Declaring styleable attributes in Android

There's precious little documentation about the declare-styleable tag by which we can declare custom styles for components. I did find this list of valid values for the format attribute of the attr tag. While that's nice as far as it goes, it doesn't explain how to use some of those values. Browsing attr.xml (the Android source for the standard attributes), I discovered that you can do things like:

<!-- The most prominent text color.  -->
<attr name="textColorPrimary" format="reference|color" />

The format attribute can evidently be set to a combination of values. Presumably the format attribute helps the parser interpret an actual style value. Then I discovered this in attr.xml:

<!-- Default text typeface. -->
<attr name="typeface">
    <enum name="normal" value="0" />
    <enum name="sans" value="1" />
    <enum name="serif" value="2" />
    <enum name="monospace" value="3" />
</attr>

<!-- Default text typeface style. -->
<attr name="textStyle">
    <flag name="normal" value="0" />
    <flag name="bold" value="1" />
    <flag name="italic" value="2" />
</attr>

Both of these seem to declare a set of allowed values for the indicated style.

So I have two questions:

1. What's the difference between a style attribute that can take on one of a set of enum values and one that can take on a set of flag values?
2. Does anyone know of any better documentation for how declare-styleable works (other than reverse engineering the Android source code)?

There's this question here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3441396/android-defining-custom-attrs with some info, but not much.

And this post . It has good info about flags and enums:

> Custom XML Attribute Flags > > Flags are special attribute types in > that they are allowed only a very > small subset of values, namely those > that are defined underneath the > attribute tag. Flags are specified by > a “name” attribute and a “value” > attribute. The names are required to > be unique within that attribute type > but the values need not be. This is > the reason that during the evolution > of the Android platform we had > “fill_parent” and “match_parent” both > mapping to the same behavior. Their > values were identical. > > The name attribute maps to the name > used in the value place within the > layout XML and does not require a > namespace prefix. Hence, for the > “tilingMode” above I chose “center” as > the attribute value. I could have > just as easily chosen “stretched” or > “repeating” but nothing else. Not > even substituting in the actual values > would have been allowed. > > The value attribute must be an > integer. The choice of hexadecimal or > standard numeral representation is up > to you. There’s a few places within > the Android code where both are used > and the Android compiler is happy to > accept either. > > Custom XML Attribute Enums > > Enums are used in an almost identical > manner as flags with one provision, > they may be used interchangeably with > integers. Under the hood Enums and > Integers are mapped to the same data > type, namely, an Integer. When > appearing in the attribute definition > with Integers, Enums serve to prevent > “magic numbers” which are always bad. > This is why you can have an > “android:layout_width” with either a > dimension, integer, or named string > “fill_parent.” > > To put this into context, let’s > suppose that I create a custom > attribute called > “layout_scroll_height” which accepts > either an integer or a string > “scroll_to_top.” To do so I’d add an > “integer” format attribute and follow > that with the enum: > >
> > > > The one stipulation when using Enums > in this manner is that a developer > using your custom View could > purposefully place the value “-1″ into > the layout parameters. This would > trigger the special case logic of > “scroll_to_top.” Such unexpected (or > expected) behavior could quickly > relegate your library to the “legacy > code” pile if the Enum values were > chosen poorly.

---

As I see it, the real values you can add in reality to an attribute is limited by what you can obtain from it. Check the AttributeSet class reference here for more hints.

You can obtain:

• booleans (getAttributeBooleanValue),
• floats (getAttributeFloatValue),
• ints (getAttributeIntValue),
• ints (as getAttributeUnsignedIntValue),
• and strings (getAttributeValue)

@Aleadam 's answer is very helpful, but imho it omits one major difference between enum and flag. The former is intented for us to pick one, and only one value when we assign the corresponding attribute for some View. The latter's values can be combined, however, using the bitwise OR operator.

An example, in res/values/attr.xml

<!-- declare myenum attribute -->
<attr name="myenum">
    <enum name="zero" value="0" />
    <enum name="one" value="1" />
    <enum name="two" value="2" />
    <enum name="three" value="3" />
</attr>

<!-- declare myflags attribute -->
<attr name="myflags">
    <flag name="one" value="1" />
    <flag name="two" value="2" />
    <flag name="four" value="4" />
    <flag name="eight" value="8" />
</attr>

<!-- declare our custom widget to be styleable by these attributes -->
<declare-styleable name="com.example.MyWidget">
    <attr name="myenum" />
    <attr name="myflags" />
</declare-styleable>

In res/layout/mylayout.xml we can now do

<com.example.MyWidget
    myenum="two"
    myflags="one|two"
    ... />

So an enum selects one of its possible values, while flags can be combined. The numerical values should reflect this difference, typically you'll want the sequence to go 0,1,2,3,... for enums (to be used as array indices, say) and flags to go 1,2,4,8,... so they can be independently added or removed, using bitwise OR | to combine flags.

We could explicitly define "meta flags" with values that are not a power of 2, and thus introduce a kind of shorthand for common combinations. For instance, if we had included this in our myflags declaration

<flag name="three" value="3" />

then we could have written myflags="three" in stead of myflags="one|two", for completely identical results as 3 == 1|2.

Personally, I like to always include

<flag name="none" value="0" /> <!-- or "normal, "regular", and so on -->
<flag name="all" value="15" /> <!-- 15 == 1|2|4|8 -->

which will allow me to unset or set all flags at once.

More subtly, it might be the case that one flag is implied by another. So, in our example, suppose that the eight flag being set should force the four flag to be set (if it wasn't already). We could then re-define eight to pre-include, as it were, the four flag,

<flag name="eight" value="12" /> <!-- 12 == 8|4 -->

Finally, if you are declaring the attributes in a library project but want to apply them in layouts of another project (dependent on the lib), you'll need to use a namespace prefix which you must bind in the XML root element. E.g.,

<RelativeLayout
    xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
    xmlns:auto="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res-auto"
    ... >
    
    <com.example.MyWidget
        auto:myenum="two"
        auto:myflags="one|two"
        ... />
    
</RelativeLayout>