SQL Server 2008: The columns in table do not match an existing primary key or unique constraint

SqlSql ServerForeign KeysForeign Key-Relationship

Sql Problem Overview


I need to make some changes to a SQL Server 2008 database.

This requires the creation of a new table, and inserting a foreign key in the new table that references the Primary key of an already existing table. So I want to set up a relationship between my new tblTwo, which references the primary key of tblOne.

However when I tried to do this (through SQL Server Management Studio) I got the following error:

> The columns in table 'tblOne' do not > match an existing primary key or > UNIQUE constraint

I'm not really sure what this means, and I was wondering if there was any way around it?

Sql Solutions


Solution 1 - Sql

It means that the primary key in tblOne hasn't been properly declared - you need to go to tblOne and add the PRIMARY KEY constraint back onto it.

If you're sure that tblOne does have a PRIMARY KEY constraint, then maybe there are multiple tblOne tables in your DB, belonging to different schemas, and your references clause in your FK constraint is picking the wrong one.

If there's a composite key (which your comment would indicate), then you have to include both columns in your foreign key reference also. Note that a table can't have multiple primary keys - but if it has a composite key, you'll see a key symbol next to each column that is part of the primary key.

Solution 2 - Sql

If you have a composite key the order is important when creating a FK, and sometimes the order is not how it is displayed.

What I do is go to the Keys section of the table1 and select script primary key as create to clipboard and then create FK using the order as shown in script

Solution 3 - Sql

I've had this situation that led me to this topic. Same error but another cause. Maybe it will help someone.

Table1
ColA (PK)
ColB (PK)
ColC


Table2
ID (PK)
ColA
COLB

When trying to create foreign key in Table2 I've choose values from combobox in reverse order

Table1.ColB = Table2.ColB
Table1.ColA = Table2.ColA

This was throwing me an error like in topic name. Creating FK keeping order of columns in Primary key table as they are, made error disappear.

Stupid, but.. :)

Solution 4 - Sql

If you still get that error after you have followed all advice from the above answers and everything looks right.

One way to fix it is by Removing your Primary keys for both tables, Save, Refresh, and add them again. Then try to add your relationship again.

Solution 5 - Sql

This Error happened with me When I tried to add foreign key constraint starting from PrimaryKey Table

Simpy go to other table and and create this foreign key constraint from there (foreign key Table)

Solution 6 - Sql

This issue caught me out, I was adding the relationship on the wrong table. So if you're trying to add a relationship in table A to table B, try adding the relationship in table B to table A.

Solution 7 - Sql

That looks like you are trying to create a foreign key in tblTwo that does not match (or participate) with any primary key or unique index in tblOne.

Check this link on MSDN regarding it. Here you have another link with a practical case.

EDIT:

Answwering to your comment, I understand you mean there are 2 fields in the primary key (which makes it a composite). In SQL it is not possible to have 2 primary keys on the same table.

IMHO, a foreign key field should always refer to a single register in the referenced table (i.e. the whole primary key in your case). That means you need to put both fields of the tblOne primary key in tblTwo before creating the foreign key.

Anyway, I have investigated a bit over the Internet and it seems SQL Server 2008 (as some prior versions and other RDBMS) gives you the possibility to reference only part of the primary key as long as this part is a candidate key (Not Null and Unique) and you create an unique constraint on it.

I am not sure you can use that in your case, but check this link for more information on it.

Solution 8 - Sql

I have found that the column names must match.

Example: So if tblOne has id called categoryId a reference in tblTwo must also be called categoryId.

_tblname, primary key name, foreign key_
tblOne, "categoryId", none
tblTwo, "exampleId", "categoryId"

I noticed this when trying to create foreign key between 2 tables that both had the column name "id" as primary key.

Solution 9 - Sql

If nothing helps, then this could be the reason: Considering this case: Table A: Column 1 (Primary Key) Column 2 (Primary Key) Column 3 Column 4

Table B: Column a (Primary Key) Column b Column c

when you are defining a dependency B to A, then you are forced to respect the order in which the primaries are defined.

That's mean your dependency should look like this: Table A Table B Column 1 Column b Column 2 Column c

AND NOT: Table A Table B Column 2 Column c Column 1 Column b

then this will lead to the error you are encountering.

Solution 10 - Sql

I've found another way to get this error. This can also happen if you are trying to make a recursive foreign key (a foreign key to the primary key in the same table) in design view in SQL Management Studio. If you haven't yet saved the table with the primary key it will return this message. Simply save the table then it will allow you to create the foreign key.

Solution 11 - Sql

If you have data in your tables this could be the issue.

In my case I had some data in the Account table that I loaded at 3 pm, and some data in Contact table that I loaded at 3:10 pm, so Contact table had some values that weren't in my Account table yet.

I ended up deleting these values from the contact table and then managed to add a key without any problems.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
Question109221793View Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - SqlDamien_The_UnbelieverView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - SqlalanhView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - Sql100rView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - SqlRuanView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - SqlBasheer AL-MOMANIView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - SqlRichard PursehouseView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - SqlGuillem VicensView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - SqlPer GView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - SqlSamskyView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 10 - SqlCaimenView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 11 - SqlPete KozakView Answer on Stackoverflow