You can see a graph, but without commit messages in `Insights` =&gt; `Network` section (commit messages with authors are shown on hover).

Example: https://github.com/google/orbit/network
[![Network grap][1]][1]


  [1]: https://i.stack.imgur.com/AFjTr.png


I have a script that I run using php artisan (with **root** user), and sometimes it causes the daily log file to be created before the apache **www-data** user does - which means that when a real user uses my web application, I get the folder permission error:

&gt; Failed to open stream: Permission denied

I change the permissions back to **www-data** everytime but I want to solve this by having the log file always created with the correct permissions.

I&#39;ve considered creating a cron job that creates the file or touches it to make sure it has the right permission everyday, but I&#39;m looking for a better solution that doesn&#39;t rely on another script.

We&#39;ve also considered wrapping php artisan in another script to make sure that it is always run with the **www-data** credentials, but somethings that we want to do are actually **root** procedures that apache should not be allowed to do. 

Any more suggestions?

Laravel daily log created with wrong permissions

I set up my application for TestFlight. For external users it is waiting for review. But if I want to invite internal users, I select them and press invite. iTunes Connects says they are invited now, but none of the invited emails gets an invitation email.

Do you know what I am doing wrong?

No TestFlight invite email gets sent for internal users

In TortoiseGit, gitk or on BitBucket, it is common to have a visualization of the project history with all the branches, like this:

![enter image description here][1]

However, GutHub&#39;s commit history seems to be flat, at least I couldn&#39;t find a way to display this kind of graph. Can the GitHub&#39;s web UI somehow visualize branches like other Git clients commonly can?


  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/r1wP7.png

Visualize branches on GitHub

In TortoiseGit, gitk or on BitBucket, it is common to have a visualization of the project history with all the branches, like this:
<img src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/r1wP7.png" alt="enter image description here">
However, GutHub's commit history seems to be flat, at least I couldn't find a way to display this kind of graph. Can the GitHub's web UI somehow visualize branches like other Git clients commonly can?

Following this tutorial [[link][1]] to install gitlab on a dedicated server. I need to :

    sudo -u git -H bundle install --deployment --without development test postgres aws

But an error occurred while installing rugged :

    Gem::Installer::ExtensionBuildError: ERROR: Failed to build gem native extension.
    
        /usr/local/bin/ruby extconf.rb
    checking for cmake... no
    ERROR: CMake is required to build Rugged.
    *** extconf.rb failed ***
    Could not create Makefile due to some reason, probably lack of necessary
    libraries and/or headers.  Check the mkmf.log file for more details.  You may
    need configuration options.
    
    Provided configuration options:
    	--with-opt-dir
    	--without-opt-dir
    	--with-opt-include
    	--without-opt-include=${opt-dir}/include
    	--with-opt-lib
    	--without-opt-lib=${opt-dir}/lib
    	--with-make-prog
    	--without-make-prog
    	--srcdir=.
    	--curdir
    	--ruby=/usr/local/bin/ruby
    
    
        Gem files will remain installed in /home/git/gitlab/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.0.0/gems/rugged-0.21.2 for inspection.
        Results logged to /home/git/gitlab/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.0.0/gems/rugged-0.21.2/ext/rugged/gem_make.out
        An error occurred while installing rugged (0.21.2), and Bundler cannot continue.
        Make sure that `gem install rugged -v &#39;0.21.2&#39;` succeeds before bundling.

So I installed rugged -&gt; I installed CMake &amp; config-pkg :

    /home/git/gitlab$ sudo gem install rugged
    Building native extensions.  This could take a while...
    Successfully installed rugged-0.21.2
    Parsing documentation for rugged-0.21.2
    unable to convert &quot;\xC0&quot; from ASCII-8BIT to UTF-8 for lib/rugged/rugged.so, skipping
    1 gem installed

But it doesnt change anything : 

    Errno::EACCES: Permission denied - /home/git/gitlab/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.0.0/gems/rugged-0.21.2/LICENSE
    An error occurred while installing rugged (0.21.2), and Bundler cannot continue.
    Make sure that `gem install rugged -v &#39;0.21.2&#39;` succeeds before bundling.

Any idea ?


  [1]: http://blog.bobbyallen.me/2014/01/11/setup-your-own-private-github-server-using-gitlab-and-ubuntu-server-12-04-lts/

An error occurred while installing rugged

I&#39;m searching for the way to get `$ go get` work with private repository, after many google try.  

The first try:

    $ go get -v gitlab.com/secmask/awserver-go
    Fetching https://gitlab.com/secmask/awserver-go?go-get=1
    https fetch failed.
    Fetching http://gitlab.com/secmask/awserver-go?go-get=1
    Parsing meta tags from http://gitlab.com/secmask/awserver-go?go-get=1 (status code 200)
    import &quot;gitlab.com/secmask/awserver-go&quot;: parse http://gitlab.com/secmask/awserver-go?go-get=1: no go-import meta tags
    package gitlab.com/secmask/awserver-go: unrecognized import path &quot;gitlab.com/secmask/awserver-go

Yep, it did not see the meta tags because I could not know how to provide login information.

The second try:

Follow [https://gist.github.com/shurcooL/6927554][1]. Add config to .gitconfig.

    [url &quot;ssh://git@gitlab.com/&quot;]
    	insteadOf = https://gitlab.com/
    $ go get -v gitlab.com/secmask/awserver-go --&gt; not work
    $ go get -v gitlab.com/secmask/awserver-go.git --&gt; work but I got src/gitlab.com/secmask/awserer-go.git

Yes it work but with `.git` extension with my project name, I can rename it to original but do it everytime `$ go get` is not so good, is there an otherway?

  [1]: https://gist.github.com/shurcooL/6927554

What&#39;s the proper way to &quot;go get&quot; a private repository?

Since a few weeks, I&#39;m not able to pull or push from or to the remote repository. I thought it happend when upgrading to IntelliJ IDEA 14, but I can reproduce the problem with IDEA 13.1.5 as well.

The tooltip says
&quot;Fetch failed
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.&quot;

and the exception in the Version Control tab reads

    14:02:37.737: cd C:\dev\project
    14:02:37.737: git -c core.quotepath=false fetch origin --progress --prune
    java.io.IOException: Padding in RSA public key!
    	at com.trilead.ssh2.signature.RSASHA1Verify.decodeSSHRSAPublicKey(RSASHA1Verify.java:37)
    	at com.trilead.ssh2.KnownHosts.addHostkey(KnownHosts.java:98)
    	at com.trilead.ssh2.KnownHosts.initialize(KnownHosts.java:414)
    	at com.trilead.ssh2.KnownHosts.initialize(KnownHosts.java:440)
    	at com.trilead.ssh2.KnownHosts.addHostkeys(KnownHosts.java:137)
    	at org.jetbrains.git4idea.ssh.SSHMain.configureKnownHosts(SSHMain.java:462)
    	at org.jetbrains.git4idea.ssh.SSHMain.start(SSHMain.java:155)
    	at org.jetbrains.git4idea.ssh.SSHMain.main(SSHMain.java:137)
    fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
    Please make sure you have the correct access rights
    and the repository exists.

Using the built-in terminal of IntelliJ, executing `git -c core.quotepath=false fetch origin --progress --prune`, it works just as it should.


According to the stacktrace, there seems to be a problem with my `KnownHosts`, so I deleted our git server from `~/.ssh/known_hosts`, hoping IntelliJ would insert it again. But the problem still appears when updating via the UI, and there is no new entry written in `known_hosts`; thinking about some caching of the file, I restarted IntelliJ, without success.

When doing another `git fetch` from the terminal, now I&#39;m getting asked if I want to permanently add the server. After that, it has been written to `known_hosts` again, but IntelliJ still won&#39;t let me update my project.

I haven&#39;t found anything about this behavior online, so I guess it&#39;s not a known bug with the new IntelliJ version. Nevertheless, I updated to 14.0.2, but the problem still exists.

IntelliJ is configured to use the built-in SSH executable.

Does anybody have a clue what could be the problem here?

git with IntelliJ IDEA: Could not read from remote repository

I&#39;d like to check out a previously created pull request (created via GitHub web interface). I searched and found different places where a refs/pull or refs/pull/pr

But when I add `fetch = +refs/pull/*/head:refs/remotes/origin/pr/*` to the git config file and do a git fetch

What I&#39;m doing wrong? Should GitHub create automatically the pull/xyz stuff, or do I have to configure something?

How can I check out a GitHub pull request with git?

    git init --bare test-repo.git
    cd test-repo.git

(Folder is created with git-ish files and folders inside)

    git status

**fatal: This operation must be run in a work tree**
(Okay, so I can&#39;t use git status with a bare repo; makes sense I guess)

    git branch

(Nothing, it seems the bare repo doesn&#39;t contain any branches. Do I have to add them from a cloned repo?)

    cd ..
    mkdir test-clone
    cd test-clone
    git clone ../test-repo.git

(I get a warning about cloning an empty repository)

    cd test-repo

(The prompt changes to indicate I am on the master branch)

    git branch

(Shows no results - eh?)

    git branch master

**fatal: Not a valid object name: &#39;master&#39;**

Um. So how do I create the master branch in my bare repo?

How do I create a master branch in a bare Git repository?

I&#39;m getting this issue while logging in on GitHub on Android Studio: 
&gt;Can&#39;t login: Can&#39;t get user info 404: Not found

![][1]



  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/u7GIX.png

Has someone faced this issue? How can I get around this?

Android Studio can&#39;t login to GitHub

My android device broke and I lost access to Github and Bitbucket 2 factor authentication codes.

Unfortunately I didn&#39;t save the recovery codes or set up a backup phone number to receive codes by SMS, and I&#39;m not signed in to Github and Bitbucket on any computer.

Is there another way to gain access to my Github and Bitbucket account?


Is there a way to restore Github and Bitbucket 2FA without recovery codes or backup phone number?

I just created a Github repository and was wondering what the `.gitignore` file was for. I started by not creating one, but added one due to the fact that most repositories have one.
Do I need to have one? Can/do I just ignore it, or does it have a use?

What is .gitignore?

Basically I used [Github revert button][1] to revert a previous PR for a **feature branch** into `master`, then I decided to merge the same **feature branch** that I reverted earlier, but I was not able to do so. Steps as follow:

1. PR to merge **feature branch** to `master`
2. Revert PR merge from (`master`)
3. Tried to create new PR to merge feature branch to `master` again.
4. Got this message:

&gt; There isn&#39;t anything to compare.
&gt;
&gt; master is up to date with all commits from feature-branch. Try switching the base for your comparison.


Any suggestions on how can I merge **feature branch** again into `master`


  [1]: https://github.com/blog/1857-introducing-the-revert-button

How to PR and merge again after reverting PR using Github Revert Button

My team alternates between usage of dev and master as default branch for several repos and I would like to write a script that checks for the default branch when entering a directory.

When pull requests are opened in some of these repos, they either default to &#39;dev&#39; or &#39;master&#39; as the merge target.

I understand how to set this information but not retrieve it: 
https://help.github.com/articles/setting-the-default-branch/

Is there a git command available to determine default branch for remote repository?

git - how to get default branch?

A &quot;Stale&quot; git branch is a term I&#39;ve heard a lot. I know it has something to do with branches which are regarded as less useful or useless, but cannot find an exact definition. What is a &quot;stale&quot; git branch?

What is a &quot;stale&quot; git branch?

While using Gitflow, what is the reason for separating branch naming to feature vs bugfix vs hotfix?

I.e. why not just, for example, instead of:

    feature/
    bugfix/
    hotfix/

Just do:

    change/

What does separating by feature/bugfix/hotfix buy?



Gitflow feature vs bugfix branch naming

I&#39;m on a branch with some changes.  Changing branch is a pain as some files are locked by processes, so to change branch I&#39;d have to stop all the processes which have locks, then `stash` the changes before checking out the other branch to see its log.

Is it possible to view the log for a different branch, without having to check it out?

How can I print the log for a branch other than the current one?

So my history looks like this:

```
o---o---o---o  master
     \
      o---o---o  A
               \
                o B
```

So, to explain:

- I have branch `A` which was started from `master`
- I have branch `B` (with only 1 commit) which was started from `A`

What I want is this:

```
o---o---o---o  master
             \
              o---o---o  A
                       \
                        o B
```

---

What I did was:

1).

```
git checkout A
git rebase master
```

This resulted in a lot of conflicts which, after some significant time spent fixing, the following history emerged:

```
o---o---o---o  master
             \
              o---o---o  A
```

Which is exactly what I wanted.

(I don&#39;t know where `B` is right now)

---

2).

After this I did a lot of squashes and changed the order of commits on `A`, to make the history look like I want.

---

3).

Now, what I also want to do is:

```
git checkout B
git rebase A
```

However this doesn&#39;t seem to work and I don&#39;t know why. If I do `git log` I see the commits which were there before I did step 1.

Also, I get the same huge number of conflicts which I already solved at step 1. I spent significant time doing it, don&#39;t want to do it again.

[This example](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27445747/how-to-rebase-over-already-rebased-branch) suggested to use `--onto`, which I did:

```
git checkout B
git rebase --onto A
```

But this deletes the commit on `B` entirely and makes `A` and `B` point to the same commit i.e. the last one on `A`.

---

My question is: **How can I effectively rebase B off A so that it looks like B started from A** ? (which was actually true in the beginning).

My best guess is that I&#39;m using `--onto` wrong. Or that I should use something else (like `cherry-pick`).

Content Type	Original Author	Original Content on Stackoverflow
Question	Borek Bernard	View Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - Git	Ruslan Ostafiichuk	View Answer on Stackoverflow

Visualize branches on GitHub

Git Problem Overview

Git Solutions

Solution 1 - Git

No TestFlight invite email gets sent for internal users

Laravel daily log created with wrong permissions

Attributions