Note: git push --all won&#39;t push your tags, only your branches.

    git push --all
    git push --tags

would really push *everything*. See also &quot;[Set up git to pull and push all branches][1]&quot;.  
Don&#39;t forget the **`--dry-run`** option to make some test before actually pushing everything.  
See also GitHub help &quot;[Working with remotes][2]&quot; to set your origin to your GitHub remote repo.

----

As mentioned in &quot;[How to make “git push” include tags within a branch?][3]&quot;, git 1.8.3+ (May 2013) introduced:

    git push --follow-tags

&gt; This won&#39;t push all the tags, but only the ones accessible from the branch(es) HEAD(s) you are pushing.

That can help keeping that operation (pushing commits *and* tags) done with *one* command instead of two.

Git 2.4.1+ (Q2 2015) will introduce the option `push.followTags`.

  [1]: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1914579/set-up-git-to-pull-and-push-all-branches
  [2]: http://help.github.com/remotes/
  [3]: https://stackoverflow.com/a/17219399/6309
  

The accepted answer isn&#39;t quite right, or at least it didn&#39;t work for me.  I needed to specify the remote repo as well, eg:

    git push origin --all

This might be easy question but I am having a hard time finding the answer. How does Redis 2.0 handle running out of maximum allocated memory? How does it decide which data to remove or which data to keep in memory?

What does Redis do when it runs out of memory?

I&#39;m looking for the best way to do search-and-replace (with confirmation) across all project files in Vim. By &quot;project files&quot; I mean files in the current directory, some of which do not have to be open.

One way to do this could be to simply open all of the files in the current directory:

    :args ./**

and then do the search and replace on all open files:

    :argdo %s/Search/Replace/gce

However, when I do this, Vim&#39;s memory usage jumps from a couple dozen of MB to over 2 GB, which doesn&#39;t work for me.

I also have the [EasyGrep][1] plugin installed, but it almost never works&amp;mdash;either it doesn&#39;t find all the occurrences, or it just hangs until I press &lt;kbd&gt;Ctrl&lt;/kbd&gt;&lt;kbd&gt;C&lt;/kbd&gt;. So far my preferred way to accomplish this task it to [ack-grep][2] for the search term, using it&#39;s quickfix window open any file that contains the term and was not opened before, and finally `:bufdo %s/Search/Replace/gce`.

I&#39;m looking either for a good, working plugin that can be used for this, or alternatively a command/sequence of commands that would be easier than the one I&#39;m using now.

  [1]: http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=2438
  [2]: http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=2572

Search and replace in Vim across all the project files

I created a new GitHub repo - I want to put my existing repo there.  
I followed the instructions:

    cd existing_git_repo
    git remote add origin git@github.com:acme-org/myprj.git
    git push origin master

This only pushes the master branch to GitHub.  
How do I push everything (including all branches) in my existing repo to my new GitHub repo? 

    

With GitHub how do I push all branches when adding an existing repo?

I created a new GitHub repo - I want to put my existing repo there. 
I followed the instructions:
<pre><code class="hljs language-bash">cd existing_git_repo
git remote add origin git@github.com:acme-org/myprj.git
git push origin master
</code></pre>
This only pushes the master branch to GitHub. 
How do I push everything (including all branches) in my existing repo to my new GitHub repo?

Attempting something like `git clone git://github.com/ry/node.git` will not work, it results in:

    Initialized empty Git repository in /home/robert/node/.git/
    github.com[0: 207.97.227.239]: errno=Connection timed out
    fatal: unable to connect a socket (Connection timed out)

However, cloning over HTTP works fine. So far I&#39;ve gathered that it&#39;s a problem with the protocol, but I&#39;m trying to install cloud9 which is requiring the command 

`git submodule update --init --recursive`

which is trying to use the git:// protocol and failing. Is there a way to change how that command will work or something?

git:// protocol blocked by company, how can I get around that?

What is the right way to undo a rename in git, like:

    git mv file1 file2

Undo git mv (rename)

Several times, I have come across the statement that, if you move a single function from one file to another file, Git can track it. For example, [this entry][1] says, &quot;Linus says that if you move a function from one file to another, Git will tell you the history of that single function across the move.&quot;

But I have a little bit of awareness of some of Git&#39;s under-the-hood design, and I don&#39;t see how this is possible. So I&#39;m wondering ... is this is a correct statement? And if so, how is this possible?

My understanding is that Git stores each file&#39;s contents as a Blob, and each Blob has a globally unique identity which arises from the SHA hash of its contents and size. Git then represents folders as Trees. Any filename information belongs to the Tree, not to the Blob, so a file rename for example shows up as a change to a Tree, not to a Blob.

So if I have a file called &quot;foo&quot; with 20 functions in it, and a file called &quot;bar&quot; with 5 functions in it, and I move one of the functions from foo into bar (resulting in 19 and 6, respectively), how can Git detect that I moved that function from one file to another?

From my understanding, this would cause 2 new blobs to exist (one for the modified foo and one for the modified bar). I realize a diff could be calculated to show that the function was moved from one file to the other. But I don&#39;t see how history about the function could possibly become associated with bar instead of foo (not automatically, anyway).

If Git were to actually look *inside* of single files, and compute a *blob per function* (which would be crazy / infeasible, because you&#39;d have to know how to parse any possible language), then I could see how this might be possible.

So ... is the statement correct or not? And if it is correct, then what is lacking in my understanding?


  [1]: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1598759/git-and-mercurial-compare-and-contrast/1598812#1598812/

Can Git really track the movement of a single function from 1 file to another? If so, how?

I&#39;m trying to take a branch with changes and bring it back to be identical to the upstream it diverged from. The changes are both local and have been pushed to github, so neither `git reset` or `git rebase` are really viable, since they change history, which is a bad thing with a branch that&#39;s already been pushed.

I&#39;ve also tried `git merge` with various strategies but none of them undo the local changes, i.e. if I&#39;d added a file, a merge might bring other files back in line, but I&#39;ll still have that file that the upstream doesn&#39;t have.

I could just create a new branch off the upstream, but i&#39;d really like a merge that in terms of revision history applies all the changes to take my branch and make it identical to the upstream again, so that I can safely push that change without clobbering history. Is there such a command or series of commands?

git command for making one branch like another

Suppose I have my &quot;master&quot; branch checked out. I&#39;ve committed some production changes to &quot;master&quot;, and now I want to rebase my &quot;experimental&quot; branch onto the latest master. But, I want to do this without modifying any files in my working copy. Essentially, I want all the magic to happen inside the .git directory, without touching the working copy.

If not for the &quot;don&#39;t modify my working copy&quot; requirement, this would just be a matter of doing:

    # current branch is master
    git checkout experimental
    git rebase master
    git checkout master

My real problem is that this modifies timestamps in my working copy, even though I&#39;m ending by checking out the exact same content I started with. As soon as I run &quot;git checkout experimental&quot;, any files that contain changes in the experimental branch will get their mtime set to the current time -- and so will any files that were changed in master since the last time I rebased experimental. Because the mtimes have changed, things like build tools get the idea that there&#39;s work they need to do again, even though, by the time I&#39;m done, the files&#39; contents haven&#39;t actually changed. (In my case, it&#39;s that if a project file&#39;s timestamp changes, Visual Studio thinks it needs to spend a lot of time unloading and reloading the project.) I want to avoid that.

**Is there a way to do all of the above in one step, without ever modifying anything in the working copy** *(assuming there are no conflicts during the rebase)***?**

(If there *are* conflicts, my preference would be to show the error and then abort the entire operation, without ever modifying any timestamps. But that&#39;s just my preference, not a hard requirement -- I don&#39;t know what all is possible.)

Of course I can write a script to capture the mtimes, run git, and then reset the mtimes; but it seems likely that Git would already have a way to do things like rebase without bothering the working copy, since the rebase is really about the deltas, not the files&#39; actual contents.

Can I rebase a Git branch without modifying my working copy?

I know there are plenty of ways to run git on my server, but I quite like the functionality of git with repo browsing - the fact that i can look at previous versions in the web interface.

Now was I able to, I&#39;d use github, but the problem is our source control rules are very strict and we aren&#39;t allowed to put files on other servers, even if they are encrypted.

Is there a script that allows us to run a github like interface, or rather one that allows me to browse the revision history of the git project through a web interface?

I&#39;m running a LAMP server, but would consider alternate languages like python, perl etc should nothing in php be available.

interested in both paid and open source softwares 


Is there a Github clone in PHP that I can run on my own server?

I&#39;m new to web development and GitHub. When I commit any changes, these changes are reflected on my GitHub repo under &quot;unknown (author)&quot;. How do I change this to reflect my name/email address?

Thanks.

How do I change my author name on GitHub?

If I fork a project that&#39;s hosted on github. Do I fork all the branches? How do I know which branch my fork is based on? In other words which branch will be downloaded to my PC?



Content Type	Original Author	Original Content on Stackoverflow
Question	kipper	View Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - Git	VonC	View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - Git	Iain Hunter	View Answer on Stackoverflow

With GitHub how do I push all branches when adding an existing repo?

Git Problem Overview

Git Solutions

Solution 1 - Git

Solution 2 - Git

Search and replace in Vim across all the project files

What does Redis do when it runs out of memory?

Attributions