asp.net mvc put controllers into a separate project

asp.net Mvc

asp.net Mvc Problem Overview


I'm just learning asp.net mvc and I'm trying to figure out how to move my controllers into a separate project. Typically when I have designed asp.net web apps before, I created one project for my models, another for my logic, and then there was the web.

Now that I'm learning asp.net mvc I was hoping to follow a similar pattern and put the models and controllers each into their own separate projects, and just leave the views/scripts/css in the web. The models part was easy, but what I don't understand is how to make my controllers in a separate project be "found". Also, I would like to know if this is advisable. Thanks!

asp.net Mvc Solutions


Solution 1 - asp.net Mvc

First of all, it is certainly a good idea to put your model into a separate project. As you've discovered, this is trivial.

Regarding Controllers and Views, I don't see any obvious advantage to separating them for most basic projects, although you may have a particular need to do so in a particular application.

If you do choose to do this, then you will need to tell the framework how to find your controllers. The basic way to do this is by supplying your own ControllerFactory. You can take a look at the source code for the DefaultControllerFactory to get an idea for how this is done. Subtyping this class and overriding the GetControllerType(string controllerName) method may be enough to accomplish what you're asking.

Once you've created your own custom ControllerFactory, you add the following line to Application_Start in global.asax to tell the framework where to find it:

ControllerBuilder.Current.SetControllerFactory(new MyControllerFactory());

Update: Read [this post][1] and the posts it links to for more info. See also Phil Haack's comment on that post about:

ControllerBuilder.Current.DefaultNamespaces.Add(
    "ExternalAssembly.Controllers");

...which is not a complete solution, but possibly good enough for simple cases.

[1]: http://codeclimber.net.nz/archive/2008/11/14/how-to-call-controllers-in-external-assemblies-in-an-asp.net.aspx "How to call controllers in external assemblies in an ASP.NET MVC application"

Solution 2 - asp.net Mvc

While it is reasonable to create your own ControllerFactory, I found it more convenient to define all my Controllers in each project, but derive them from Controllers in my Shared project:

namespace MyProject1.Controllers
{
   public class MyController : MySharedProject.Controllers.MyController
   {
      // nothing much to do here...
   }
}

namespace MySharedProject.Controllers
{
   public abstract class MyController : System.Web.Mvc.Controller
   {
      // all (or most) of my controller logic here...
   }
}

This has the added benefit that you have a place to put your Controller logic that differs from project to project. Also, it is easier for other developers to quickly find your Controller logic because the Controllers exist in the standard place.

Regarding whether this is advisable, I think it absolutely is. I've created some common Account Management logic that I want to share between projects that otherwise have very different business logic. So I'm sharing my Account and Admin Controllers, but the other Controllers are specific to their respective projects.

Solution 3 - asp.net Mvc

  • Add the Class Library for your mvc project.

  • In the class add the following code(For u'r Controller Code)

     namespace ContactController
     {
     public class ContactController : Controller
     {
         public ActionResult Call()
         {
             ViewBag.Title = "Inside MyFirst Controller.";
             return View();
         }
     }
    

    }

  • On the mvc project view folder add the folder for Contact and create a Call.cshtml file. View Folder

  • Add the class library project reference into your main MVC project.

Reference

  • Finally to refer contact controller namespace into Route Config.

RouteConfig

Solution 4 - asp.net Mvc

My problem solved after I updated System.Web.Mvc NuGet reference so MvcWebsite and Class Library use same System.Web.Mvc version

No need to add default namespaces

Solution 5 - asp.net Mvc

The simplest form of separation I use is to retain the Views "as is" in the original MVC project but remove the Controllers. Then in a new ClassLibrary project add the Controller classes and ensure they inherit from Controller.

The MVC routing engine will automatically route to the Controllers in the ClassLibrary and the Controllers will automatically construct the Views from the original MVC project, provided you have your references and usings correctly in place.

I am using this architecture to implement an Html Reports module that can be compiled and deployed separately from the main solution. At last I am free from SSRS!

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionAaron PalmerView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - asp.net MvcCraig StuntzView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - asp.net MvcThisGuyView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - asp.net MvcMohan KumarView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - asp.net MvcHomayoun BehzadianView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - asp.net MvcJamieView Answer on Stackoverflow