SyntaxError: Use of const in strict mode

Javascriptnode.js

Javascript Problem Overview


I'm working with node.js, and in one of my js files I'm using const in "strict mode". When trying to run it, I'm getting an error:

SyntaxError: Use of const in strict mode.

What is the best practice to do this?

Edit:

'use strict'
const MAX_IMAGE_SIZE = 1024*1024; // 1 MB

Javascript Solutions


Solution 1 - Javascript

The const and let are part of ECMAScript 2015 (a.k.a. ES6 and Harmony), and was not enabled by default in Node.js 0.10 or 0.12. Since Node.js 4.x, “All shipping [ES2015] features, which V8 considers stable, are turned on by default on Node.js and do NOT require any kind of runtime flag.”. Node.js docs has an overview of what ES2015 features are enabled by default, and which who require a runtime flag. So by upgrading to Node.js 4.x or newer the error should disappear.

To enable some of the ECMAScript 2015 features (including const and let) in Node.js 0.10 and 0.12; start your node program with a harmony flag, otherwise you will get a syntax error. For example:

node --harmony app.js

It all depends on which side your strict js is located. I would recommend using strict mode with const declarations on your server side and start the server with the harmony flag. For the client side, you should use Babel or similar tool to convert ES2015 to ES5, since not all client browsers support the const declarations.

Solution 2 - Javascript

If this is happening in nodejs, it is due to the older version of nodejs. Update node by using,

  1. Clear NPM's cache:

    sudo npm cache clean -f

  2. Install a little helper called 'n'

    sudo npm install -g n

  3. Install latest stable NodeJS version

    sudo n stable

Update nodejs instructions taken from, https://stackoverflow.com/a/19584407/698072

Solution 3 - Javascript

Usually this error occurs when the version of node against which the code is being executed is older than expected. (i.e. 0.12 or older).

if you are using nvm than please ensure that you have the right version of node being used. You can check the compatibility on node.green for const under strict mode

I found a similar issue on another post and posted my answer there in detail

Solution 4 - Javascript

One important step after you update your node is to link your node binary to the latest installed node version

sudo ln -sf /usr/local/n/versions/node/6.0.0/bin/node /usr/bin/node  

Solution 5 - Javascript

This is probably not the solution for everyone, but it was for me.

If you are using NVM, you might not have enabled the right version of node for the code you are running. After you reboot, your default version of node changes back to the system default.

Was running into this when working with react-native which had been working fine. Just use nvm to use the right version of node to solve this problem.

Solution 6 - Javascript

Since the time the question was asked, the draft for the const keyword is already a living standard as part of ECMAScript 2015. Also the current version of Node.js supports const declarations without the --harmony flag.

With the above said you can now run node app.js, with app.js:

'use strict';
const MB = 1024 * 1024;
...

getting both the syntax sugar and the benefits of strict mode.

Solution 7 - Javascript

I had a similar issue recently and ended up in this Q&A. This is not the solution the OP was looking for but may help others with a similar issue.

I'm using PM2 to run a project and in a given staging server I had a really old version of Node, NPM and PM2. I updated everything, however, I kept keeping the same error:

> SyntaxError: Use of const in strict mode.

I tried to stop and start the application several times. Also tried to update everything again. Nothing worked. Until I noticed a warning when I ran pm2 start:

> >>>> In-memory PM2 is out-of-date, do:
> >>>> $ pm2 update
> In memory PM2 version: 0.15.10
> Local PM2 version: 3.2.9

Gotcha! After running pm2 update, I finally was able to get the application running as expected. No "const in strict mode" errors anymore.

Solution 8 - Javascript

I was using pm2 to start and maintain the node processes.

From the CLI it worked perfectly.

which node
/usr/local/bin/node
node -v
v10.15.0

However, I set up a cronjob and I got the syntax error.

Then wrote a cronjob to check which node and node -v and surprisingly, it was a different path and version.

which node
/usr/bin/node
node -v
v0.10.48

To fix the cronjob I had to use the flag --interpreter for pm2, like so:

pm2 start dist/server.js --interpreter=/usr/local/bin/node 

Solution 9 - Javascript

The use of const in strict mode is available with the release of Chrome 41. Currently, Chrome 41 Beta is already released and supports it.

Solution 10 - Javascript

cd /
npm install -g nave
nave use 6.11.1
node app.js

Solution 11 - Javascript

const is not supported by ECMAScript. So after you specify strict mode, you get syntax error. You need to use var instead of const if you want your code to be compatible with all browsers. I know, not the ideal solution, but it is what it is. There are ways to create read-only properties in JavaScript (see https://stackoverflow.com/questions/366047/can-read-only-properties-be-implemented-in-pure-javascript) but I think it might be overkill depending on your scenario.

Below is browser compatibility note from MDN:

Browser compatibility

> The current implementation of const is a Mozilla-specific extension > and is not part of ECMAScript 5. It is supported in Firefox & Chrome > (V8). As of Safari 5.1.7 and Opera 12.00, if you define a variable > with const in these browsers, you can still change its value later. It > is not supported in Internet Explorer 6-10, but is included in > Internet Explorer 11. The const keyword currently declares the > constant in the function scope (like variables declared with var). > > Firefox, at least since version 13, throws a TypeError if you > redeclare a constant. None of the major browsers produce any notices > or errors if you assign another value to a constant. The return value > of such an operation is that of the new value assigned, but the > reassignment is unsuccessful only in Firefox and Chrome (at least > since version 20). > > const is going to be defined by ECMAScript 6, but with different > semantics. Similar to variables declared with the let statement, > constants declared with const will be block-scoped.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionVivek PView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - JavascriptAlexanderView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - JavascriptStrangerView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - JavascriptG GView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - JavascriptShri ShindeView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - JavascriptboatcoderView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - JavascriptdodevView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - JavascriptGustavo StraubeView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - JavascriptKlaassiekView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - JavascriptmorkroView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 10 - JavascriptAyhmiView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 11 - JavascriptShital ShahView Answer on Stackoverflow