Combine multiple Collections into a single logical Collection?
JavaCollectionsGuavaJava Problem Overview
Assume, I have a constant number of collections (e.g. 3 ArrayLists) as members of a class. Now, I want to expose all the elements to other classes so they can simply iterate over all elements (ideally, read only). I'm using guava collections and I wonder how I could use guava iterables/iterators to generate a logical view on the internal collections without making temporary copies.
Java Solutions
Solution 1 - Java
With Guava, you can use Iterables.concat(Iterable<T> ...)
, it creates a live view of all the iterables, concatenated into one (if you change the iterables, the concatenated version also changes). Then wrap the concatenated iterable with Iterables.unmodifiableIterable(Iterable<T>)
(I hadn't seen the read-only requirement earlier).
From the Iterables.concat( .. )
JavaDocs:
> Combines multiple iterables into a
> single iterable. The returned iterable
> has an iterator that traverses the
> elements of each iterable in inputs.
> The input iterators are not polled
> until necessary. The returned
> iterable's iterator supports remove()
> when the corresponding input iterator
> supports it.
While this doesn't explicitly say that this is a live view, the last sentence implies that it is (supporting the Iterator.remove()
method only if the backing iterator supports it is not possible unless using a live view)
Sample Code:
final List<Integer> first = Lists.newArrayList(1, 2, 3);
final List<Integer> second = Lists.newArrayList(4, 5, 6);
final List<Integer> third = Lists.newArrayList(7, 8, 9);
final Iterable<Integer> all =
Iterables.unmodifiableIterable(
Iterables.concat(first, second, third));
System.out.println(all);
third.add(9999999);
System.out.println(all);
Output:
> [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
> [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 9999999]
Edit:
By Request from Damian, here's a similar method that returns a live Collection View
public final class CollectionsX {
static class JoinedCollectionView<E> implements Collection<E> {
private final Collection<? extends E>[] items;
public JoinedCollectionView(final Collection<? extends E>[] items) {
this.items = items;
}
@Override
public boolean addAll(final Collection<? extends E> c) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}
@Override
public void clear() {
for (final Collection<? extends E> coll : items) {
coll.clear();
}
}
@Override
public boolean contains(final Object o) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}
@Override
public boolean containsAll(final Collection<?> c) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}
@Override
public boolean isEmpty() {
return !iterator().hasNext();
}
@Override
public Iterator<E> iterator() {
return Iterables.concat(items).iterator();
}
@Override
public boolean remove(final Object o) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}
@Override
public boolean removeAll(final Collection<?> c) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}
@Override
public boolean retainAll(final Collection<?> c) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}
@Override
public int size() {
int ct = 0;
for (final Collection<? extends E> coll : items) {
ct += coll.size();
}
return ct;
}
@Override
public Object[] toArray() {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}
@Override
public <T> T[] toArray(T[] a) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}
@Override
public boolean add(E e) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}
}
/**
* Returns a live aggregated collection view of the collections passed in.
* <p>
* All methods except {@link Collection#size()}, {@link Collection#clear()},
* {@link Collection#isEmpty()} and {@link Iterable#iterator()}
* throw {@link UnsupportedOperationException} in the returned Collection.
* <p>
* None of the above methods is thread safe (nor would there be an easy way
* of making them).
*/
public static <T> Collection<T> combine(
final Collection<? extends T>... items) {
return new JoinedCollectionView<T>(items);
}
private CollectionsX() {
}
}
Solution 2 - Java
Plain Java 8 solutions using a Stream
.
Constant number
Assuming private Collection<T> c, c2, c3
.
One solution:
public Stream<T> stream() {
return Stream.concat(Stream.concat(c.stream(), c2.stream()), c3.stream());
}
Another solution:
public Stream<T> stream() {
return Stream.of(c, c2, c3).flatMap(Collection::stream);
}
Variable number
Assuming private Collection<Collection<T>> cs
:
public Stream<T> stream() {
return cs.stream().flatMap(Collection::stream);
}
Solution 3 - Java
If you're using at least Java 8, see my other answer.
If you're already using Google Guava, see Sean Patrick Floyd's answer.
If you're stuck at Java 7 and don't want to include Google Guava, you can write your own (read-only) Iterables.concat()
using no more than Iterable
and Iterator
:
Constant number
public static <E> Iterable<E> concat(final Iterable<? extends E> iterable1,
final Iterable<? extends E> iterable2) {
return new Iterable<E>() {
@Override
public Iterator<E> iterator() {
return new Iterator<E>() {
final Iterator<? extends E> iterator1 = iterable1.iterator();
final Iterator<? extends E> iterator2 = iterable2.iterator();
@Override
public boolean hasNext() {
return iterator1.hasNext() || iterator2.hasNext();
}
@Override
public E next() {
return iterator1.hasNext() ? iterator1.next() : iterator2.next();
}
};
}
};
}
Variable number
@SafeVarargs
public static <E> Iterable<E> concat(final Iterable<? extends E>... iterables) {
return concat(Arrays.asList(iterables));
}
public static <E> Iterable<E> concat(final Iterable<Iterable<? extends E>> iterables) {
return new Iterable<E>() {
final Iterator<Iterable<? extends E>> iterablesIterator = iterables.iterator();
@Override
public Iterator<E> iterator() {
return !iterablesIterator.hasNext() ? Collections.emptyIterator()
: new Iterator<E>() {
Iterator<? extends E> iterableIterator = nextIterator();
@Override
public boolean hasNext() {
return iterableIterator.hasNext();
}
@Override
public E next() {
final E next = iterableIterator.next();
findNext();
return next;
}
Iterator<? extends E> nextIterator() {
return iterablesIterator.next().iterator();
}
Iterator<E> findNext() {
while (!iterableIterator.hasNext()) {
if (!iterablesIterator.hasNext()) {
break;
}
iterableIterator = nextIterator();
}
return this;
}
}.findNext();
}
};
}
Solution 4 - Java
You could create a new List
and addAll()
of your other List
s to it. Then return an unmodifiable list with Collections.unmodifiableList()
.
Solution 5 - Java
Here is my solution for that:
EDIT - changed code a little bit
public static <E> Iterable<E> concat(final Iterable<? extends E> list1, Iterable<? extends E> list2)
{
return new Iterable<E>()
{
public Iterator<E> iterator()
{
return new Iterator<E>()
{
protected Iterator<? extends E> listIterator = list1.iterator();
protected Boolean checkedHasNext;
protected E nextValue;
private boolean startTheSecond;
public void theNext()
{
if (listIterator.hasNext())
{
checkedHasNext = true;
nextValue = listIterator.next();
}
else if (startTheSecond)
checkedHasNext = false;
else
{
startTheSecond = true;
listIterator = list2.iterator();
theNext();
}
}
public boolean hasNext()
{
if (checkedHasNext == null)
theNext();
return checkedHasNext;
}
public E next()
{
if (!hasNext())
throw new NoSuchElementException();
checkedHasNext = null;
return nextValue;
}
public void remove()
{
listIterator.remove();
}
};
}
};
}