What is the difference between '&' and ',' in Java generics?

While reading the Java official tutorial about generics, I found that you can restrict the type argument (in this case is T) to extend a class and/or more interfaces with the 'and' operator (&) like this:

<T extends MyClass & Serializable>

I replaced the & with , (by mistake and still works, with a minor warning).

My question is, is there any difference between these two:

<T extends MyClass & Serializable>
<T extends MyClass , Serializable> // here is with comma

And the example method:

static <T extends MyClass & Serializable> ArrayList<T> fromArrayToCollection(T[] a) {
    ArrayList<T> arr = new ArrayList<T>();
    
    for (T o : a) {
        arr.add(o); // Correct
    }
    return arr;
}

<T extends MyClass & Serializable>

This asserts that the single type parameter T must extend MyClass and must be Serializable.

<T extends MyClass , Serializable>

This declares two type parameters, one called T (which must extend MyClass) and one called Serializable (which hides java.io.Serializable — this is probably what the warning was about).