Does a finally block always run?

JavaFinally

Java Problem Overview


Is there any condition where finally might not run in java? Thanks.

Java Solutions


Solution 1 - Java

from the Sun Tutorials

> Note: If the JVM exits while the try > or catch code is being executed, then > the finally block may not execute. > Likewise, if the thread executing the > try or catch code is interrupted or > killed, the finally block may not > execute even though the application as > a whole continues.

I don't know of any other ways the finally block wouldn't execute...

Solution 2 - Java

System.exit shuts down the Virtual Machine.

> Terminates the currently running Java > Virtual Machine. The argument serves > as a status code; by convention, a > nonzero status code indicates abnormal > termination. > > This method calls the exit method in > class Runtime. This method never > returns normally.

	try {
		System.out.println("hello");
		System.exit(0);
	}
	finally {
		System.out.println("bye");
	} // try-finally

"bye" does not print out in above code.

Solution 3 - Java

Just to expand on what others have said, anything that does not cause something like the JVM exiting will incur the finally block. So the following method:

public static int Stupid() {
  try {
    return 0;
  }
  finally {
    return 1;
  }
}

will strangely both compile and return 1.

Solution 4 - Java

Related to System.exit, there are also certain types of catastrophic failure where a finally block may not execute. If the JVM runs out of memory entirely, it may just exit without catch or finally happening.

Specifically, I remember a project where we foolishly tried to use

catch (OutOfMemoryError oome) {
    // do stuff
}

This didn't work because the JVM had no memory left for executing the catch block.

Solution 5 - Java

try { for (;;); } finally { System.err.println("?"); }

In that case the finally will not execute (unless the deprecated Thread.stop is called, or an equivalent, say, through a tools interface).

Solution 6 - Java

The Sun tutorial has been wrongly quoted here in this thread.

Note: If the JVM exits while the try or catch code is being executed, then the finally block will not execute. Likewise, if the thread executing the try or catch code is interrupted or killed, the finally block will not execute even though the application as a whole continues.

If you look into sun tutorial closely for finally block, it doesn't say "will not execute" but "may not execute" Here is the correct description

>Note: If the JVM exits while the try or catch code is being executed, then the finally block may not execute. Likewise, if the thread executing the try or catch code is interrupted or killed, the finally block may not execute even though the application as a whole continues.

The apparent reason for this behavior is, call to system.exit() is processed in a runtime system thread which may take time to shutdown the jvm, meanwhile thread scheduler can ask finally to execute. So finally is designed to always execute, but if you are shutting down jvm, it may happen that jvm shuts down prior to finally getting being executed.

Solution 7 - Java

Also if a deadlock/livelock happens inside try block.

Here's the code that demonstrates it:

public class DeadLocker {
	private static class SampleRunnable implements Runnable {
		private String threadId;
		private Object lock1;
		private Object lock2;
		
		public SampleRunnable(String threadId, Object lock1, Object lock2) {
			super();
			this.threadId = threadId;
			this.lock1 = lock1;
			this.lock2 = lock2;
		}

		@Override
		public void run() {
			try {
				synchronized (lock1) {
					System.out.println(threadId + " inside lock1");
					Thread.sleep(1000);
					synchronized (lock2) {
						System.out.println(threadId + " inside lock2");
					}
				}
			} catch (Exception e) {
			} finally {
				System.out.println("finally");
			}
		}
		
	}
	
	public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
		Object ob1 = new Object();
		Object ob2 = new Object();
		Thread t1 = new Thread(new SampleRunnable("t1", ob1, ob2));
		Thread t2 = new Thread(new SampleRunnable("t2", ob2, ob1));
		t1.start();
		t2.start();
	}
}

This code produces the following output:

t1 inside lock1
t2 inside lock1

and "finally" never gets printed

Solution 8 - Java

If the JVM exits while the try or catch code is being executed, then the finally block may not execute. (source)

Normal Shutdown - this occurs either when the last non-daemon thread exits OR when Runtime.exit() (source)

When a thread exits, the JVM performs an inventory of running threads, and if the only threads that are left are daemon threads, it initiates an orderly shutdown. When the JVM halts, any remaining daemon threads are abandoned finally blocks are not executed, stacks are not unwound the JVM just exits. Daemon threads should be used sparingly few processing activities can be safely abandoned at any time with no cleanup. In particular, it is dangerous to use daemon threads for tasks that might perform any sort of I/O. Daemon threads are best saved for "housekeeping" tasks, such as a background thread that periodically removes expired entries from an in-memory cache. (source)

Last non-daemon thread exits example:

public class TestDaemon {
	private static Runnable runnable = new Runnable() {
		@Override
		public void run() {
			try {
				while (true) {
					System.out.println("Is alive");
					Thread.sleep(10);
					// throw new RuntimeException();
				}
			} catch (Throwable t) {
				t.printStackTrace();
			} finally {
				System.out.println("This will never be executed.");
			}
		}
	};
	
	public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
		Thread daemon = new Thread(runnable);
		daemon.setDaemon(true);
		daemon.start();
		Thread.sleep(100);
		// daemon.stop();
		System.out.println("Last non-daemon thread exits.");
	}
}

Output:

Is alive
Is alive
Is alive
Is alive
Is alive
Is alive
Is alive
Is alive
Is alive
Is alive
Last non-daemon thread exits.
Is alive
Is alive
Is alive
Is alive
Is alive

Solution 9 - Java

In following cases, finally block will not be executed :-

  • When System.exit(0) is invoked from try block.
  • When JVM runs out of memory
  • When your java process is killed forcefully from task mgr or console
  • Deadlock condition in your try block
  • When your machine shuts down due power failure

There may also be other fringe cases, where finally block will not be executed.

Solution 10 - Java

There are two ways to stop finally block code execution:

  1. Use System.exit();

  2. If somehow execution control don't reach to try block.
    See:

    public class Main { public static void main (String[]args) { if(true){ System.out.println("will exceute"); }else{ try{ System.out.println("result = "+5/0); }catch(ArithmeticException e){ System.out.println("will not exceute"); }finally{ System.out.println("will not exceute");
    } } } }

Solution 11 - Java

I've come across a very specific case of the finally block not executing related specifically to the play framework.

I was surprised to find that the finally block in this controller action code only got called after an Exception, but never when the call actually succeeded.

try {
    InputStream is = getInputStreamMethod();
    renderBinary(is, "out.zip");
catch (Exception e) {
    e.printStackTrace();
} finally {
    cleanUp();
}

Perhaps the thread is terminated or something when renderBinary() is called. I would suspect the same thing happens for other render() calls, but I didn't verify it.

I solved the problem by moving the renderBinary() to after the try/catch. Further investigation revealed that play provides an @Finally annotation to create a method that gets executed after a controller action executes. The caveat here is that this will get called after the execution of ANY action in the controller, so it may not always be a good choice.

Solution 12 - Java

//If ArithmeticException Occur Inner finally would not be executed
class Temp
{
    public static void main(String[] s)
    {
    	try
	    {
	    int x = 10/s.length;
	    System.out.println(x);
	    try
		    {
		    	int z[] = new int[s.length];
		    	z[10] = 1000;
	    	}catch(ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException e)
		    {
		    	System.out.println(e);
		    }
	     finally
	    {
	    	System.out.println("Inner finally");
	    }
		}
		catch(ArithmeticException e)
		{
			System.out.println(e);
		}
	finally 
	{
		System.out.println("Outer Finally"); 
	}
	
System.out.println("Remaining Code");	
}
}

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionWarriorView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - JavahhafezView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - JavaEugene YokotaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - JavaDaniel NadasiView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - JavaZarkonnenView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - JavaTom Hawtin - tacklineView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - JavasaurabhView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - JavawhelephView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - JavaMikeView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - JavaMangu Singh RajpurohitView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 10 - JavaAagam JainView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 11 - JavaJeremy GoodellView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 12 - JavaShyam AroraView Answer on Stackoverflow