Coalesce values from 2 columns into a single column in a pandas dataframe

PythonPandasNumpyDataframe

Python Problem Overview


I'm looking for a method that behaves similarly to coalesce in T-SQL. I have 2 columns (column A and B) that are sparsely populated in a pandas dataframe. I'd like to create a new column using the following rules:

  1. If the value in column A is not null, use that value for the new column C
  2. If the value in column A is null, use the value in column B for the new column C

Like I mentioned, this can be accomplished in MS SQL Server via the coalesce function. I haven't found a good pythonic method for this; does one exist?

Python Solutions


Solution 1 - Python

use combine_first():

In [16]: df = pd.DataFrame(np.random.randint(0, 10, size=(10, 2)), columns=list('ab'))

In [17]: df.loc[::2, 'a'] = np.nan

In [18]: df
Out[18]:
     a  b
0  NaN  0
1  5.0  5
2  NaN  8
3  2.0  8
4  NaN  3
5  9.0  4
6  NaN  7
7  2.0  0
8  NaN  6
9  2.0  5

In [19]: df['c'] = df.a.combine_first(df.b)

In [20]: df
Out[20]:
     a  b    c
0  NaN  0  0.0
1  5.0  5  5.0
2  NaN  8  8.0
3  2.0  8  2.0
4  NaN  3  3.0
5  9.0  4  9.0
6  NaN  7  7.0
7  2.0  0  2.0
8  NaN  6  6.0
9  2.0  5  2.0

Solution 2 - Python

Coalesce for multiple columns with DataFrame.bfill

All these methods work for two columns and are fine with maybe three columns, but they all require method chaining if you have n columns when n > 2:

example dataframe:

import numpy as np
import pandas as pd

df = pd.DataFrame({'col1':[np.NaN, 2, 4, 5, np.NaN],
                   'col2':[np.NaN, 5, 1, 0, np.NaN],
                   'col3':[2, np.NaN, 9, 1, np.NaN],
                   'col4':[np.NaN, 10, 11, 4, 8]})

print(df)

   col1  col2  col3  col4
0   NaN   NaN   2.0   NaN
1   2.0   5.0   NaN  10.0
2   4.0   1.0   9.0  11.0
3   5.0   0.0   1.0   4.0
4   NaN   NaN   NaN   8.0

Using DataFrame.bfill over the index axis (axis=1) we can get the values in a generalized way even for a big n amount of columns

Plus, this would also work for string type columns !!

df['coalesce'] = df.bfill(axis=1).iloc[:, 0]

   col1  col2  col3  col4  coalesce
0   NaN   NaN   2.0   NaN       2.0
1   2.0   5.0   NaN  10.0       2.0
2   4.0   1.0   9.0  11.0       4.0
3   5.0   0.0   1.0   4.0       5.0
4   NaN   NaN   NaN   8.0       8.0

Using the Series.combine_first (accepted answer), it can get quite cumbersome and would eventually be undoable when amount of columns grow

df['coalesce'] = (
    df['col1'].combine_first(df['col2'])
        .combine_first(df['col3'])
        .combine_first(df['col4'])
)

   col1  col2  col3  col4  coalesce
0   NaN   NaN   2.0   NaN       2.0
1   2.0   5.0   NaN  10.0       2.0
2   4.0   1.0   9.0  11.0       4.0
3   5.0   0.0   1.0   4.0       5.0
4   NaN   NaN   NaN   8.0       8.0

Solution 3 - Python

Try this also.. easier to remember:

df['c'] = np.where(df["a"].isnull(), df["b"], df["a"] )

This is slighty faster: df['c'] = np.where(df["a"].isnull() == True, df["b"], df["a"] )

%timeit df['d'] = df.a.combine_first(df.b)
1000 loops, best of 3: 472 µs per loop


%timeit  df['c'] = np.where(df["a"].isnull(), df["b"], df["a"] )
1000 loops, best of 3: 291 µs per loop

Solution 4 - Python

combine_first is the most straightforward option. There are a couple of others which I outline below. I'm going to outline a few more solutions, some applicable to different cases.

Case #1: Non-mutually Exclusive NaNs

Not all rows have NaNs, and these NaNs are not mutually exclusive between columns.

df = pd.DataFrame({
    'a': [1.0, 2.0, 3.0, np.nan, 5.0, 7.0, np.nan],
    'b': [5.0, 3.0, np.nan, 4.0, np.nan, 6.0, 7.0]})      
df

     a    b
0  1.0  5.0
1  2.0  3.0
2  3.0  NaN
3  NaN  4.0
4  5.0  NaN
5  7.0  6.0
6  NaN  7.0

Let's combine first on a.

Series.mask

df['a'].mask(pd.isnull, df['b'])
# df['a'].mask(df['a'].isnull(), df['b'])

0    1.0
1    2.0
2    3.0
3    4.0
4    5.0
5    7.0
6    7.0
Name: a, dtype: float64

Series.where

df['a'].where(pd.notnull, df['b'])

0    1.0
1    2.0
2    3.0
3    4.0
4    5.0
5    7.0
6    7.0
Name: a, dtype: float64

You can use similar syntax using np.where.

Alternatively, to combine first on b, switch the conditions around.


Case #2: Mutually Exclusive Positioned NaNs

All rows have NaNs which are mutually exclusive between columns.

df = pd.DataFrame({
    'a': [1.0, 2.0, 3.0, np.nan, 5.0, np.nan, np.nan],
    'b': [np.nan, np.nan, np.nan, 4.0, np.nan, 6.0, 7.0]})
df

     a    b
0  1.0  NaN
1  2.0  NaN
2  3.0  NaN
3  NaN  4.0
4  5.0  NaN
5  NaN  6.0
6  NaN  7.0

Series.update

This method works in-place, modifying the original DataFrame. This is an efficient option for this use case.

df['b'].update(df['a'])
# Or, to update "a" in-place,
# df['a'].update(df['b'])
df

     a    b
0  1.0  1.0
1  2.0  2.0
2  3.0  3.0
3  NaN  4.0
4  5.0  5.0
5  NaN  6.0
6  NaN  7.0

Series.add

df['a'].add(df['b'], fill_value=0)

0    1.0
1    2.0
2    3.0
3    4.0
4    5.0
5    6.0
6    7.0
dtype: float64

DataFrame.fillna + DataFrame.sum

df.fillna(0).sum(1)

0    1.0
1    2.0
2    3.0
3    4.0
4    5.0
5    6.0
6    7.0
dtype: float64

Solution 5 - Python

I encountered this problem with but wanted to coalesce multiple columns, picking the first non-null from several columns. I found the following helpful:

Build dummy data

import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame({'a1': [None, 2, 3, None],
                   'a2': [2, None, 4, None],
                   'a3': [4, 5, None, None],
                   'a4': [None, None, None, None],
                   'b1': [9, 9, 9, 999]})

df
    a1   a2   a3    a4   b1
0  NaN  2.0  4.0  None    9
1  2.0  NaN  5.0  None    9
2  3.0  4.0  NaN  None    9
3  NaN  NaN  NaN  None  999

coalesce a1 a2, a3 into a new column A

def get_first_non_null(dfrow, columns_to_search):
    for c in columns_to_search:
        if pd.notnull(dfrow[c]):
            return dfrow[c]
    return None

# sample usage:
cols_to_search = ['a1', 'a2', 'a3']
df['A'] = df.apply(lambda x: get_first_non_null(x, cols_to_search), axis=1)

print(df)
    a1   a2   a3    a4   b1    A
0  NaN  2.0  4.0  None    9  2.0
1  2.0  NaN  5.0  None    9  2.0
2  3.0  4.0  NaN  None    9  3.0
3  NaN  NaN  NaN  None  999  NaN

Solution 6 - Python

I'm thinking a solution like this,

def coalesce(s: pd.Series, *series: List[pd.Series]):
    """coalesce the column information like a SQL coalesce."""
    for other in series:
        s = s.mask(pd.isnull, other)        
    return s

because given a DataFrame with columns with ['a', 'b', 'c'], you can use it like a SQL coalesce,

df['d'] = coalesce(df.a, df.b, df.c)

Solution 7 - Python

For a more general case, where there are no NaNs but you want the same behavior:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55977037/merge-left-but-override-right-values-where-possible

Solution 8 - Python

Good code, put you have a typo for python 3, correct one looks like this

    """coalesce the column information like a SQL coalesce."""
    for other in series:
        s = s.mask(pd.isnull, other)        
    return s

Solution 9 - Python

Consider using DuckDB for efficient SQL on Pandas. It's performant, simple, and feature-packed. https://duckdb.org/2021/05/14/sql-on-pandas.html

Sample Dataframe:

import numpy as np
import pandas as pd

df = pd.DataFrame({'A':[1,np.NaN, 3, 4, 5],
                   'B':[np.NaN, 2, 3, 4, np.NaN]})

Coalesce using DuckDB:

import duckdb
out_df = duckdb.query("""SELECT A,B,coalesce(A,B) as C from df""").to_df()
print(out_df)

Output:

     A    B    c
0  1.0  NaN  1.0
1  NaN  2.0  2.0
2  3.0  3.0  3.0
3  4.0  4.0  4.0
4  5.0  NaN  5.0

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionSevynsView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - PythonMaxU - stop genocide of UAView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - PythonErfanView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - PythonMerlinView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - Pythoncs95View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - PythonDavid SmithView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - PythonChristian DiMareView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - PythonCilantro DitrekView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - PythonStefan VoshageView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - PythonRavishankar SivasubramaniamView Answer on Stackoverflow