Android ViewGroup crash: Attempt to read from field 'int android.view.View.mViewFlags' on a null object reference
JavaAndroidViewgroupJava Problem Overview
We have found several cases for this kind of crashes reported by backend logging monitoring. It seems the crashes do not tie to particular UX failure. And from the reports, there is no sign of how our own classes being involved(no sign of any of our classes names). Here is an example of typical crashes:
java.lang.NullPointerException: Attempt to read from field 'int android.view.View.mViewFlags' on a null object reference
at android.view.ViewGroup.dispatchDraw(ViewGroup.java:3357)
at android.view.View.updateDisplayListIfDirty(View.java:14288)
at android.view.View.getDisplayList(View.java:14315)
at android.view.ViewGroup.recreateChildDisplayList(ViewGroup.java:3549)
at android.view.ViewGroup.dispatchGetDisplayList(ViewGroup.java:3528)
at android.view.View.updateDisplayListIfDirty(View.java:14253)
at android.view.View.getDisplayList(View.java:14315)
at android.view.ViewGroup.recreateChildDisplayList(ViewGroup.java:3549)
at android.view.ViewGroup.dispatchGetDisplayList(ViewGroup.java:3528)
at android.view.View.updateDisplayListIfDirty(View.java:14253)
at android.view.View.getDisplayList(View.java:14315)
at android.view.ViewGroup.recreateChildDisplayList(ViewGroup.java:3549)
at android.view.ViewGroup.dispatchGetDisplayList(ViewGroup.java:3528)
at android.view.View.updateDisplayListIfDirty(View.java:14253)
at android.view.View.getDisplayList(View.java:14315)
at android.view.ViewGroup.recreateChildDisplayList(ViewGroup.java:3549)
at android.view.ViewGroup.dispatchGetDisplayList(ViewGroup.java:3528)
at android.view.View.updateDisplayListIfDirty(View.java:14253)
at android.view.View.getDisplayList(View.java:14315)
at android.view.ViewGroup.recreateChildDisplayList(ViewGroup.java:3549)
at android.view.ViewGroup.dispatchGetDisplayList(ViewGroup.java:3528)
at android.view.View.updateDisplayListIfDirty(View.java:14253)
at android.view.View.getDisplayList(View.java:14315)
at android.view.ViewGroup.recreateChildDisplayList(ViewGroup.java:3549)
at android.view.ViewGroup.dispatchGetDisplayList(ViewGroup.java:3528)
at android.view.View.updateDisplayListIfDirty(View.java:14253)
at android.view.View.getDisplayList(View.java:14315)
at android.view.ViewGroup.recreateChildDisplayList(ViewGroup.java:3549)
at android.view.ViewGroup.dispatchGetDisplayList(ViewGroup.java:3528)
at android.view.View.updateDisplayListIfDirty(View.java:14253)
at android.view.View.getDisplayList(View.java:14315)
at android.view.ViewGroup.recreateChildDisplayList(ViewGroup.java:3549)
at android.view.ViewGroup.dispatchGetDisplayList(ViewGroup.java:3528)
at android.view.View.updateDisplayListIfDirty(View.java:14253)
at android.view.View.getDisplayList(View.java:14315)
at android.view.ViewGroup.recreateChildDisplayList(ViewGroup.java:3549)
at android.view.ViewGroup.dispatchGetDisplayList(ViewGroup.java:3528)
at android.view.View.updateDisplayListIfDirty(View.java:14253)
at android.view.View.getDisplayList(View.java:14315)
at android.view.ThreadedRenderer.updateViewTreeDisplayList(ThreadedRenderer.java:273)
at android.view.ThreadedRenderer.updateRootDisplayList(ThreadedRenderer.java:279)
at android.view.ThreadedRenderer.draw(ThreadedRenderer.java:318)
at android.view.ViewRootImpl.draw(ViewRootImpl.java:2561)
at android.view.ViewRootImpl.performDraw(ViewRootImpl.java:2377)
at android.view.ViewRootImpl.performTraversals(ViewRootImpl.java:2007)
at android.view.ViewRootImpl.doTraversal(ViewRootImpl.java:1086)
at android.view.ViewRootImpl$TraversalRunnable.run(ViewRootImpl.java:6453)
at android.view.Choreographer$CallbackRecord.run(Choreographer.java:846)
at android.view.Choreographer.doCallbacks(Choreographer.java:647)
at android.view.Choreographer.doFrame(Choreographer.java:601)
at android.view.Choreographer$FrameDisplayEventReceiver.run(Choreographer.java:829)
at android.os.Handler.handleCallback(Handler.java:739)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage(Handler.java:95)
at android.os.Looper.loop(Looper.java:135)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main(ActivityThread.java:5254)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:372)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run(ZygoteInit.java:927)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main(ZygoteInit.java:713)
Does anyone know whether there is related bug logged against Android code?
Java Solutions
Solution 1 - Java
Possible Solution
I had this same issue. I setup an animation
and in onAnimationEnd
I was removing the object that had been animated which is when problems started. What I did was setup an asynchronous Runnable
to wait 100 milliseconds after the animation had stopped before removing the animated object:
the object previously animated is this._loader
private void removeLoader() {
final ContentContainer self = this; // "CustomContainer" needs to match the type of `this`
Handler h = new Handler();
h.postAtTime(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
MainActivity.instance.runOnUiThread(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
try {
if(self._loader == null) {
// there is no loader. quit now while you still have the chance!!
return;
}
while(self._loader.getParent() != null) {
removeView(self._loader);
}
} catch(Exception e) {
Crashlytics.logException(e);
e.printStackTrace();
}
self._loader = null;
}
});
}
}, 100);
}
Cheers
Solution 2 - Java
I was facing same problem. I resolved with Handler.
new Handler(Looper.getMainLooper()).post(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
// remove fragment from here
}
});
Solution 3 - Java
The problem is in the ViewGroup
's dispatchDraw()
method. This method tries to draw all the ViewGroup
's children. When a child is null
, you get an exception, which most likely comes from this line: if ((child.mViewFlags & VISIBILITY_MASK) == VISIBLE) {
(notice the mViewFlags
).
So the problem is that one of your views, somewhere, is not properly initialized. I'm afraid that's the best I can do.
Solution 4 - Java
We started getting this error unexpectedly too. It was tracked down to fragment animations being the issue. More specifically using custom animations with replace()
in a fragment transaction when the app is built against Local Maven repository for Support Libraries
rev > 26.
Possible solution
Downgrade Local Maven repository for Support Libraries
to rev 26. See here
Solution 5 - Java
Possible cause: I was having the exact same issue. It turned out it started to happen when I added code to modify the view tree within onDraw() call. To be specific, I removed a view with children in my derived onDraw() when certain conditions were met. I now believe this is a bad thing to do, probably because the platform is trying to draw views that I have now removed from the view tree. I resolved the issue by posting the deletion with Runnable to happen after the call to onDraw() has finished.
Solution 6 - Java
Override dispatchDraw method and put in it a try/catch block, like this:
public void dispatchDraw(Canvas c)
{
try
{
super.dispatchDraw(c);
return;
}
catch(Exception exception)
{
return;
}
}
Solution 7 - Java
While it is ugly and not good practice, the only thing I could get to reliably work is just catching the exception in dispatchDraw()
like below:
override fun dispatchDraw(canvas: Canvas?) {
/*
* We're doing this because of the below exception that is out of our control:
* java.lang.NullPointerException: Attempt to read from field
* 'int android.view.View.mViewFlags' on a null object reference at
* android.view.ViewGroup.dispatchDraw(ViewGroup.java:4111)
*/
try {
super.dispatchDraw(canvas)
} catch (e: NullPointerException) {
}
}
Just make sure your desired behavior is working correctly and you're not breaking something else by doing this. Again, not ideal, but it's the only thing I could get to work and I'm absolutely sure in my case it's not breaking anything else.
Peace to you :)
Solution 8 - Java
I was trying to navigate from Fragment A to Fragment B, and Fragment A was a form that required data from Fragment B.
So when I tried to navigate without filling up A, it was throwing this exception.
Also, even if A was independent of the data B, it was throwing this exception.
I have no idea why but I added a condition where the user had to fill-up the form before navigating away and that solved the issue.
Solution 9 - Java
It's a threading issue. Could be that you're refreshing your ViewPager
or some other adapter.
Have been facing this issue on and off, and realised that if you place it in the UI Thread in your Activity
, then it'll render just fine.
activity?.runOnUiThread{
// Add Your UI Updating Methods Here
}
Solution 10 - Java
No delay / threading stuff required. Plz Read through... The post is old but for the future readers, it would be helpful. I explain in details what really happens with a use-case I faced and solved.
I have a viewflipper which animates flipping next and previous through its children using simple slide-in / slide-out animations. I need to remove a view from viewflipper just after flipping is completed and to make sure it happens at the right time, slide-in animations have a listener where I remove the view in there. Everything worked perfect for flip-to-next while flip-to-previous threw the above mentioned exception. After some trial and error turns out:
when flipping to next the following is the sequence:
1-slide-out starts
2-slide-in starts
3-slide-out finishes
4-slide-in finishes
So having listener on slide-in is the right thing since both animations are guaranteed to be completed there.
But when flipping to previous the following is the sequence:
1-slide-in starts
2-slide-out starts
3-slide-in finishes
4-slide-out finishes
As you can see, when slide-in finishes, slide-out is not done yet and hence there happens the exception. I simply set the listener on slide-out and it worked perfectly.
While all of the other answers urge to remove the view with a delay (which of course helps to make sure concurrent animations are all done) but as you could see that is not the case.
As a general rule, when you have a set of animations running on a view (even with the exact same durations) -although the general belief is that they would finish both together - but they won't (remember that threads are virtually concurrent).