This functionality is provided using `tfpt unshelve /migrate`. To use it, follow these steps:

 1. Create a shelveset of your changes (from the UI, or `tf shelve . /R`)
 2. Create the new branch
 3. Download and install the [Team Foundation Server Power Tools][1]
 4. From a Visual Studio Command Prompt, run the following command: `tfpt unshelve /migrate /source:$/TeamProject/Main /target:$/TeamProject/Beta`

This will essentially re-write the paths in your shelveset to the new branch. 


  [1]: http://visualstudiogallery.msdn.microsoft.com/c255a1e4-04ba-4f68-8f4e-cd473d6b971f

I am trying to compile my JasperReports template using an Ant script and Java. I am getting this error:

    jasper java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
    org/codehaus/groovy/control/CompilationFailedException

There is nothing complex in the template, but I still can&#39;t compile.

Why do I get compilation error &quot;org/codehaus/groovy/control/CompilationFailedException&quot;?

I have a model with an optional file field

    class MyModel(models.Model):
      name = models.CharField(max_length=50)
      sound = models.FileField(upload_to=&#39;audio/&#39;, blank=True)

---
Let&#39;s put a value

    &gt;&gt;&gt; test = MyModel(name=&#39;machin&#39;)
    &gt;&gt;&gt; test.save()

---
Why do I get that ?

    &gt;&gt;&gt; test.sound
    &lt;FieldFile: None&gt;
    &gt;&gt;&gt; test.sound is None
    False

---
How can I check if there is a file set ?  


Django - FileField check if None

I made changes to a lot of files, and in the meantime I figured I rather commit this untested code to a yet-to-be-created branch, so that users of the existing code base are not affected.

As I touched really many, many files and created and added new sub-projects etc., I want to avoid copying files and folders manually.

What&#39;s the easiest way to get this done in Visual Studio?

TFS: submit changes done locally in one branch to another branch

I made changes to a lot of files, and in the meantime I figured I rather commit this untested code to a yet-to-be-created branch, so that users of the existing code base are not affected.
As I touched really many, many files and created and added new sub-projects etc., I want to avoid copying files and folders manually.
What's the easiest way to get this done in Visual Studio?

Whenever I&#39;m trying to install something or even just list the packages I get this error &quot;The underlying connection was closed: Could not establish trust relationship for the SSL/TLS secure channel&quot;

I tried [this][1] solution from Codeplex with no luck.

I use the [latest version of Nuget][2].

I also tried different options in devenv.exe.config like this:

    &lt;servicePointManager  checkCertificateName=&quot;false&quot;    checkCertificateRevocationList=&quot;false&quot;/&gt;




  [1]: http://nuget.codeplex.com/workitem/1623
  [2]: http://visualstudiogallery.msdn.microsoft.com/27077b70-9dad-4c64-adcf-c7cf6bc9970c

Visual Studio 2010 nuget error: The underlying connection was closed: Could not establish trust relationship for the SSL/TLS secure channel

When editing C# code in Visual Studio 2010, the &lt;kbd&gt;ENTER&lt;/kbd&gt; key makes IntelliSense complete the current suggestion, without adding a new line.

In VB.NET, the default IntelliSense behavior for the &lt;kbd&gt;ENTER&lt;/kbd&gt; key is to add a new line after completing the current suggestion.

How can I configure IntelliSense to change the VB.NET behavior to the C# one?

I already know that I could press &lt;kbd&gt;TAB&lt;/kbd&gt; or &lt;kbd&gt;SPACE&lt;/kbd&gt;, but out of habit I always end up hitting &lt;kbd&gt;ENTER&lt;/kbd&gt; (and changing line).

VB.NET IntelliSense : Disable newline on ENTER autocomplete

Almost unconsciously I hit the keyboard build macro that builds my entire solution. This can happen just as I notice a code change. The build dominates my computer, and I basically have to wait till it finishes. 10 seconds!

How can I cancel a build?


How do I cancel a build that is in progress in Visual Studio?

I&#39;m new to Visual Studio 2010 and C#. How can I indent the selected text to left/right by using shortcuts?


![enter image description here][1]


  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/DVw7b.png

In the Delphi IDE the equivalents are &lt;kbd&gt;Ctrl&lt;/kbd&gt;+&lt;kbd&gt;Shift&lt;/kbd&gt;+&lt;kbd&gt;I&lt;/kbd&gt; and &lt;kbd&gt;Ctrl&lt;/kbd&gt;+&lt;kbd&gt;Shift&lt;/kbd&gt;+&lt;kbd&gt;U&lt;/kbd&gt;

Indentation shortcuts in Visual Studio

I have an automated build process that I&#39;d like to extend so I can build the libraries I am distributing via NuGet.  Currently, running nuget.exe to create the packages is a manual operation.

**What is the best way to setup VS 2010 so that my NuGet package (*.nupkg) file is the end result of a &quot;Release&quot; build?**

Keep in mind that I have other files (content and tools) for some of the packages. And, in most cases, I have multiple projects merged into a single NuGet package to support .NET 4, Silveright and Phone 7.

*(I should clarify that the existing &quot;automated&quot; process is a simple batch-file runner that builds a solution using the command line.)*

**UPDATE**

I want to refresh this discussion because the issue has not been resolved.  While the link @pravin supplied is helpful, it doesn&#39;t address the fact that I have multiple projects in a single package as well as other contents like PowerShell scripts, configuration and source code transformations, etc.

The best example I can use is an assembly that has both a .NET 4 and Silverlight 5 version. These are distributed in the same package.  I cannot use a post-build event to create the package because the package is dependent upon TWO projects.

Automating creating NuGet package as part of build process

There is one file that I always made changes to, but that I never want to be checked in.  I would like TFS to block me from ever checking it in or committing the changes.  How can I configure TFS to do this?

Details:
There is another developer on the project that has checked in some bad code that I prefer to comment out on my local machine.  Since they are a client, I prefer to keep this a technical exercise rather than make it a political one.

How can I always block checkin of a specific file in TFS

I can find the shelve button okay, and had shelved changes earlier today, but now I can&#39;t seem to find a way to unshelve them! This has left me in quite a predicament!

If this button is in fact missing in the Visual Studio 11 Beta, perhaps there is a console based TFS command I can execute to temporarily accomplish this? 


Thanks all, I actually can&#39;t find an answer on Google for this either.

Can anybody find the TFS &quot;Unshelve&quot; option in Visual Studio 2012?

I deleted some files and some folders in TFS. Many check in&#39;s later I found out that I need the deleted functionality back in my project. 

How can I restore the deleted files and folders?

TFS: Restore deleted folders and items

VS2012 seems to remove the popup window for TFS check-ins that was in VS2010. It now seems to take over the team explorer tab in my sidebar, and buries the important things - like which files I&#39;ve changed. Is there any way to return to a normal popup window for check-ins in VS2012?

VS2012 return to a normal TFS checkin window?

We just moved to use TFS 2012 which seems to be a huge upgrade for 2008 in usability with VS2012.

However, there is a very annoying feature with &quot;My Work&quot; feature if you connect your work with a certain task. After you have connected the task with your work item, any checkin to any branch will mark the task to &quot;done&quot; status. How can I disable this? I&#39;d like to have the development branch so that I can make small commits during development but with this feature I cannot connect the task with my current work if I do so. The only way to do this (which I know) is to select the task for my current work just before I merge all small commits from my personal branch to master. Yes this is doable but it isn&#39;t as nice workflow as it may be.

With taskboard feature in scrum template moving tasks to done after work is done is anyway trivial and common part of workflow. Automatic done movement is pretty annoying automation which shouldn&#39;t be there.

So my questions are: How to disable this? Is this feature part of template or some much more deeper integration with TFS work item management?

We are using Scrum 2.0 template from Microsoft.

How to disable auto done status for task in checkin

How can I list git branches showing and sorting by their last commits&#39; dates?

I&#39;ve found [this](http://www.commandlinefu.com/commands/view/2345/show-git-branches-by-date-useful-for-showing-active-branches):

    for k in `git branch | sed s/^..//`; do
        echo -e `git log -1 --pretty=format:&quot;%Cgreen%ci %Cblue%cr%Creset&quot; &quot;$k&quot;`\\t&quot;$k&quot;;
    done | sort -r

I&#39;d expect plain git to have this feature. Does it?

I also found `git show-branch --date-order` but the output is something different.

Git: List git branches, sort by (and show) date

I understand the scenario presented in Pro Git about [The Perils of Rebasing][1]. The author basically tells you how to avoid duplicated commits:

&gt; Do not rebase commits that you have pushed to a public repository.

I am going to tell you my particular situation because I think it does not exactly fit the Pro Git scenario and I still end up with duplicated commits.

Let&#39;s say I have two remote branches with their local counterparts:

    origin/master    origin/dev
    |                |
    master           dev

All four branches contains the same commits and I am going to start development in `dev`:

    origin/master : C1 C2 C3 C4
    master        : C1 C2 C3 C4
    
    origin/dev    : C1 C2 C3 C4
    dev           : C1 C2 C3 C4

After a couple of commits I push the changes to `origin/dev`:

    origin/master : C1 C2 C3 C4
    master        : C1 C2 C3 C4
    
    origin/dev    : C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6  # (2) git push
    dev           : C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6  # (1) git checkout dev, git commit

I have to go back to `master` to make a quick fix:

    origin/master : C1 C2 C3 C4 C7  # (2) git push
    master        : C1 C2 C3 C4 C7  # (1) git checkout master, git commit
    
    origin/dev    : C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6
    dev           : C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6

And back to `dev` I rebase the changes to include the quick fix in my actual development:

    origin/master : C1 C2 C3 C4 C7
    master        : C1 C2 C3 C4 C7
    
    origin/dev    : C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6
    dev           : C1 C2 C3 C4 C7 C5&#39; C6&#39;  # git checkout dev, git rebase master

If I display the history of commits with GitX/gitk I notice that `origin/dev` now contains two identical commits `C5&#39;` and `C6&#39;` which are different to Git. Now if I push the changes to `origin/dev` this is the result:

    origin/master : C1 C2 C3 C4 C7
    master        : C1 C2 C3 C4 C7
    
    origin/dev    : C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C5&#39; C6&#39;  # git push
    dev           : C1 C2 C3 C4 C7 C5&#39; C6&#39;

Maybe I don&#39;t fully understand the explanation in Pro Git, so I would like to know two things:

 1. Why does Git duplicate these commits while rebasing? Is there a particular reason to do that instead of just applying `C5` and `C6` after `C7`?
 2. How can I avoid that? Would it be wise to do it?

  [1]: https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Branching-Rebasing#_rebase_peril

Git commits are duplicated in the same branch after doing a rebase

I just renamed my local branch using

    git branch -m oldname newname

but this only renames the local version of the branch. How can I rename the one on&#160;GitHub?

Renaming a branch in GitHub

I have **master** and **new-project** branches. And now I&#39;d like to create a brand new repo with its master based on the new-project branch.

Background: I have one repository which contains three independent applications. It didn&#39;t start out this way. There was originally just one app in the repo. Over time, however, business needs have changed. One app became two (a legacy version and a re-write.) A web service was added. Separate branches were used to contain the three projects. However, they don&#39;t share any code. And so it&#39;d be simpler to have them split out into their own repos.

How do I create a new GitHub repo from a branch in an existing repo?

My colleague and I are working on the same repository. We&#39;ve branched it into two branches, each technically for different projects, but they have similarities, so we&#39;ll sometimes want to commit back to the *`master` from the `branch`.

However, I have the `branch`. How can my colleague pull that branch specifically?

A `git clone` of the repository does not seem to create the branches locally for him, though I can see them live on unfuddle after a push on my end.

Also, when I originally made the branch, I did `-b checkout`. Does that make much difference?

    $ git branch -r
    origin/HEAD -&gt; origin/master
    origin/daves_branch
    origin/discover
    origin/master

    $ git fetch origin discover
    $ git checkout discover

These are the commands I ran. But it definitely is not working.

**I want to be able to check out that branch and then push and commit back just the branches changes from various collaborators or workstations**.


Content Type	Original Author	Original Content on Stackoverflow
Question	Evgeniy Berezovsky	View Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - Visual Studio-2010	Grant Holliday	View Answer on Stackoverflow

TFS: submit changes done locally in one branch to another branch

Visual Studio-2010 Problem Overview

Visual Studio-2010 Solutions

Solution 1 - Visual Studio-2010

Django - FileField check if None

Why do I get compilation error "org/codehaus/groovy/control/CompilationFailedException"?

Attributions