Why is "origin/HEAD" shown when running "git branch -r"?

GitVersion ControlGithub

Git Problem Overview


When you run git branch -r why the blazes does it list origin/HEAD? For example, there's a remote repo on GitHub, say, with two branches: master and awesome-feature. If I do git clone to grab it and then go into my new directory and list the branches, I see this:

$ git branch -r
origin/HEAD
origin/master
origin/awesome-feature

Or whatever order it would be in (alpha? I'm faking this example to keep the identity of an innocent repo secret). So what's the HEAD business? Is it what the last person to push had their HEAD pointed at when they pushed? Won't that always be whatever it was they pushed? HEADs move around... why do I care what someone's HEAD pointed at on another machine?

I'm just getting a handle on remote tracking and such, so this is one lingering confusion. Thanks!

EDIT: I was under the impression that dedicated remote repos (like GitHub where no one will ssh in and work on that code, but only pull or push, etc) didn't and shouldn't have a HEAD because there was, basically, no working copy. Not so?

Git Solutions


Solution 1 - Git

@robinst is correct.

In git, you can select which branch is checked out by default (i.e. when you clone). By default, origin/HEAD will point at that.

On GitHub, You can change this in the Admin settings for your GitHub repo. You can also do it from the command-line via

git remote set-head origin trunk

or delete it altogether via

git remote set-head origin -d

Example. Look at the 'Switch Branches' drop-down. trunk is checked, so origin/HEAD follows trunk.

Solution 2 - Git

The reason a bare repository can have a HEAD, is that because it determines which branch is initially checked out after a clone of the repository.

Normally, HEAD points to master, and that is the branch that is checked out when people clone the repository. Setting it to another branch (by editing HEAD in the bare repository) results in that branch being checked out on clone.

Solution 3 - Git

> I was under the impression that > dedicated remote repos (like GitHub > where no one will ssh in and work on > that code, but only pull or push, etc) > didn't and shouldn't have a HEAD > because there was, basically, no > working copy. Not so?

I had the exact same impression like you said.

And I even can not delete that origin/HEAD remote-tracking branch cloned from github by doing

git branch -d -r origin/HEAD

This had no effect.

Can some one tell me how I can delete that origin/HEAD remote-tracking branch?

update

Though I did not found why there is a origin/HEAD created when clone from github, I find a way to delete it.

The new version of git provide

git remote set-head <name> -d

to delete the useless HEAD pointer of remote-tracking branch.

And we can also change the dumb default name 'origin' to whatever we want by using

git remote rename origin <new_name>

Hope this can help. :)

Solution 4 - Git

You're right that pushing to dedicated remote repos work much better when they are 'bare', that is, when they don't have working directories. Git's architecture is designed for updating by patches or pull (fetch), which makes sense in a distributed VCS. As the docs say somewhere, pushing to a branch which is currently checked out can result in "unexpected results".

The HEAD is part of the requirements for a valid repository. Git Repository Layout says, in part:

HEAD

A symref (see glossary) to the refs/heads/ namespace describing the currently active  
branch. It does not mean much if the repository is not associated with any working tree  
(i.e. a bare repository), but a valid git repository must have the HEAD file; some  
porcelains may use it to guess the designated "default" branch of the repository  
(usually master). It is legal if the named branch name does not (yet) exist.

So you're going to see HEAD as part of the branch list, even if "it does not mean much..."

Solution 5 - Git

If "origin" is a remote repository, then origin/HEAD identifies the default branch on that remote repository.

Example:

$ git remote show
origin
$ git remote show origin
* remote origin
  Fetch URL: git@github.com:walkerh/pipe-o-matic.git
  Push  URL: git@github.com:walkerh/pipe-o-matic.git
  HEAD branch: master
  Remote branch:
    master tracked
  Local branch configured for 'git pull':
    master merges with remote master
  Local ref configured for 'git push':
    master pushes to master (fast-forwardable)

Note the line that says "HEAD branch: master". This is where the remote repository lets clients know which branch to checkout by default.

Solution 6 - Git

There's always a HEAD that points to the currently checked out branch on the remote repo (which may or may not be master). Even remote repositories have current branches. Usually it is master, and off the top of my head I can't think of any reason why one would want to change it, but it can be changed.

Solution 7 - Git

My guess is that someone pushed a branch and called it HEAD:

git push origin HEAD

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionBen HamillView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - Gitcdunn2001View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - GitrobinstView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - GitbobluView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - GitPaulView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - GitWalker Hale IVView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - GitcodelogicView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - GitDustinView Answer on Stackoverflow