(Unknown Source) in Exception stack trace

JavaExceptionStack Trace

Java Problem Overview


Background

> This question is related to Why does String.valueOf(null) throw a NullPointerException?

Consider the following snippet:

public class StringValueOfNull {
	public static void main(String[] args) {
		String.valueOf(null);

		// programmer intention is to invoke valueOf(Object), but instead
		// code invokes valueOf(char[]) and throws NullPointerException
	}
}

As explained in the answer to the linked question, Java's method overloading resolves the above invokation to String.valueOf(char[]), which rightfully results in a NullPointerException at run-time.

Compiled in Eclipse and javac 1.6.0_17, this is the stack trace:

Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
        at java.lang.String.<init>(Unknown Source)
        at java.lang.String.valueOf(Unknown Source)
        at StringValueOfNull.main(StringValueOfNull.java:3)

Note that the stack trace above is missing the KEY information: it does NOT have the full signature of the valueOf method! It just says String.valueOf(Unknown Source)!

In most situations I've encountered, exception stack traces always have the complete signature of the methods that are actually in the stack trace, which of course is very helpful in identifying the problem immediately and a major reason why the stack trace (which needless to say is rather expensive to construct) is provided in the first place.

And yet, in this case, the stack trace does not help at all. It has failed miserably in helping the programmer identify the problem.

As is, I can see 3 ways that a programmer can identify the problem with the above snippet:

  • Programmer realizes on his/her own that the method is overloaded, and by resolution rule, the "wrong" overload gets invoked in this case
  • Programmer uses a good IDE that allows him/her to quickly see which method is selected
    • In Eclipse, for example, mouse-hovering on the above expression quickly tells programmer that the String valueOf(char[] data) is indeed the one selected
  • Programmer examines the bytecode (ugh!)

The last option is probably the least accessible, but of course is the Ultimate Answer (a programmer may misunderstood the overloading rule, IDE may be buggy, but bytecodes always(?) tell the truth on what's being done).


The questions
  • Why is the stack trace so uninformative in this case with regards to the signatures of the methods that are actually in the stack trace?
    • Is this due to the compiler? The runtime? Something else?
  • In what other (rare?) scenarios can the stack trace fail to capture essential information like these?

Java Solutions


Solution 1 - Java

Note that if you are using Ant build and if the debug attribute set to false in javac command this could happen.

ex : if you need proper location in trace set debug = true in Ant build,

	<javac verbose="false" srcdir="${src}" destdir="${classdir}" debug="true" includes="**/*.java">
		<classpath refid="compile.classpath" />
	</javac>

Solution 2 - Java

This is normally related to missing debug information. You are probably using JRE (not JDK), which does not include debug information for rt.jar classes. Try using full JDK, you'll get proper locations in the stack trace:

Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
	at java.lang.String.<init>(String.java:177)
	at java.lang.String.valueOf(String.java:2840)
	at StringValueOfNull.main(StringValueOfNull.java:3)

Solution 3 - Java

I had the same problem, I'm using spring and apache ant for continuous integration.

The error I had was in the build.xml file.

The gender change log with more precise content was:

build.xml with the error:

	<javac srcdir="${src.home}" destdir="${work.home}/WEB-INF/classes">
		<classpath refid="compile.classpath" />
	</javac>

build.xml without error:

	<javac srcdir="${src.home}" destdir="${work.home}/WEB-INF/classes"  debug="true">
		<classpath refid="compile.classpath" />
	</javac>

Within the structure I lacked the courage debug = "true"

Solution 4 - Java

I ran the code in Eclipse and I got the following output,

public class Aloof {
	public static void main(String[] args) {
		String.valueOf(null);
	}
}

Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
	at java.lang.String.<init>(String.java:177)
	at java.lang.String.valueOf(String.java:2840)
	at mysql.Aloof.main(Aloof.java:19)

If you include the full source (from JDK), you can actually debug to the line 177 in String.java

Solution 5 - Java

This happens when there is no debug (line) information in the source or the VM is told to throw that information away at class loading time. Since you have some line numbers, it's not the VM setting but the class String is missing debug information.

Solution 6 - Java

In Eclipse: Preferences > Java > Installed JREs. The checked entry should have a path inside the JDK, e.g. C:\Program Files (x86)\Java\jdk1.7.0_55\jre.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionpolygenelubricantsView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - JavaSupun SameeraView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - JavaunbeliView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - JavajamlhetView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - JavabragboyView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - JavaAaron DigullaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - JavaPeter TsengView Answer on Stackoverflow