Where to place AutoMapper.CreateMaps?

asp.net MvcDesign PatternsConfigurationAutomapper

asp.net Mvc Problem Overview


I'm using AutoMapper in an ASP.NET MVC application. I was told that I should move the AutoMapper.CreateMap elsewhere as they have a lot of overhead. I'm not too sure how to design my application to put these calls in just 1 place.

I have a web layer, service layer and a data layer. Each a project of its own. I use Ninject to DI everything. I'll utilize AutoMapper in both web and service layers.

So what are your setup for AutoMapper's CreateMap? Where do you put it? How do you call it?

asp.net Mvc Solutions


Solution 1 - asp.net Mvc

Doesn't matter, as long as it's a static class. It's all about convention.

Our convention is that each "layer" (web, services, data) has a single file called AutoMapperXConfiguration.cs, with a single method called Configure(), where X is the layer.

The Configure() method then calls private methods for each area.

Here's an example of our web tier config:

public static class AutoMapperWebConfiguration
{
   public static void Configure()
   {
      ConfigureUserMapping();
      ConfigurePostMapping();
   }

   private static void ConfigureUserMapping()
   {
      Mapper.CreateMap<User,UserViewModel>();
   } 

   // ... etc
}

We create a method for each "aggregate" (User, Post), so things are separated nicely.

Then your Global.asax:

AutoMapperWebConfiguration.Configure();
AutoMapperServicesConfiguration.Configure();
AutoMapperDomainConfiguration.Configure();
// etc

It's kind of like an "interface of words" - can't enforce it, but you expect it, so you can code (and refactor) if necessary.

EDIT:

Just thought I'd mention that I now use AutoMapper profiles, so the above example becomes:

public static class AutoMapperWebConfiguration
{
   public static void Configure()
   {
	  Mapper.Initialize(cfg =>
	  {
	    cfg.AddProfile(new UserProfile());
		cfg.AddProfile(new PostProfile());
	  });
   }
}

public class UserProfile : Profile
{
	protected override void Configure()
	{
		 Mapper.CreateMap<User,UserViewModel>();
	}
}

Much cleaner/more robust.

Solution 2 - asp.net Mvc

You can really put it anywhere as long as your web project references the assembly that it is in. In your situation I would put it in the service layer as that will be accessible by the web layer and the service layer and later if you decide to do a console app or you are doing a unit test project the mapping configuration will be available from those projects as well.

In your Global.asax you will then call the method that sets all of your maps. See below:

File AutoMapperBootStrapper.cs

public static class AutoMapperBootStrapper
{
     public static void BootStrap()
     {  
         AutoMapper.CreateMap<Object1, Object2>();
         // So on...


     }
}

Global.asax on application start

just call

AutoMapperBootStrapper.BootStrap();

Now some people will argue against this method violates some SOLID principles, which they have valid arguments. Here they are for the reading.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1807298/configuring-automapper-in-bootstrapper-violates-open-closed-principle

Solution 3 - asp.net Mvc

Update: The approach posted here is no more valid as SelfProfiler has been removed as of AutoMapper v2.

I would take a similar approach as Thoai. But I would use the built-in SelfProfiler<> class to handle the maps, then use the Mapper.SelfConfigure function to initialize.

Using this object as the source:

public class User
{
    public int Id { get; set; }
    public string FirstName { get; set; }
    public string LastName { get; set; }
    public DateTime BirthDate { get; set; }
    public string GetFullName()
    {
        return string.Format("{0} {1}", FirstName, LastName);
    }
}

And these as the destination:

public class UserViewModel
{
    public int Id { get; set; }
    public string FirstName { get; set; }
    public string LastName { get; set; }
}

public class UserWithAgeViewModel
{
    public int Id { get; set; }
    public string FullName { get; set; }
    public int Age { get; set; }
}

You can create these profiles:

public class UserViewModelProfile : SelfProfiler<User,UserViewModel>
{
    protected override void DescribeConfiguration(IMappingExpression<User, UserViewModel> map)
    {
    //This maps by convention, so no configuration needed
    }
}

public class UserWithAgeViewModelProfile : SelfProfiler<User, UserWithAgeViewModel>
{
    protected override void DescribeConfiguration(IMappingExpression<User, UserWithAgeViewModel> map)
    {
    //This map needs a little configuration
        map.ForMember(d => d.Age, o => o.MapFrom(s => DateTime.Now.Year - s.BirthDate.Year));
    }
}

To initialize in your application, create this class

 public class AutoMapperConfiguration
 {
      public static void Initialize()
      {
          Mapper.Initialize(x=>
          {
              x.SelfConfigure(typeof (UserViewModel).Assembly);
              // add assemblies as necessary
          });
      }
 }

Add this line to your global.asax.cs file: AutoMapperConfiguration.Initialize()

Now you can place your mapping classes where they make sense to you and not worry about one monolithic mapping class.

Solution 4 - asp.net Mvc

For those of you who adhere to the following:

  1. using an ioc container
  2. don't like to break open closed for this
  3. don't like a monolithic config file

I did a combo between profiles and leveraging my ioc container:

IoC configuration:

public class Automapper : IWindsorInstaller
{
    public void Install(IWindsorContainer container, IConfigurationStore store)
    {
        container.Register(Classes.FromThisAssembly().BasedOn<Profile>().WithServiceBase());

        container.Register(Component.For<IMappingEngine>().UsingFactoryMethod(k =>
        {
            Profile[] profiles = k.ResolveAll<Profile>();

            Mapper.Initialize(cfg =>
            {
                foreach (var profile in profiles)
                {
                    cfg.AddProfile(profile);
                }
            });

            profiles.ForEach(k.ReleaseComponent);

            return Mapper.Engine;
        }));
    }
}

Configuration example:

public class TagStatusViewModelMappings : Profile
{
    protected override void Configure()
    {
        Mapper.CreateMap<Service.Contracts.TagStatusViewModel, TagStatusViewModel>();
    }
}

Usage example:

public class TagStatusController : ApiController
{
    private readonly IFooService _service;
    private readonly IMappingEngine _mapper;

    public TagStatusController(IFooService service, IMappingEngine mapper)
    {
        _service = service;
        _mapper = mapper;
    }

    [Route("")]
    public HttpResponseMessage Get()
    {
        var response = _service.GetTagStatus();

        return Request.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.Accepted, _mapper.Map<List<ViewModels.TagStatusViewModel>>(response)); 
    }
}

The trade-off is that you have to reference the Mapper by the IMappingEngine interface instead of the static Mapper, but that's a convention I can live with.

Solution 5 - asp.net Mvc

All of above solutions provide a static method to call (from app_start or any where) that it should call other methods to configure parts of mapping-configuration. But, if you have a modular application, that modules may plug in and out of application at any time, these solutions does not work. I suggest using WebActivator library that can register some methods to run on app_pre_start and app_post_start any where:

// in MyModule1.dll
public class InitMapInModule1 {
    static void Init() {
        Mapper.CreateMap<User, UserViewModel>();
        // other stuffs
    }
}
[assembly: PreApplicationStartMethod(typeof(InitMapInModule1), "Init")]

// in MyModule2.dll
public class InitMapInModule2 {
    static void Init() {
        Mapper.CreateMap<Blog, BlogViewModel>();
        // other stuffs
    }
}
[assembly: PreApplicationStartMethod(typeof(InitMapInModule2), "Init")]

// in MyModule3.dll
public class InitMapInModule3 {
    static void Init() {
        Mapper.CreateMap<Comment, CommentViewModel>();
        // other stuffs
    }
}
[assembly: PreApplicationStartMethod(typeof(InitMapInModule2), "Init")]

// and in other libraries...

You can install WebActivator via NuGet.

Solution 6 - asp.net Mvc

In addition to the best answer, a good way is using Autofac IoC liberary to add some automation. With this you just define your profiles regardless of initiations.

   public static class MapperConfig
    {
        internal static void Configure()
        {

            var myAssembly = Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly();

            var builder = new ContainerBuilder();

            builder.RegisterAssemblyTypes(myAssembly)
                .Where(t => t.IsSubclassOf(typeof(Profile))).As<Profile>();

            var container = builder.Build();

            using (var scope = container.BeginLifetimeScope())
            {
                var profiles = container.Resolve<IEnumerable<Profile>>();

                foreach (var profile in profiles)
                {
                    Mapper.Initialize(cfg =>
                    {
                        cfg.AddProfile(profile);
                    });                    
                }

            }

        }
    }

and calling this line in Application_Start method:

MapperConfig.Configure();

The above code finds all Profile sub classes and initiate them automatically.

Solution 7 - asp.net Mvc

Putting all the mapping logic in 1 location is not a good practice for me. Because the mapping class will be extremely large and very hard to maintain.

I recommend put the mapping stuff together with the ViewModel class in the same cs file. You can easily navigate to the mapping definition you want following this convention. Moreover, while creating the mapping class, you can reference to the ViewModel properties faster since they are in the same file.

So your view model class will look like:

public class UserViewModel
{
    public ObjectId Id { get; set; }

    public string Firstname { get; set; }

    public string Lastname { get; set; }

    public string Email { get; set; }

    public string Password { get; set; }
}

public class UserViewModelMapping : IBootStrapper // Whatever
{
    public void Start()
    {
        Mapper.CreateMap<User, UserViewModel>();
    }
}

Solution 8 - asp.net Mvc

From new version of AutoMapper using static method Mapper.Map() is deprecated. So you can add MapperConfiguration as static property to MvcApplication (Global.asax.cs) and use it to create instance of Mapper.

App_Start

public class MapperConfig
{
    public static MapperConfiguration MapperConfiguration()
    {
        return new MapperConfiguration(_ =>
        {
            _.AddProfile(new FileProfile());
            _.AddProfile(new ChartProfile());
        });
    }
}

Global.asax.cs

public class MvcApplication : System.Web.HttpApplication
{
    internal static MapperConfiguration MapperConfiguration { get; private set; }

    protected void Application_Start()
    {
        MapperConfiguration = MapperConfig.MapperConfiguration();
        ...
    }
}

BaseController.cs

    public class BaseController : Controller
    {
        //
        // GET: /Base/
        private IMapper _mapper = null;
        protected IMapper Mapper
        {
            get
            {
                if (_mapper == null) _mapper = MvcApplication.MapperConfiguration.CreateMapper();
                return _mapper;
            }
        }
    }

https://github.com/AutoMapper/AutoMapper/wiki/Migrating-from-static-API

Solution 9 - asp.net Mvc

For vb.net programmers using the new Version (5.x) of AutoMapper.

Global.asax.vb:

Public Class MvcApplication
    Inherits System.Web.HttpApplication

    Protected Sub Application_Start()
        AutoMapperConfiguration.Configure()
    End Sub
End Class

AutoMapperConfiguration:

Imports AutoMapper

Module AutoMapperConfiguration
    Public MapperConfiguration As IMapper
    Public Sub Configure()
        Dim config = New MapperConfiguration(
            Sub(cfg)
                cfg.AddProfile(New UserProfile())
                cfg.AddProfile(New PostProfile())
            End Sub)
        MapperConfiguration = config.CreateMapper()
    End Sub
End Module

Profiles:

Public Class UserProfile
    Inherits AutoMapper.Profile
    Protected Overrides Sub Configure()
        Me.CreateMap(Of User, UserViewModel)()
    End Sub
End Class

Mapping:

Dim ViewUser = MapperConfiguration.Map(Of UserViewModel)(User)

Solution 10 - asp.net Mvc

For those who are (lost) using:

  • WebAPI 2
  • SimpleInjector 3.1
  • AutoMapper 4.2.1 (With Profiles)

Here's how I managed integrating AutoMapper in the "new way". Also, a Huge thanks to this answer(and question)

1 - Created a folder in the WebAPI project called "ProfileMappers". In this folder I place all my profiles classes which creates my mappings:

public class EntityToViewModelProfile : Profile
{
    protected override void Configure()
    {
        CreateMap<User, UserViewModel>();
    }

    public override string ProfileName
    {
        get
        {
            return this.GetType().Name;
        }
    }
}

2 - In my App_Start, I have a SimpleInjectorApiInitializer which configures my SimpleInjector container:

public static Container Initialize(HttpConfiguration httpConfig)
{
    var container = new Container();

    container.Options.DefaultScopedLifestyle = new WebApiRequestLifestyle();

    //Register Installers
    Register(container);

    container.RegisterWebApiControllers(GlobalConfiguration.Configuration);

    //Verify container
    container.Verify();

    //Set SimpleInjector as the Dependency Resolver for the API
    GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.DependencyResolver =
       new SimpleInjectorWebApiDependencyResolver(container);

    httpConfig.DependencyResolver = new SimpleInjectorWebApiDependencyResolver(container);

    return container;
}

private static void Register(Container container)
{
     container.Register<ISingleton, Singleton>(Lifestyle.Singleton);

    //Get all my Profiles from the assembly (in my case was the webapi)
    var profiles =  from t in typeof(SimpleInjectorApiInitializer).Assembly.GetTypes()
                    where typeof(Profile).IsAssignableFrom(t)
                    select (Profile)Activator.CreateInstance(t);

	//add all profiles found to the MapperConfiguration
    var config = new MapperConfiguration(cfg =>
    {
        foreach (var profile in profiles)
        {
            cfg.AddProfile(profile);
        }
    });

    //Register IMapper instance in the container.
    container.Register<IMapper>(() => config.CreateMapper(container.GetInstance));

	//If you need the config for LinqProjections, inject also the config
	//container.RegisterSingleton<MapperConfiguration>(config);
}

3 - Startup.cs

//Just call the Initialize method on the SimpleInjector class above
var container = SimpleInjectorApiInitializer.Initialize(configuration);

4 - Then, in your controller just inject as usually a IMapper interface:

private readonly IMapper mapper;

public AccountController( IMapper mapper)
{
    this.mapper = mapper;
}

//Using..
var userEntity = mapper.Map<UserViewModel, User>(entity);

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionShawn McleanView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - asp.net MvcRPM1984View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - asp.net MvcBrett AllredView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - asp.net MvccodeprogressionView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - asp.net MvcMariusView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - asp.net Mvcamiry jdView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - asp.net MvcMahmoud MoravejView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - asp.net MvcVan Thoai NguyenView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - asp.net MvcAndrey BurykinView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - asp.net MvcrolandView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 10 - asp.net MvcjpgrassiView Answer on Stackoverflow