Spring ApplicationContext - Resource leak: 'context' is never closed

JavaEclipseSpringSpring Mvc

Java Problem Overview


In a spring MVC application, I initialize a variable in one of the service classes using the following approach:

ApplicationContext context = 
         new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("META-INF/userLibrary.xml");
service = context.getBean(UserLibrary.class);

The UserLibrary is a 3rd party utility which I am using in my application. The above code generates a warning for the 'context' variable. The warning is shown below:

Resource leak: 'context' is never closed

I don't understand the warning. As the application is a Spring MVC application, I can't really close/destroy the context as I refer to the service while the application is running. What exactly is the warning trying to tell me?

Java Solutions


Solution 1 - Java

Since the app context is a ResourceLoader (i.e. I/O operations) it consumes resources that need to be freed at some point. It is also an extension of AbstractApplicationContext which implements Closable. Thus, it's got a close() method and can be used in a try-with-resources statement.

try (ClassPathXmlApplicationContext context = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("META-INF/userLibrary.xml")) {
  service = context.getBean(UserLibrary.class);
}

Whether you actually need to create this context is a different question (you linked to it), I'm not gonna comment on that.

It's true that the context is closed implicitly when the application is stopped but that's not good enough. Eclipse is right, you need to take measures to close it manually for other cases in order to avoid classloader leaks.

Solution 2 - Java

close() is not defined in ApplicationContext interface.

The only way to get rid of the warning safely is the following

ClassPathXmlApplicationContext ctx = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext(...);
try {
    [...]
} finally {
    ctx.close();
}

Or, in Java 7

try(ClassPathXmlApplicationContext ctx = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext(...)) {
    [...]
}

The basic difference is that since you instantiate the context explicitly (i.e. by use of new) you know the class you are instantiating, so you can define your variable accordingly.

If you were not instantiating the AppContext (i.e. using the one provided by Spring) then you couldn't close it.

Solution 3 - Java

A simple cast solves the issue:

((ClassPathXmlApplicationContext) fac).close();

Solution 4 - Java

As the Application context has an instance of ClassPathXmlApplicationContext and the same has a close() method. I would simply CAST the appContext object and invoke the close() method as below.

ApplicationContext appContext = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("spring.xml");
//do some logic
((ClassPathXmlApplicationContext) appContext).close();

This will fix the Resource Leak warning.

Solution 5 - Java

try this. you need to apply cast to close applicationcontext.

   ClassPathXmlApplicationContext ctx = null;
      try {
         ctx = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext(...);
            [...]
             } finally {
              if (ctx != null)
                  ((AbstractApplicationContext) ctx).close();       
      }

Solution 6 - Java

Even I had the exact same warning, all I did was declare ApplicationContext outside the main function as private static and ta-da, problem fixed.

public class MainApp {
    private static ApplicationContext context;

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        context = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("Beans.xml");

        HelloWorld objA = (HelloWorld) context.getBean("helloWorld");

        objA.setMessage("I'm object A");
        objA.getMessage();

        HelloWorld objB = (HelloWorld) context.getBean("helloWorld");
        objB.getMessage();
    }
}

Solution 7 - Java

Downcast the context to ConfigurableApplicationContext.

((ConfigurableApplicationContext)context).close();

Solution 8 - Java

Casting is the correct resolution for this issue. I faced the same issue using the below line. ApplicationContext ctx = new AnnotationConfigApplicationContext(SpringConfig.class);

To resolve the warning just downcast the ctx object like below and then close it. ((AnnotationConfigApplicationContext) ctx).close();

Solution 9 - Java

Object obj = context.getBean("bean");
if(bean instanceof Bean) {
    Bean bean = (Bean) obj;
}

In my case leak disappears

Solution 10 - Java

This worked out best for me.

import org.springframework.context.ApplicationContext;
import org.springframework.context.support.ClassPathXmlApplicationContext;


public class Test {

     private static ApplicationContext con;

     public static void main(String[] args) {

         con = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("config.xml");

         Employee ob = (Employee) con.getBean("obj");
         System.out.println("Emp Id " + ob.getEmpno());
         System.out.println("Emp name " + ob.getEmpname());
    }
}

Solution 11 - Java

If you are using the ClassPathXmlApplicationContext then you can use

((ClassPathXmlApplicationContext) context).close();

to close the resource leak problem.

If you are using the AbstractApplicationContext then you can cast this with close method.

((AbstractApplicationContext) context).close();

It depends on the type of context using in the application.

Solution 12 - Java

import org.springframework.context.ConfigurableApplicationContext;

((ConfigurableApplicationContext)ctx).close();

Solution 13 - Java

You make the context a static variable, which means that the context is available to all the static methods in the class, and not limited to the scope of the main method anymore. So the tool can't assume that it should be closed at the end of the method anymore, so it doesn't issue the warning anymore.

public class MainApp {
	private static ApplicationContext context;
	public static void main(String[] args) {
	      context = 
	             new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("Beans.xml");

	      HelloWorld obj = (HelloWorld) context.getBean("helloWorld");

	      obj.getMessage();
	      
	   }
}

Solution 14 - Java

Yes, interface ApplicationContext doesn't have close() method, so I like to use class AbstractApplicationContext to use that close method explicitly and also here you can use your Spring Application configuration class using annotation instead of XML type.

AbstractApplicationContext context = new AnnotationConfigApplicationContext(SpringAppConfig.class);
Foo foo = context.getBean(Foo.class);

//do some work with foo

context.close();

your Resource leak: 'context' is never closed warning is gone now.

Solution 15 - Java

it has a simple solution just input the Core jar into the libraries, given at this link [download the core jar files for spring][1] [1]: https://static.javatpoint.com/src/sp/spcorejars.zip

Solution 16 - Java

for ApplicationContext you can't use close() method because this method doesn't define int it but instead you can use:(ClassPathXmlApplicationContext(context)).close()

Solution 17 - Java

The method close has been added to ConfigurableApplicationContext interface, so the best you can do to get access to it is:

ConfigurableApplicationContext context = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext(
                "/app-context.xml");

// Use the context...

context.close();

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionziggyView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - JavaMarcel StörView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - Javausr-local-ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - JavaRCIndView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - JavaAshutosh SrivastavView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - Javamadhu_karnatiView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - JavaElysiumView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - Javaamit28View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - JavaAadiView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - Javaлеонид павловView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 10 - Javai4nk1tView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 11 - JavaLaxman EdaraView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 12 - JavaYao PanView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 13 - JavaNanhe KumarView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 14 - JavaArifMustafaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 15 - Javashikhar kapoorView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 16 - JavaMehdi_mhView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 17 - JavaCarlos CurottoView Answer on Stackoverflow