.a
 /home/jyyoo/src/dpdk/build/lib/librte_hash.a
 /home/jyyoo/src/dpdk/build/lib/librte_lpm.a
 /home/jyyoo/src/dpdk/build/lib/librte_mbuf.a
 /home/jyyoo/src/dpdk/build/lib/librte_ring.a
 /home/jyyoo/src/dpdk/build/lib/librte_mempool.a
 /home/jyyoo/src/dpdk/build/lib/librte_malloc.a -lrt -lm 
     /usr/bin/ld: /home/jyyoo/src/dpdk/build/lib/librte_eal.a(eal.o): undefined reference
     to symbol 'pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.2.5'
     /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0: error adding symbols: DSO missing from 
     command line

If I try to see the symbols of libpthread, it looks fine.

$ readelf -s /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 | grep pthread_create
   199: 0000000000008220  2814 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   13 pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.2.5
   173: 0000000000008220  2814 FUNC    LOCAL  DEFAULT   13 __pthread_create_2_1
   462: 0000000000008220  2814 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   13 pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.2

Could you give any hints or pointers?

Gcc Solutions


Solution 1 - Gcc

You should mention the library on the command line after the object files being compiled:

 gcc -Wstrict-prototypes -Wall -Wno-sign-compare -Wpointer-arith -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wformat-security -Wswitch-enum -Wunused-parameter -Wstrict-aliasing -Wbad-function-cast -Wcast-align -Wstrict-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-field-initializers -Wno-override-init \
     -g -O2 -export-dynamic -o utilities/ovs-dpctl utilities/ovs-dpctl.o \
     lib/libopenvswitch.a \
     /home/jyyoo/src/dpdk/build/lib/librte_eal.a /home/jyyoo/src/dpdk/build/lib/libethdev.a /home/jyyoo/src/dpdk/build/lib/librte_cmdline.a /home/jyyoo/src/dpdk/build/lib/librte_hash.a /home/jyyoo/src/dpdk/build/lib/librte_lpm.a /home/jyyoo/src/dpdk/build/lib/librte_mbuf.a /home/jyyoo/src/dpdk/build/lib/librte_ring.a /home/jyyoo/src/dpdk/build/lib/librte_mempool.a /home/jyyoo/src/dpdk/build/lib/librte_malloc.a \
     -lrt -lm -lpthread 

Explanation: the linking is dependent on the order of modules. Symbols are first requested, and then linked in from a library that has them. So you have to specify modules that use libraries first, and libraries after them. Like this:

gcc x.o y.o z.o -la -lb -lc

Moreover, in case there's a circular dependency, you should specify the same library on the command line several times. So in case libb needs symbol from libc and libc needs symbol from libb, the command line should be:

gcc x.o y.o z.o -la -lb -lc -lb

Solution 2 - Gcc

The error message depends on distribution / compiler version:

Ubuntu Saucy:

/usr/bin/ld: /mnt/root/ffmpeg-2.1.1//libavformat/libavformat.a(http.o): undefined reference to symbol 'inflateInit2_'
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1: error adding symbols: DSO missing from command line

Ubuntu Raring: (more informative)

/usr/bin/ld: note: 'uncompress' is defined in DSO /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 so try adding it to the linker command line

Solution: You may be missing a library in your compilation steps, during the linking stage. In my case, I added '-lz' to makefile / GCC flags.

Background: DSO is a dynamic shared object or a shared library.

Solution 3 - Gcc

Background

The DSO missing from command line message will be displayed when the linker does not find the required symbol with it's normal search but the symbol is available in one of the dependencies of a directly specified dynamic library.

In the past the linker considered symbols in dependencies of specified languages to be available. But that changed in some later version and now the linker enforces a more strict view of what is available. The message thus is intended to help with that transition.

What to do?

If you are the maintainer of the software

You should solve this problem by making sure that all libraries that are needed to satisfy the needed symbols are directly specified on the linker command line. Also keep in mind that order often matters.

If you are just trying to compile the software

As a workaround it's possible to switch back to the more permissive view of what symbols are available by using the option -Wl,--copy-dt-needed-entries.

Common ways to inject this into a build are to export LDFLAGS before running configure or similar like this:

export LDFLAGS="-Wl,--copy-dt-needed-entries"

Sometimes passing LDFLAGS="-Wl,--copy-dt-needed-entries" directly to make might also work.

Solution 4 - Gcc

I found another case and therefore I thing you are all wrong.

This is what I had:

/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.8/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: eggtrayicon.o: undefined reference to symbol 'XFlush'
/usr/lib64/libX11.so.6: error adding symbols: DSO missing from command line

The problem is that the command line DID NOT contain -lX11 - although the libX11.so should be added as a dependency because there were also GTK and GNOME libraries in the arguments.

So, the only explanation for me is that this message might have been intended to help you, but it didn't do it properly. This was probably simple: the library that provides the symbol was not added to the command line.

Please note three important rules concerning linkage in POSIX:

  • Dynamic libraries have defined dependencies, so only libraries from the top-dependency should be supplied in whatever order (although after the static libraries)
  • Static libraries have just undefined symbols - it's up to you to know their dependencies and supply all of them in the command line
  • The order in static libraries is always: requester first, provider follows. Otherwise you'll get undefined symbol message, just like when you forgot to add the library to the command line
  • When you specify the library with -l<name>, you never know whether it will take lib<name>.so or lib<name>.a. The dynamic library is preferred, if found, and static libraries only can be enforced by compiler option - that's all. And whether you have any problems as above, it depends on whether you had static or dynamic libraries
  • Well, sometimes the dependencies may be lacking in dynamic libraries :D

Solution 5 - Gcc

I also encountered same problem. I do not know why, i just add -lpthread option to compiler and everything ok.

Old:

$ g++ -rdynamic -m64 -fPIE -pie  -o /tmp/node/out/Release/mksnapshot ...*.o *.a -ldl -lrt

got following error. If i append -lpthread option to above command then OK.

/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/node/out/Release/obj.host/v8_libbase/deps/v8/src/base/platform/condition-variable.o: undefined reference to symbol 'pthread_condattr_setclock@@GLIBC_2.3.3'
//lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0: error adding symbols: DSO missing from command line
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

Solution 6 - Gcc

I found I had the same error. I was compiling a code with both lapack and blas. When I switched the order that the two libraries were called the error went away.

"LAPACK_LIB = -llapack -lblas" worked where "LAPACK_LIB = -lblas -llapack" gave the error described above.

Solution 7 - Gcc

What I have found is that sometimes the library that the linker complains about is not the one causing the problem. Possibly there is a clever way to work out where the problem is but this is what I do:

  • Comment out all the linked libraries in the link command.
  • Clean out all .o's, .so's etc (Usually make clean is enough, but you may want to run a recursive find + rm, or something similar).
  • Uncomment the libraries in the link command one at a time and re-arrange the order as necessary.

@peter karasev: I have come across the same problem with a gcc 4.8.2 cmake project on CentOS7. The order of the libraries in "target_link_libraries" section is important. I guess cmake just passes the list on to the linker as-is, i.e. it doesn't try and work out the correct order. This is reasonable - when you think about it cmake can't know what the correct order is until the linking is successfully completed.

Solution 8 - Gcc

If you are using CMake, there are some ways that you could solve it:

Solution 1: The most elegant one

add_executable(...)
target_include_directories(...)
target_link_libraries(target_name pthread)

Solution 2: using CMake find_package

find_package(Threads REQUIRED) # this will generate the flag for CMAKE_THREAD_LIBS_INIT

add_executable(...)
target_include_directories(...)
target_link_libraries(target_name ${CMAKE_THREAD_LIBS_INIT})

Solution 3: Change CMake flags

# e.g. with C++ 17, change to other version if you need
set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD 17)
set(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS "${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS} -std=c++17 -pthread")

Solution 9 - Gcc

Please add: CFLAGS="-lrt" and LDFLAGS="-lrt"

Solution 10 - Gcc

When working with code that uses mathematical functions, you should also link them. In my Case when compiling I provided the following, which worked for me.

mpicc -o testname testname.c -lm

Solution 11 - Gcc

The same problem happened to me when I use distcc to make my c++ project; Finally I solved it with export CXX="distcc g++".

Solution 12 - Gcc

Try to add -pthread at the end of the library list in the Makefile.

It worked for me.

Solution 13 - Gcc

if you are using cmake and used pthreads, try add the following lines

find_package(Threads)
target_link_libraries(${CMAKE_THREAD_LIBS_INIT})

Solution 14 - Gcc

The same thing happened to me as I was installing the HPCC benchmark (includes HPL and a few other benchmarks). I added -lm to the compiler flags in my build script and then it successfully compiled.

Solution 15 - Gcc

If using g++, make sure that you are not running gcc instead

Solution 16 - Gcc

Compile with g++ instead. It has worked in my case switching from gcc to g++.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionjaeyongView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - GccMichael PankovView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - GccKevinView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - GcctextshellView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - GccEthourisView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - Gccosexp2003View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - Gccuser3112632View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - GccAhrBView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - GccbiendltbView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - Gcc劉大為View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 10 - GccNiroshan RatnayakeView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 11 - GccJason GengView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 12 - GccRickyView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 13 - Gccbowman hanView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 14 - GccJon DohView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 15 - GccMartin R.View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 16 - GccalienflowView Answer on Stackoverflow