Skip callbacks on Factory Girl and Rspec

Ruby on-RailsRspecFactory Bot

Ruby on-Rails Problem Overview


I'm testing a model with an after create callback that I'd like to run only on some occasions while testing. How can I skip/run callbacks from a factory?

class User < ActiveRecord::Base
  after_create :run_something
  ...
end

Factory:

FactoryGirl.define do
  factory :user do
    first_name "Luiz"
    last_name "Branco"
    ...
    # skip callback

    factory :with_run_something do
      # run callback
  end
end

Ruby on-Rails Solutions


Solution 1 - Ruby on-Rails

I'm not sure if it is the best solution, but I have successfully achieved this using:

FactoryGirl.define do
  factory :user do
    first_name "Luiz"
    last_name "Branco"
    #...

    after(:build) { |user| user.class.skip_callback(:create, :after, :run_something) }

    factory :user_with_run_something do
      after(:create) { |user| user.send(:run_something) }
    end
  end
end

Running without callback:

FactoryGirl.create(:user)

Running with callback:

FactoryGirl.create(:user_with_run_something)

Solution 2 - Ruby on-Rails

When you don't want to run a callback do the following:

User.skip_callback(:create, :after, :run_something)
Factory.create(:user)

Be aware that skip_callback will be persistant across other specs after it is run therefore consider something like the following:

before do
  User.skip_callback(:create, :after, :run_something)
end

after do
  User.set_callback(:create, :after, :run_something)
end

Solution 3 - Ruby on-Rails

None of these solutions are good. They deface the class by removing functionality that should be removed from the instance, not from the class.

factory :user do
  before(:create){|user| user.define_singleton_method(:send_welcome_email){}}

Instead of suppressing the callback, I am suppressing the functionality of the callback. In a way, I like this approach better because it is more explicit.

Solution 4 - Ruby on-Rails

I'd like to make an improvement to @luizbranco 's answer to make after_save callback more reusable when creating other users.

FactoryGirl.define do
  factory :user do
    first_name "Luiz"
    last_name "Branco"
    #...

    after(:build) { |user| 
      user.class.skip_callback(:create, 
                               :after, 
                               :run_something1,
                               :run_something2) 
    }

    trait :with_after_save_callback do
      after(:build) { |user| 
        user.class.set_callback(:create, 
                                :after, 
                                :run_something1,
                                :run_something2) 
      }
    end
  end
end

Running without after_save callback:

FactoryGirl.create(:user)

Running with after_save callback:

FactoryGirl.create(:user, :with_after_save_callback)

In my test, I prefer to create users without the callback by default because the methods used run extra stuff I don't normally want in my test examples.

----------UPDATE------------ I stopped using skip_callback because there were some inconsistency issues in the test suite.

Alternative Solution 1 (use of stub and unstub):

after(:build) { |user| 
  user.class.any_instance.stub(:run_something1)
  user.class.any_instance.stub(:run_something2)
}

trait :with_after_save_callback do
  after(:build) { |user| 
    user.class.any_instance.unstub(:run_something1)
    user.class.any_instance.unstub(:run_something2)
  }
end

Alternative Solution 2 (my preferred approach):

after(:build) { |user| 
  class << user
    def run_something1; true; end
    def run_something2; true; end
  end
}

trait :with_after_save_callback do
  after(:build) { |user| 
    class << user
      def run_something1; super; end
      def run_something2; super; end
    end
  }
end

Solution 5 - Ruby on-Rails

Rails 5 - skip_callback raising Argument error when skipping from a FactoryBot factory.

ArgumentError: After commit callback :whatever_callback has not been defined

There was a change in Rails 5 with how skip_callback handles unrecognized callbacks:

> ActiveSupport::Callbacks#skip_callback now raises an ArgumentError if an unrecognized callback is remove

When skip_callback is called from the factory, the real callback in the AR model is not yet defined.

If you've tried everything and pulled your hair out like me, here is your solution (got it from searching FactoryBot issues) (NOTE the raise: false part):

after(:build) { YourSweetModel.skip_callback(:commit, :after, :whatever_callback, raise: false) }

Feel free to use it with whatever other strategies you prefer.

Solution 6 - Ruby on-Rails

This solution works for me and you don´t have to add an additional block to your Factory definition:

user = FactoryGirl.build(:user)
user.send(:create_without_callbacks) # Skip callback

user = FactoryGirl.create(:user)     # Execute callbacks

Solution 7 - Ruby on-Rails

A simple stub worked best for me in Rspec 3

allow_any_instance_of(User).to receive_messages(:run_something => nil)

Solution 8 - Ruby on-Rails

FactoryGirl.define do
  factory :order, class: Spree::Order do

    trait :without_callbacks do
      after(:build) do |order|
        order.class.skip_callback :save, :before, :update_status!
      end

      after(:create) do |order|
        order.class.set_callback :save, :before, :update_status!
      end
    end
  end
end

Important note you should specify both of them. If only use before and run multiple specs, it'll try to disable callback multiple times. It'll succeed the first time, but on the second, callback isn't going to be defined anymore. So it'll error out

Solution 9 - Ruby on-Rails

Calling skip_callback from my factory proved problematic for me.

In my case, I have a document class with some s3-related callbacks in before and after create that I only want to run when testing the full stack is necessary. Otherwise, I want to skip those s3 callbacks.

When I tried skip_callbacks in my factory, it persisted that callback skip even when I created a document object directly, without using a factory. So instead, I used mocha stubs in the after build call and everything is working perfectly:

factory :document do
  upload_file_name "file.txt"
  upload_content_type "text/plain"
  upload_file_size 1.kilobyte
  after(:build) do |document|
    document.stubs(:name_of_before_create_method).returns(true)
    document.stubs(:name_of_after_create_method).returns(true)
  end
end

Solution 10 - Ruby on-Rails

This will work with current rspec syntax (as of this post) and is much cleaner:

before do
   User.any_instance.stub :run_something
end

Solution 11 - Ruby on-Rails

James Chevalier's answer about how to skip before_validation callback didn't help me so if you straggle the same as me here is working solution:

in model:

before_validation :run_something, on: :create

in factory:

after(:build) { |obj| obj.class.skip_callback(:validation, :before, :run_something) }

Solution 12 - Ruby on-Rails

This is an older question, with some good answers, but none of them quite worked for me for a few reasons

  • didn't like the idea of modifying the behavior of some class at runtime
  • didn't want to use attr_accessor all throughout my classes because it seemed weird to put logic only used for tests inside models
  • didn't want to put a call to rspec before/after blocks on various specs to stub/unstub behavior

using FactoryBot you can use transient in your factory to set a switch to modify behavior of your classes. As a result, factories/specs look like

#factory
FactoryBot.define do
  factory :user do
    
    transient do
      skip_after_callbacks { true }
    end

    after(:build) do |user, evaluator|
      if evaluator.skip_after_callbacks
        class << user
          def callback_method1; true; end
          def callback_method2; true; end
          def callback_method3; true; end
        end
      end
    end
  end
end

# without running callbacks
user = create(:user)
# with running callbacks for certain specs
user = create(:user, skip_after_callbacks: false)

This worked for me because our app has certain methods that are triggered as a result of various after_create/after_commit callbacks that run to external services, so by default I don't typically need those to run in specs. Doing this saved our test suite on various calls using VCR. YMMV

Solution 13 - Ruby on-Rails

In my case I have the callback loading something to my redis cache. But then I did not have/want a redis instance running for my test environment.

after_create :load_to_cache

def load_to_cache
  Redis.load_to_cache
end

For my situation, similar to above, I just stubbed my load_to_cache method in my spec_helper, with:

Redis.stub(:load_to_cache)

Also, in certain situation where I want to the test this, I just have to unstub them in the before block of the corresponding Rspec test cases.

I know you might have something more complicated happening in your after_create or might not find this very elegant. You can try to cancel the callback defined in your model, by defining an after_create hook in your Factory (refer to factory_girl docs), where you can probably define a the same callback and return false, according to the 'Canceling callbacks' section of this article. (I am unsure about order in which callback are executed, which is why I didn't go for this option).

Lastly, (sorry I am not able to find the article) Ruby allows you to use some dirty meta programming to unhook a callback hook (you will have to reset it). I guess this would be the least preferred option.

Well there is one more thing, not really a solution, but see if you can get away with Factory.build in your specs, instead of actually creating the object. (Would be the simplest if you can).

Solution 14 - Ruby on-Rails

I found the following solution to be a cleaner way since the callback is run/set at a class level.

# create(:user) - will skip the callback.
# create(:user, skip_create_callback: false) - will set the callback
FactoryBot.define do
  factory :user do
    first_name "Luiz"
    last_name "Branco"

    transient do
      skip_create_callback true
    end

    after(:build) do |user, evaluator|
      if evaluator.skip_create_callback
        user.class.skip_callback(:create, :after, :run_something)
      else
        user.class.set_callback(:create, :after, :run_something)
      end
    end
  end
end

Solution 15 - Ruby on-Rails

Regarding the answer posted above, https://stackoverflow.com/a/35562805/2001785, you do not need to add the code to the factory. I found it easier to overload the methods in the specs themselves. For example, instead of (in conjunction with the factory code in the cited post)

let(:user) { FactoryGirl.create(:user) }

I like using (without the cited factory code)

let(:user) do
  FactoryGirl.build(:user).tap do |u|
      u.define_singleton_method(:send_welcome_email){}
      u.save!
    end
  end
end

This way you do not need to look at both the factory and the test files to understand the behavior of the test.

Solution 16 - Ruby on-Rails

Here's a snippet I created to handle this in a generic way.
It will skip every callback configured, including rails-related callbacks like before_save_collection_association, but it won't skip some needed to make ActiveRecord work ok, like autogenerated autosave_associated_records_for_ callbacks.

# In some factories/generic_traits.rb file or something like that
FactoryBot.define do
  trait :skip_all_callbacks do
    transient do
      force_callbacks { [] }
    end

    after(:build) do |instance, evaluator|
      klass = instance.class
      # I think with these callback types should be enough, but for a full
      # list, check `ActiveRecord::Callbacks::CALLBACKS`
      %i[commit create destroy save touch update].each do |type|
        callbacks = klass.send("_#{type}_callbacks")
        next if callbacks.empty?

        callbacks.each do |cb|
          # Autogenerated ActiveRecord after_create/after_update callbacks like
          # `autosave_associated_records_for_xxxx` won't be skipped, also
          # before_destroy callbacks with a number like 70351699301300 (maybe
          # an Object ID?, no idea)
          next if cb.filter.to_s =~ /(autosave_associated|\d+)/

          cb_name = "#{klass}.#{cb.kind}_#{type}(:#{cb.filter})"
          if evaluator.force_callbacks.include?(cb.filter)
            next Rails.logger.debug "Forcing #{cb_name} callback"
          end

          Rails.logger.debug "Skipping #{cb_name} callback"
          instance.define_singleton_method(cb.filter) {}
        end
      end
    end
  end
end

then later:

create(:user, :skip_all_callbacks)

Needless to say, YMMV, so take a look in the test logs what are you really skipping. Maybe you have a gem adding a callback you really need and it will make your tests to fail miserably or from your 100 callbacks fat model you just need a couple for a specific test. For those cases, try the transient :force_callbacks

create(:user, :skip_all_callbacks, force_callbacks: [:some_important_callback])

BONUS

Sometimes you need also skip validations (all in a effort to make tests faster), then try with:

  trait :skip_validate do
    to_create { |instance| instance.save(validate: false) }
  end

Solution 17 - Ruby on-Rails

FactoryGirl.define do
 factory :user do
   first_name "Luiz"
   last_name "Branco"
   #...

after(:build) { |user| user.class.skip_callback(:create, :after, :run_something) }

trait :user_with_run_something do
  after(:create) { |user| user.class.set_callback(:create, :after, :run_something) }
  end
 end
end

You could just set the callback with a trait for those instances when you want run it.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionluizbrancoView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - Ruby on-RailsluizbrancoView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - Ruby on-RailsMinimulView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - Ruby on-RailsB SevenView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - Ruby on-RailskonyakView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - Ruby on-RailsRudyOnRailsView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - Ruby on-RailsauralbeeView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - Ruby on-RailssamgView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - Ruby on-RailsAndreiMotingaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - Ruby on-RailsuberllamaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 10 - Ruby on-RailsZyrenView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 11 - Ruby on-RailsTetiana ChuprynaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 12 - Ruby on-RailsJames NView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 13 - Ruby on-RailsjakeView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 14 - Ruby on-RailsSairamView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 15 - Ruby on-RailsbhfailorView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 16 - Ruby on-RailsAlter LagosView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 17 - Ruby on-Railsuser6520080View Answer on Stackoverflow