What is the easiest way to remove the first character from a string?

RubyString

Ruby Problem Overview


Example:

[12,23,987,43

What is the fastest, most efficient way to remove the "[", using maybe a chop() but for the first character?

Ruby Solutions


Solution 1 - Ruby

Similar to Pablo's answer above, but a shade cleaner :

str[1..-1]

Will return the array from 1 to the last character.

'Hello World'[1..-1]
 => "ello World"

Solution 2 - Ruby

I kind of favor using something like:

asdf = "[12,23,987,43"
asdf[0] = ''

p asdf

>> "12,23,987,43"


I'm always looking for the fastest and most readable way of doing things:

require 'benchmark'

N = 1_000_000

puts RUBY_VERSION

STR = "[12,23,987,43"

Benchmark.bm(7) do |b|
  b.report('[0]') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43"[0] = '' } }
  b.report('sub') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43".sub(/^\[+/, "") } }

  b.report('gsub') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43".gsub(/^\[/, "") } }
  b.report('[1..-1]') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43"[1..-1] } }
  b.report('slice') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43".slice!(0) } }
  b.report('length') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43"[1..STR.length] } }

end

Running on my Mac Pro:

1.9.3
              user     system      total        real
[0]       0.840000   0.000000   0.840000 (  0.847496)
sub       1.960000   0.010000   1.970000 (  1.962767)
gsub      4.350000   0.020000   4.370000 (  4.372801)
[1..-1]   0.710000   0.000000   0.710000 (  0.713366)
slice     1.020000   0.000000   1.020000 (  1.020336)
length    1.160000   0.000000   1.160000 (  1.157882)

Updating to incorporate one more suggested answer:

require 'benchmark'

N = 1_000_000

class String
  def eat!(how_many = 1)
    self.replace self[how_many..-1]
  end

  def first(how_many = 1)
    self[0...how_many]
  end

  def shift(how_many = 1)
    shifted = first(how_many)
    self.replace self[how_many..-1]
    shifted
  end
  alias_method :shift!, :shift
end

class Array
  def eat!(how_many = 1)
    self.replace self[how_many..-1]
  end
end

puts RUBY_VERSION

STR = "[12,23,987,43"

Benchmark.bm(7) do |b|
  b.report('[0]') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43"[0] = '' } }
  b.report('sub') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43".sub(/^\[+/, "") } }

  b.report('gsub') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43".gsub(/^\[/, "") } }
  b.report('[1..-1]') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43"[1..-1] } }
  b.report('slice') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43".slice!(0) } }
  b.report('length') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43"[1..STR.length] } }
  b.report('eat!') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43".eat! } }
  b.report('reverse') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43".reverse.chop.reverse } }
end

Which results in:

2.1.2
              user     system      total        real
[0]       0.300000   0.000000   0.300000 (  0.295054)
sub       0.630000   0.000000   0.630000 (  0.631870)
gsub      2.090000   0.000000   2.090000 (  2.094368)
[1..-1]   0.230000   0.010000   0.240000 (  0.232846)
slice     0.320000   0.000000   0.320000 (  0.320714)
length    0.340000   0.000000   0.340000 (  0.341918)
eat!      0.460000   0.000000   0.460000 (  0.452724)
reverse   0.400000   0.000000   0.400000 (  0.399465)

And another using /^./ to find the first character:

require 'benchmark'

N = 1_000_000

class String
  def eat!(how_many = 1)
    self.replace self[how_many..-1]
  end

  def first(how_many = 1)
    self[0...how_many]
  end

  def shift(how_many = 1)
    shifted = first(how_many)
    self.replace self[how_many..-1]
    shifted
  end
  alias_method :shift!, :shift
end

class Array
  def eat!(how_many = 1)
    self.replace self[how_many..-1]
  end
end

puts RUBY_VERSION

STR = "[12,23,987,43"

Benchmark.bm(7) do |b|
  b.report('[0]') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43"[0] = '' } }
  b.report('[/^./]') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43"[/^./] = '' } }
  b.report('[/^\[/]') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43"[/^\[/] = '' } }
  b.report('sub+') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43".sub(/^\[+/, "") } }
  b.report('sub') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43".sub(/^\[/, "") } }
  b.report('gsub') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43".gsub(/^\[/, "") } }
  b.report('[1..-1]') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43"[1..-1] } }
  b.report('slice') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43".slice!(0) } }
  b.report('length') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43"[1..STR.length] } }
  b.report('eat!') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43".eat! } }
  b.report('reverse') { N.times { "[12,23,987,43".reverse.chop.reverse } }
end

Which results in:

# >> 2.1.5
# >>               user     system      total        real
# >> [0]       0.270000   0.000000   0.270000 (  0.270165)
# >> [/^./]    0.430000   0.000000   0.430000 (  0.432417)
# >> [/^\[/]   0.460000   0.000000   0.460000 (  0.458221)
# >> sub+      0.590000   0.000000   0.590000 (  0.590284)
# >> sub       0.590000   0.000000   0.590000 (  0.596366)
# >> gsub      1.880000   0.010000   1.890000 (  1.885892)
# >> [1..-1]   0.230000   0.000000   0.230000 (  0.223045)
# >> slice     0.300000   0.000000   0.300000 (  0.299175)
# >> length    0.320000   0.000000   0.320000 (  0.325841)
# >> eat!      0.410000   0.000000   0.410000 (  0.409306)
# >> reverse   0.390000   0.000000   0.390000 (  0.393044)

Here's another update on faster hardware and a newer version of Ruby:

2.3.1
              user     system      total        real
[0]       0.200000   0.000000   0.200000 (  0.204307)
[/^./]    0.390000   0.000000   0.390000 (  0.387527)
[/^\[/]   0.360000   0.000000   0.360000 (  0.360400)
sub+      0.490000   0.000000   0.490000 (  0.492083)
sub       0.480000   0.000000   0.480000 (  0.487862)
gsub      1.990000   0.000000   1.990000 (  1.988716)
[1..-1]   0.180000   0.000000   0.180000 (  0.181673)
slice     0.260000   0.000000   0.260000 (  0.266371)
length    0.270000   0.000000   0.270000 (  0.267651)
eat!      0.400000   0.010000   0.410000 (  0.398093)
reverse   0.340000   0.000000   0.340000 (  0.344077)

> Why is gsub so slow?

After doing a search/replace, gsub has to check for possible additional matches before it can tell if it's finished. sub only does one and finishes. Consider gsub like it's a minimum of two sub calls.

Also, it's important to remember that gsub, and sub can also be handicapped by poorly written regex which match much more slowly than a sub-string search. If possible anchor the regex to get the most speed from it. There are answers here on Stack Overflow demonstrating that so search around if you want more information.

Solution 3 - Ruby

We can use slice to do this:

val = "abc"
 => "abc" 
val.slice!(0)
 => "a" 
val
 => "bc" 

Using slice! we can delete any character by specifying its index.

Solution 4 - Ruby

Ruby 2.5+

As of Ruby 2.5 you can use delete_prefix or delete_prefix! to achieve this in a readable manner.

In this case "[12,23,987,43".delete_prefix("[").

More info here:

'invisible'.delete_prefix('in') #=> "visible"
'pink'.delete_prefix('in') #=> "pink"

N.B. you can also use this to remove items from the end of a string with delete_suffix and delete_suffix!

'worked'.delete_suffix('ed') #=> "work"
'medical'.delete_suffix('ed') #=> "medical"

Edit:

Using the Tin Man's benchmark setup, it looks pretty quick too (under the last two entries delete_p and delete_p!). Doesn't quite pip the previous faves for speed, though is very readable.

2.5.0
              user     system      total        real
[0]       0.174766   0.000489   0.175255 (  0.180207)
[/^./]    0.318038   0.000510   0.318548 (  0.323679)
[/^\[/]   0.372645   0.001134   0.373779 (  0.379029)
sub+      0.460295   0.001510   0.461805 (  0.467279)
sub       0.498351   0.001534   0.499885 (  0.505729)
gsub      1.669837   0.005141   1.674978 (  1.682853)
[1..-1]   0.199840   0.000976   0.200816 (  0.205889)
slice     0.279661   0.000859   0.280520 (  0.285661)
length    0.268362   0.000310   0.268672 (  0.273829)
eat!      0.341715   0.000524   0.342239 (  0.347097)
reverse   0.335301   0.000588   0.335889 (  0.340965)
delete_p  0.222297   0.000832   0.223129 (  0.228455)
delete_p!  0.225798   0.000747   0.226545 (  0.231745)

Solution 5 - Ruby

I prefer this:

str = "[12,23,987,43"
puts str[1..-1]
>> 12,23,987,43

Solution 6 - Ruby

If you always want to strip leading brackets:

"[12,23,987,43".gsub(/^\[/, "")

If you just want to remove the first character, and you know it won't be in a multibyte character set:

"[12,23,987,43"[1..-1]

or

"[12,23,987,43".slice(1..-1)

Solution 7 - Ruby

Inefficient alternative:

str.reverse.chop.reverse

Solution 8 - Ruby

For example : a = "One Two Three"

1.9.2-p290 > a = "One Two Three"
 => "One Two Three" 

1.9.2-p290 > a = a[1..-1]
 => "ne Two Three" 

1.9.2-p290 > a = a[1..-1]
 => "e Two Three" 

1.9.2-p290 > a = a[1..-1]
 => " Two Three" 

1.9.2-p290 > a = a[1..-1]
 => "Two Three" 

1.9.2-p290 > a = a[1..-1]
 => "wo Three" 

In this way you can remove one by one first character of the string.

Solution 9 - Ruby

Easy way:

str = "[12,23,987,43"

removed = str[1..str.length]

Awesome way:

class String
  def reverse_chop()
    self[1..self.length]
  end
end

"[12,23,987,43".reverse_chop()

(Note: prefer the easy way :) )

Solution 10 - Ruby

Thanks to @the-tin-man for putting together the benchmarks!

Alas, I don't really like any of those solutions. Either they require an extra step to get the result ([0] = '', .strip!) or they aren't very semantic/clear about what's happening ([1..-1]: "Um, a range from 1 to negative 1? Yearg?"), or they are slow or lengthy to write out (.gsub, .length).

What we are attempting is a 'shift' (in Array parlance), but returning the remaining characters, rather than what was shifted off. Let's use our Ruby to make this possible with strings! We can use the speedy bracket operation, but give it a good name, and take an arg to specify how much we want to chomp off the front:

class String
  def eat!(how_many = 1)
    self.replace self[how_many..-1]
  end
end

But there is more we can do with that speedy-but-unwieldy bracket operation. While we are at it, for completeness, let's write a #shift and #first for String (why should Array have all the fun‽‽), taking an arg to specify how many characters we want to remove from the beginning:

class String
  def first(how_many = 1)
    self[0...how_many]
  end

  def shift(how_many = 1)
    shifted = first(how_many)
    self.replace self[how_many..-1]
    shifted
  end
  alias_method :shift!, :shift
end

Ok, now we have a good clear way of pulling characters off the front of a string, with a method that is consistent with Array#first and Array#shift (which really should be a bang method??). And we can easily get the modified string as well with #eat!. Hm, should we share our new eat!ing power with Array? Why not!

class Array
  def eat!(how_many = 1)
    self.replace self[how_many..-1]
  end
end

Now we can:

> str = "[12,23,987,43" #=> "[12,23,987,43"
> str.eat!              #=> "12,23,987,43"
> str                   #=> "12,23,987,43"

> str.eat!(3)           #=> "23,987,43"
> str                   #=> "23,987,43"

> str.first(2)          #=> "23"
> str                   #=> "23,987,43"

> str.shift!(3)         #=> "23,"
> str                   #=> "987,43"

> arr = [1,2,3,4,5]     #=> [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] 
> arr.eat!              #=> [2, 3, 4, 5] 
> arr                   #=> [2, 3, 4, 5] 

That's better!

Solution 11 - Ruby

str = "[12,23,987,43"

str[0] = ""

Solution 12 - Ruby

class String
  def bye_felicia()
    felicia = self.strip[0] #first char, not first space.
    self.sub(felicia, '')
  end
end

Solution 13 - Ruby

Using regex:

str = 'string'
n = 1  #to remove first n characters

str[/.{#{str.size-n}}\z/] #=> "tring"

Solution 14 - Ruby

I find a nice solution to be str.delete(str[0]) for its readability, though I cannot attest to it's performance.

Solution 15 - Ruby

> list = [1,2,3,4] > list.drop(1) > > # => [2,3,4]

List drops one or more elements from the start of the array, does not mutate the array, and returns the array itself instead of the dropped element.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionNullVoxPopuliView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - RubyJason StirkView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - Rubythe Tin ManView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - RubybalanvView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - RubySRackView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - RubyhenriquesudaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - RubyChris HealdView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - RubyjaamunView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - RubyRubyistView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - RubyPablo FernandezView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 10 - RubybrookrView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 11 - RubyHandcraftsmanView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 12 - RubyJosh BrodyView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 13 - RubySagar PandyaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 14 - RubyzeitchefView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 15 - RubyAaron HendersonView Answer on Stackoverflow