Can I use CASE statement in a JOIN condition?

SqlSql ServerJoinCase

Sql Problem Overview


The following image is a part of Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2 System Views. From the image we can see that the relationship between sys.partitions and sys.allocation_units depends on the value of sys.allocation_units.type. So to join them together I would write something similar to this:

SELECT  *
FROM    sys.indexes i
        JOIN sys.partitions p
            ON i.index_id = p.index_id 
        JOIN sys.allocation_units a
            ON CASE
               WHEN a.type IN (1, 3)
                   THEN a.container_id = p.hobt_id 
               WHEN a.type IN (2)
                   THEN a.container_id = p.partition_id
               END 

But the upper code gives a syntax error. I guess that's because of the CASE statement. Can anyone help to explain a little?


Add error message:

> Msg 102, Level 15, State 1, Line 6 Incorrect syntax near '='.

this is the image

Sql Solutions


Solution 1 - Sql

A CASE expression returns a value from the THEN portion of the clause. You could use it thusly:

SELECT  * 
FROM    sys.indexes i 
    JOIN sys.partitions p 
        ON i.index_id = p.index_id  
    JOIN sys.allocation_units a 
        ON CASE 
           WHEN a.type IN (1, 3) AND a.container_id = p.hobt_id THEN 1
           WHEN a.type IN (2) AND a.container_id = p.partition_id THEN 1
           ELSE 0
           END = 1

Note that you need to do something with the returned value, e.g. compare it to 1. Your statement attempted to return the value of an assignment or test for equality, neither of which make sense in the context of a CASE/THEN clause. (If BOOLEAN was a datatype then the test for equality would make sense.)

Solution 2 - Sql

> Instead, you simply JOIN to both tables, and in your SELECT clause, > return data from the one that matches:

I suggest you to go through this link Conditional Joins in SQL Server and https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8361183/t-sql-case-statement-in-a-join-on-clause

e.g.

    SELECT  *
FROM    sys.indexes i
        JOIN sys.partitions p
            ON i.index_id = p.index_id 
        JOIN sys.allocation_units a
            ON a.container_id =
			CASE
               WHEN a.type IN (1, 3)
                   THEN  p.hobt_id 
               WHEN a.type IN (2)
                   THEN p.partition_id
               END 

Edit: As per comments.

> You can not specify the join condition as you are doing.. Check the > query above that have no error. I have take out the common column up > and the right column value will be evaluated on condition.

Solution 3 - Sql

Try this:

...JOIN sys.allocation_units a ON 
  (a.type=2 AND a.container_id = p.partition_id)
  OR (a.type IN (1, 3) AND a.container_id = p.hobt_id)

Solution 4 - Sql

I think you need two case statements:

SELECT  *
FROM    sys.indexes i
    JOIN sys.partitions p
        ON i.index_id = p.index_id 
    JOIN sys.allocation_units a
        ON 
        -- left side of join on statement
            CASE
               WHEN a.type IN (1, 3)
                   THEN a.container_id
               WHEN a.type IN (2)
                   THEN a.container_id
            END 
        = 
        -- right side of join on statement
            CASE
               WHEN a.type IN (1, 3)
                   THEN p.hobt_id
               WHEN a.type IN (2)
                   THEN p.partition_id
            END             

This is because:

  • the CASE statement returns a single value at the END
  • the ON statement compares two values
  • your CASE statement was doing the comparison inside of the CASE statement. I would guess that if you put your CASE statement in your SELECT you would get a boolean '1' or '0' indicating whether the CASE statement evaluated to True or False

Solution 5 - Sql

Yes, you can. Here is an example.

SELECT a.*
FROM TableA a
LEFT OUTER JOIN TableB j1 ON  (CASE WHEN LEN(COALESCE(a.NoBatiment, '')) = 3 
								THEN RTRIM(a.NoBatiment) + '0' 
								ELSE a.NoBatiment END ) = j1.ColumnName 

Solution 6 - Sql

I took your example and edited it:

SELECT  *
FROM    sys.indexes i
    JOIN sys.partitions p
        ON i.index_id = p.index_id 
    JOIN sys.allocation_units a
        ON a.container_id = (CASE
           WHEN a.type IN (1, 3)
               THEN p.hobt_id 
           WHEN a.type IN (2)
               THEN p.partition_id
           ELSE NULL
           END)

Solution 7 - Sql

This seems nice

https://bytes.com/topic/sql-server/answers/881862-joining-different-tables-based-condition

FROM YourMainTable
LEFT JOIN AirportCity DepCity ON @TravelType = 'A' and DepFrom =  DepCity.Code
LEFT JOIN AirportCity DepCity ON @TravelType = 'B' and SomeOtherColumn = SomeOtherColumnFromSomeOtherTable

Solution 8 - Sql

Here I have compared the difference in two different result sets:

SELECT main.ColumnName, compare.Value PreviousValue,  main.Value CurrentValue
FROM 
(
	SELECT 'Name' AS ColumnName, 'John' as Value UNION ALL
	SELECT 'UserName' AS ColumnName, 'jh001' as Value UNION ALL
	SELECT 'Department' AS ColumnName, 'HR' as Value UNION ALL
	SELECT 'Phone' AS ColumnName, NULL as Value UNION ALL
	SELECT 'DOB' AS ColumnName, '1993-01-01' as Value UNION ALL
	SELECT 'CreateDate' AS ColumnName, '2017-01-01' as Value UNION ALL
	SELECT 'IsActive' AS ColumnName, '1' as Value
) main
INNER JOIN
(
	SELECT 'Name' AS ColumnName, 'Rahul' as Value UNION ALL
	SELECT 'UserName' AS ColumnName, 'rh001' as Value UNION ALL
	SELECT 'Department' AS ColumnName, 'HR' as Value UNION ALL
	SELECT 'Phone' AS ColumnName, '01722112233' as Value UNION ALL
	SELECT 'DOB' AS ColumnName, '1993-01-01' as Value UNION ALL
	SELECT 'CreateDate' AS ColumnName, '2017-01-01' as Value UNION ALL
	SELECT 'IsActive' AS ColumnName, '1' as Value
) compare
ON main.ColumnName = compare.ColumnName AND
CASE 
    WHEN main.Value IS NULL AND compare.Value IS NULL THEN 0
    WHEN main.Value IS NULL AND compare.Value IS NOT NULL THEN 1
    WHEN main.Value IS NOT NULL AND compare.Value IS NULL THEN 1
    WHEN main.Value <> compare.Value THEN 1
END = 1 

Solution 9 - Sql

There are at least 2 ways to join based on condition. One is faster than the other:

declare @loopZaKosovnice int = 1
select * 
from tHE_MoveItem mi 
left join tHE_SetProdSt st on st.acIdent = mi.acIdent

-- slow
--join the_setitem si on si.acident = case when @loopZaKosovnice = 0 then mi.acident else st.acIdentChild end 

-- two times as fast
left join the_setitem si1 on @loopZaKosovnice = 0 and si1.acident = mi.acident
left join the_setitem si2 on @loopZaKosovnice = 1 and si2.acident = st.acIdentChild
join the_setitem si on si.acident = isnull (si1.acident, si2.acIdent)

Solution 10 - Sql

Took DonkeyKong's example.

The issue is I needed to use a declared variable. This allows for stating your left and right-hand side of what you need to compare. This is for supporting an SSRS report where different fields must be linked based on the selection by the user.

The initial case sets the field choice based on the selection and then I can set the field I need to match on for the join.

A second case statement could be added for the right-hand side if the variable is needed to choose from different fields

LEFT OUTER JOIN Dashboard_Group_Level_Matching ON
       case
         when @Level  = 'lvl1' then  cw.Lvl1
         when @Level  = 'lvl2' then  cw.Lvl2
         when @Level  = 'lvl3' then  cw.Lvl3
       end
    = Dashboard_Group_Level_Matching.Dashboard_Level_Name

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionJust a learnerView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - SqlHABOView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - SqlNiranjan SinghView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - SqlrichardtallentView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - SqlDonkeyKongView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - SqlStefan GaborView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - SqlGontView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - Sqluser4584103View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - SqlSheikh KawserView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - SqlTone ŠkodaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 10 - SqlKenneth WilsonView Answer on Stackoverflow