Use async await with Array.map
JavascriptTypescriptPromiseAsync AwaitEcmascript 2017Javascript Problem Overview
Given the following code:
var arr = [1,2,3,4,5];
var results: number[] = await arr.map(async (item): Promise<number> => {
await callAsynchronousOperation(item);
return item + 1;
});
which produces the following error:
> TS2322: Type 'Promise<number>[]' is not assignable to type 'number[]'. > Type 'Promise<number> is not assignable to type 'number'.
How can I fix it? How can I make async await
and Array.map
work together?
Javascript Solutions
Solution 1 - Javascript
The problem here is that you are trying to await
an array of promises rather than a Promise. This doesn't do what you expect.
When the object passed to await
is not a Promise, await
simply returns the value as-is immediately instead of trying to resolve it. So since you passed await
an array (of Promise objects) here instead of a Promise, the value returned by await is simply that array, which is of type Promise<number>[]
.
What you probably want to do is call Promise.all
on the array returned by map
in order to convert it to a single Promise before await
ing it.
According to the MDN docs for Promise.all
:
> The Promise.all(iterable)
method returns a promise that resolves
> when all of the promises in the iterable argument have resolved, or
> rejects with the reason of the first passed promise that rejects.
So in your case:
var arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
var results: number[] = await Promise.all(arr.map(async (item): Promise<number> => {
await callAsynchronousOperation(item);
return item + 1;
}));
This will resolve the specific error you are encountering here.
Depending on exactly what it is you're trying to do you may also consider using Promise.allSettled
, Promise.any
, or Promise.race
instead of Promise.all
, though in most situations (almost certainly including this one) Promise.all
will be the one you want.
Solution 2 - Javascript
Solution below to properly use async await and Array.map together. Process all elements of the array in parallel, asynchronously AND preserve the order:
const arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8];
const randomDelay = () => new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, Math.random() * 1000));
const calc = async n => {
await randomDelay();
return n * 2;
};
const asyncFunc = async () => {
const unresolvedPromises = arr.map(n => calc(n));
const results = await Promise.all(unresolvedPromises);
};
asyncFunc();
Also codepen.
Notice we only "await" for Promise.all. We call calc without "await" multiple times, and we collect an array of unresolved promises right away. Then Promise.all waits for resolution of all of them and returns an array with the resolved values in order.
Solution 3 - Javascript
There's another solution for it if you are not using native Promises but Bluebird.
You could also try using Promise.map(), mixing the array.map and Promise.all
In you case:
var arr = [1,2,3,4,5];
var results: number[] = await Promise.map(arr, async (item): Promise<number> => {
await callAsynchronousOperation(item);
return item + 1;
});
Solution 4 - Javascript
If you map to an array of Promises, you can then resolve them all to an array of numbers. See Promise.all.
Solution 5 - Javascript
You can use:
for await (let resolvedPromise of arrayOfPromises) {
console.log(resolvedPromise)
}
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/for-await...of
If you wish to use Promise.all()
instead you can go for Promise.allSettled()
So you can have better control over rejected promises.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise/allSettled
Solution 6 - Javascript
This is simplest way to do it.
await Promise.all(
arr.map(async (element) => {
....
})
)
Solution 7 - Javascript
I'd recommend using Promise.all as mentioned above, but if you really feel like avoiding that approach, you can do a for or any other loop:
const arr = [1,2,3,4,5];
let resultingArr = [];
for (let i in arr){
await callAsynchronousOperation(i);
resultingArr.push(i + 1)
}
FYI: If you want to iterate over items of an array, rather than indices (@ralfoide 's comment), use of
instead of in
inside let i in arr
statement.
Solution 8 - Javascript
A solution using modern-async's map():
import { map } from 'modern-async'
...
const result = await map(myArray, async (v) => {
...
})
The advantage of using that library is that you can control the concurrency using mapLimit() or mapSeries().
Solution 9 - Javascript
I had a task on BE side to find all entities from a repo, and to add a new property url and to return to controller layer. This is how I achieved it (thanks to Ajedi32's response):
async findAll(): Promise<ImageResponse[]> {
const images = await this.imageRepository.find(); // This is an array of type Image (DB entity)
const host = this.request.get('host');
const mappedImages = await Promise.all(images.map(image => ({...image, url: `http://${host}/images/${image.id}`}))); // This is an array of type Object
return plainToClass(ImageResponse, mappedImages); // Result is an array of type ImageResponse
}
Note: Image (entity) doesn't have property url, but ImageResponse - has
Solution 10 - Javascript
This might help someone.
const APISimulator = (v) => new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
setTimeout(() => {
resolve({ data: v });
}, v * 100);
});
const arr = [7, 6, 5, 1, 2, 3];
const res = () => arr.reduce(async (memo, v, i) => {
const results = await memo;
console.log(`proccessing item-${i + 1} :`, v)
await APISimulator(v);
console.log(`completed proccessing-${i + 1} :`, v)
return [...results, v];
}, []);
res().then(proccessed => console.log(proccessed))