What does param: _* mean in Scala?

ScalaSyntaxScala Collections

Scala Problem Overview


Being new to Scala (2.9.1), I have a List[Event] and would like to copy it into a Queue[Event], but the following Syntax yields a Queue[List[Event]] instead:

val eventQueue = Queue(events)

For some reason, the following works:

val eventQueue = Queue(events : _*)

But I would like to understand what it does, and why it works? I already looked at the signature of the Queue.apply function:

def apply[A](elems: A*)

And I understand why the first attempt doesn't work, but what's the meaning of the second one? What is :, and _* in this case, and why doesn't the apply function just take an Iterable[A] ?

Scala Solutions


Solution 1 - Scala

a: A is type ascription; see https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2087250/what-is-the-purpose-of-type-ascription-in-scala

: _* is a special instance of type ascription which tells the compiler to treat a single argument of a sequence type as a variable argument sequence, i.e. varargs.

It is completely valid to create a Queue using Queue.apply that has a single element which is a sequence or iterable, so this is exactly what happens when you give a single Iterable[A].

Solution 2 - Scala

This is a special notation that tells the compiler to pass each element as its own argument, rather than all of it as a single argument. See here.

It is a type annotation that indicates a sequence argument and is mentioned as an "exception" to the general rule in section 4.6.2 of the language spec, "Repeated Parameters".

It is useful when a function takes a variable number of arguments, e.g. a function such as def sum(args: Int*), which can be invoked as sum(1), sum(1,2) etc. If you have a list such as xs = List(1,2,3), you can't pass xs itself, because it is a List rather than an Int, but you can pass its elements using sum(xs: _*).

Solution 3 - Scala

For Python folks:

Scala's _* operator is more or less the equivalent of Python's *-operator.


Example

Converting the scala example from the link provided by Luigi Plinge:

def echo(args: String*) = 
    for (arg <- args) println(arg)

val arr = Array("What's", "up", "doc?")
echo(arr: _*)

to Python would look like:

def echo(*args):
    for arg in args:
        print "%s" % arg

arr = ["What's", "up", "doc?"]
echo(*arr)

and both give the following output:

> What's
> up
> doc?


The Difference: unpacking positional parameters

While Python's *-operator can also deal with unpacking of positional parameters/parameters for fixed-arity functions:

def multiply (x, y):
    return x * y

operands = (2, 4)
multiply(*operands)

> 8

Doing the same with Scala:

def multiply(x:Int, y:Int) = {
	x * y;
}

val operands = (2, 4)
multiply (operands : _*)

will fail:

> not enough arguments for method multiply: (x: Int, y: Int)Int.
> Unspecified value parameter y.

But it is possible to achieve the same with scala:

def multiply(x:Int, y:Int) = {
	x*y;
}

val operands = (2, 4)
multiply _ tupled operands

According to Lorrin Nelson this is how it works:

> The first part, f _, is the syntax for a partially applied function in which none of the arguments have been specified. This works as a mechanism to get a hold of the function object. tupled returns a new function which of arity-1 that takes a single arity-n tuple.

Futher reading:

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionChrisView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - ScalaBen JamesView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - ScalaLuigi PlingeView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - ScalaMurmelView Answer on Stackoverflow