Speed/cost of localStorage

JavascriptHtmlLocal Storage

Javascript Problem Overview


How fast is looking up a value in localStorage with Javascript?

Does anyone have links to any performance tests that indicate whether or not it is worth caching the data in a JavaScript object? Or does the browser already cache values that are accessed from localStorage anyway?

I am particularly interested in Firefox and Chrome implementations of localStorage.

Javascript Solutions


Solution 1 - Javascript

Just made a small benchmark. What i plan to do is to get some data from localStorage quite often and i wondered will it block. While localStorage.getItem is synced operation it may sound scary but is it?

  • 1st test to call 1 million times localStorage to get item which does exist.
  • 2nd test to call 1 million times localStorage to get item which does NOT exist.

Results:

> "Item found: 0.0007991071428571318ms per call"

> "Item not found: 0.0006365004639793477ms per call"

In short - just use it. It takes no time. 0.0007 of 1 millisecond.

https://jsbin.com/resuziqefa/edit?js,console

 let results = [];
 let sum = 0;
 localStorage.setItem('foo', 'foo bar baz foo bar baz foo bar baz foo');

 for (let i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {
   let a = performance.now();
   localStorage.getItem('foo');
   let result = performance.now() - a;
   sum += result;
   results.push(result);
 }

 console.log(`Item found: ${sum / results.length}ms per call`);

 results = [];
 sum = 0;
 for (let i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {
   let a = performance.now();
   localStorage.getItem('bar');
   let result = performance.now() - a;
   sum += result;
   results.push(result);
 }

 console.log(`Item not found: ${sum / results.length}ms per call`);

Solution 2 - Javascript

For what it's worth, here is a jsperf test.

The benchmark usage of localStorage is significantly slower than access of a regular object properties in both FF7 and IE9. Of course, this is just a micro-benchmark, and does not necessarily reflect real-world usage or performance...

Sample pulled from my FF 7 run to show what "significantly slower" means, in ops/second:

native     local-storage    notes
small set   374,397    13,657           10 distinct items
large set   2,256      68               100 distinct items
read-bias   10,266     342              1 write, 10 reads, 10 distinct items

Also, there are restrictions on what can be put in localStorage. YMMV.

Solution 3 - Javascript

Apples to apples

There is not much value in comparing localStorage to object storage, the two have different purposes in JavaScript. It is likely that you will only need to touch localStorage a few times in your app and the rest of the work will be done in memory.

Local Storage vs Cookies

A better comparison against localStorage would be that of its classic counterpart, document.cookie. Both localStorage and document.cookie's main purpose is to persist a value across browser refreshes.

I've put together an example on codsandbox.io

  • localStorage is two orders of magnitude faster than document.cookie.
  • Object storage is an order of magnitude faster than localStorage (irrelevant but added for reference).

localStorage is by far the fastest mechanism to persist values across a browser refresh.

localstoragevcookies

Note that I've precompiled cookie regex getters in order to make cookies as fast as possible and used the browser performance API for accurate measurements. All tests do a set of a unique key followed by a get of the same key.

Solution 4 - Javascript

I appreciate the efforts of the previous answers but found the benchmarks lacking. Here's a better micro-benchmark, do note, it's still a micro-benchmark. Always prefer measuring real performance bottlenecks to doing premature performance optimization.

Benchmarks are for reading and writing a single value, a list of a hundred objects, and a list of ten-thousand objects from and to localStorage.

TL;DR:

single read: 0.0004ms, write: 0.0114ms
small list read: 0.0325ms, write: 0.0498ms
large list read: 3.1787ms, write: 3.3190ms

Ran on a 3,1 GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i7. Chrome 79.

read local storage - single x 2,439,715 ops/sec ±0.91% (62 runs sampled)
read local storage - small x 30,742 ops/sec ±0.78% (62 runs sampled)
read local storage - large x 315 ops/sec ±1.30% (60 runs sampled)
write local storage - single x 88,032 ops/sec ±4.25% (33 runs sampled)
write local storage - small x 20,079 ops/sec ±1.89% (59 runs sampled)
write local storage - large x 301 ops/sec ±1.09% (60 runs sampled)

Test: read local storage - single
mean: 0.0004098839352502669ms
margin of error: ±0.000003731514453196282ms
devation: ±0.00001499080315635531ms

Test: read local storage - small
mean: 0.03252840093744983ms
margin of error: ±0.0002551322114660716ms
devation: ±0.001024955633672395ms

Test: read local storage - large
mean: 3.1786666666666674ms
margin of error: ±0.041479799689699ms
devation: ±0.16392915653288143ms

Test: write local storage - single
mean: 0.011359496605398242ms
margin of error: ±0.00048286808926899016ms
devation: ±0.0014152377493978731ms

Test: write local storage - small
mean: 0.04980309857651518ms
margin of error: ±0.0009408982120607311ms
devation: ±0.0036873348473201325ms

Test: write local storage - large
mean: 3.31899154589372ms
margin of error: ±0.03605551145015122ms
devation: ±0.14249224018921072ms

Here's a snippet to run it yourself if you wish.

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/[email protected]/lodash.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/benchmark/2.1.4/benchmark.min.js"></script>
<script>
  const suite = new Benchmark.Suite();

  const genNum = () => Math.floor(Math.random() * 1000000);

  const genObj = () => ({
    target: String(genNum()),
    swap: String(genNum()),
    price: genNum()
  });

  const printStats = test =>
    console.log(
      `Test: ${test.name}
mean: ${test.stats.mean * 1000}ms
margin of error: ±${test.stats.moe * 1000}ms
devation: ±${test.stats.deviation * 1000}ms`
    );

  const singleNum = String(genNum());
  const smallList = _.range(100).map(genObj);
  const largeList = _.range(10000).map(genObj);

  const singleKey = "single-key";
  const smallKey = "small-key";
  const largeKey = "large-key";

  localStorage.setItem(singleKey, singleNum);
  localStorage.setItem(smallKey, JSON.stringify(smallList));
  localStorage.setItem(largeKey, JSON.stringify(largeList));

  suite
    .add("read local storage - single", function() {
      const readData = localStorage.getItem(singleKey);
    })
    .add("read local storage - small", function() {
      const readData = JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem(smallKey));
    })
    .add("read local storage - large", function() {
      const readData = JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem(largeKey));
    })
    .add("write local storage - single", function() {
      localStorage.setItem("single_write_key", singleNum);
    })
    .add("write local storage - small", function() {
      localStorage.setItem("small_write_key", JSON.stringify(smallList));
    })
    .add("write local storage - large", function() {
      localStorage.setItem("large_write_key", JSON.stringify(largeList));
    })
    .on("cycle", function(event) {
      console.log(String(event.target));
    })
    .on("complete", function() {
      this.forEach(printStats);
    })
    .run({ async: true });
</script>

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionMikeView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - JavascriptLukas LiesisView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - Javascriptuser166390View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - JavascriptcchamberlainView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - JavascriptalextesView Answer on Stackoverflow