std::to_string - more than instance of overloaded function matches the argument list

C++Visual Studio-2010Visual C++C++11

C++ Problem Overview


counter is an int

void SentryManager::add(std::string name,std::shared_ptr<Sentry>){
	name = name + std::to_string(counter);
}

What would be the best way to stop this error? When I was being lazy I just made the int long long (or something), but I'm sure there is a better way of solving this.

Error message:

sentrymanager.cpp(8): error C2668: 'std::to_string' : ambiguous call to overloaded function

I am using Visual C++ 2010 Express.

C++ Solutions


Solution 1 - C++

In VC++ 2010 there are three overloads of std::to_string that take long long, unsigned long long, and long double, respectively – clearly int is none of these, and no one conversion is better than another (demo), so the conversion cannot be done implicitly/unambiguously.

In terms of real C++11 support, this is a failing on the part of VC++ 2010's standard library implementation – the C++11 standard itself actually calls for nine overloads of std::to_string ([string.conversions]/7):

> string to_string(int val); string to_string(unsigned val); string to_string(long val); string to_string(unsigned long val); string to_string(long long val); string to_string(unsigned long long val); string to_string(float val); string to_string(double val); string to_string(long double val);

Had all of these overloads been present, you obviously wouldn't have this problem; however, VC++ 2010 wasn't based on the actual C++11 standard (which did not yet exist at the time of its release), but rather on N3000 (from 2009), which does not call for these additional overloads. Consequently, it's harsh to blame VC++ too much here...

In any case, for only a handful of calls, there's nothing wrong with using a cast to resolve the ambiguity yourself:

void SentryManager::add(std::string& name, std::shared_ptr<Sentry>) {
    name += std::to_string(static_cast<long long>(counter));
}

Or, if there's heavy usage of std::to_string in your codebase, write a few wrappers and use those instead – this way, no call-site casting is needed:

#include <type_traits>
#include <string>

template<typename T>
inline
typename std::enable_if<std::is_integral<T>::value && std::is_signed<T>::value, std::string>::type
to_string(T const val) {
    return std::to_string(static_cast<long long>(val));
}

template<typename T>
inline
typename std::enable_if<std::is_integral<T>::value && std::is_unsigned<T>::value, std::string>::type
to_string(T const val) {
    return std::to_string(static_cast<unsigned long long>(val));
}

template<typename T>
inline typename std::enable_if<std::is_floating_point<T>::value, std::string>::type
to_string(T const val) {
    return std::to_string(static_cast<long double>(val));
}

// ...

void SentryManager::add(std::string& name, std::shared_ptr<Sentry>) {
    name += to_string(counter);
}

I can't check whether VC++ 2010 succeeds or fails with the above usage of SFINAE; if it fails, the following – using tag dispatch instead of SFINAE – should be compilable (if potentially less clear):

#include <type_traits>
#include <string>

namespace detail {
    template<typename T>                   // is_float         is_unsigned
    inline std::string to_string(T const val, std::false_type, std::false_type) {
        return std::to_string(static_cast<long long>(val));
    }

    template<typename T>                   // is_float         is_unsigned
    inline std::string to_string(T const val, std::false_type, std::true_type) {
        return std::to_string(static_cast<unsigned long long>(val));
    }

    template<typename T, typename _>       // is_float
    inline std::string to_string(T const val, std::true_type, _) {
        return std::to_string(static_cast<long double>(val));
    }
}

template<typename T>
inline std::string to_string(T const val) {
    return detail::to_string(val, std::is_floating_point<T>(), std::is_unsigned<T>());
}

Solution 2 - C++

You have tripped over C++ DR 1261, which reads in part

> The code "int i; to_string(i);" fails to compile, as 'int' is ambiguous between 'long long' and 'long long unsigned'. It seems unreasonable to expect users to cast numbers up to a larger type just to use to_string.

The proposed resolution is to add more overloads. GCC has implemented this already; I guess MSVC hasn't.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
Questionpighead10View Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - C++ildjarnView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - C++zwolView Answer on Stackoverflow