When should I use GC.SuppressFinalize()?

C#.NetGarbage CollectionIdisposableSuppressfinalize

C# Problem Overview


In .NET, under which circumstances should I use GC.SuppressFinalize()?

What advantage(s) does using this method give me?

C# Solutions


Solution 1 - C#

SuppressFinalize should only be called by a class that has a finalizer. It's informing the Garbage Collector (GC) that this object was cleaned up fully.

The recommended IDisposable pattern when you have a finalizer is:

public class MyClass : IDisposable
{
    private bool disposed = false;

    protected virtual void Dispose(bool disposing)
    {
        if (!disposed)
        {
            if (disposing)
            {
                // called via myClass.Dispose(). 
                // OK to use any private object references
            }
            // Release unmanaged resources.
            // Set large fields to null.                
            disposed = true;
        }
    }

    public void Dispose() // Implement IDisposable
    {
        Dispose(true);
        GC.SuppressFinalize(this);
    }

    ~MyClass() // the finalizer
    {
        Dispose(false);
    }
}

Normally, the CLR keeps tabs on objects with a finalizer when they are created (making them more expensive to create). SuppressFinalize tells the GC that the object was cleaned up properly and doesn't need to go onto the finalizer queue. It looks like a C++ destructor, but doesn't act anything like one.

The SuppressFinalize optimization is not trivial, as your objects can live a long time waiting on the finalizer queue. Don't be tempted to call SuppressFinalize on other objects mind you. That's a serious defect waiting to happen.

Design guidelines inform us that a finalizer isn't necessary if your object implements IDisposable, but if you have a finalizer you should implement IDisposable to allow deterministic cleanup of your class.

Most of the time you should be able to get away with IDisposable to clean up resources. You should only need a finalizer when your object holds onto unmanaged resources and you need to guarantee those resources are cleaned up.

Note: Sometimes coders will add a finalizer to debug builds of their own IDisposable classes in order to test that code has disposed their IDisposable object properly.

public void Dispose() // Implement IDisposable
{
    Dispose(true);
#if DEBUG
    GC.SuppressFinalize(this);
#endif
}

#if DEBUG
~MyClass() // the finalizer
{
    Dispose(false);
}
#endif

Solution 2 - C#

SupressFinalize tells the system that whatever work would have been done in the finalizer has already been done, so the finalizer doesn't need to be called. From the .NET docs:

> Objects that implement the IDisposable > interface can call this method from > the IDisposable.Dispose method to > prevent the garbage collector from > calling Object.Finalize on an > object that does not require it.

In general, most any Dispose() method should be able to call GC.SupressFinalize(), because it should clean up everything that would be cleaned up in the finalizer.

SupressFinalize is just something that provides an optimization that allows the system to not bother queuing the object to the finalizer thread. A properly written Dispose()/finalizer should work properly with or without a call to GC.SupressFinalize().

Solution 3 - C#

Dispose(true);
GC.SuppressFinalize(this);

If object has finalizer, .net put a reference in finalization queue.

Since we have call Dispose(true), it clear object, so we don't need finalization queue to do this job.

So call GC.SuppressFinalize(this) remove reference in finalization queue.

Solution 4 - C#

If a class, or anything derived from it, might hold the last live reference to an object with a finalizer, then either GC.SuppressFinalize(this) or GC.KeepAlive(this) should be called on the object after any operation that might be adversely affected by that finalizer, thus ensuring that the finalizer won't run until after that operation is complete.

The cost of GC.KeepAlive() and GC.SuppressFinalize(this) are essentially the same in any class that doesn't have a finalizer, and classes that do have finalizers should generally call GC.SuppressFinalize(this), so using the latter function as the last step of Dispose() may not always be necessary, but it won't be wrong.

Solution 5 - C#

That method must be called on the Dispose method of objects that implements the IDisposable, in this way the GC wouldn't call the finalizer another time if someones calls the Dispose method.

See: GC.SuppressFinalize(Object) Method - Microsoft Docs

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionSam SaffronView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - C#Robert PaulsonView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - C#Michael BurrView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - C#Max CHienView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - C#supercatView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - C#alberteinView Answer on Stackoverflow