Ruby: What does the comment "frozen_string_literal: true" do?

Ruby

Ruby Problem Overview


This is the rspec binstub in my project directory.

#!/usr/bin/env ruby
begin
  load File.expand_path("../spring", __FILE__)
rescue LoadError
end
# frozen_string_literal: true
#
# This file was generated by Bundler.
#
# The application 'rspec' is installed as part of a gem, and
# this file is here to facilitate running it.
#

require "pathname"
ENV["BUNDLE_GEMFILE"] ||= File.expand_path("../../Gemfile",
  Pathname.new(__FILE__).realpath)

require "rubygems"
require "bundler/setup"

load Gem.bin_path("rspec-core", "rspec")

What is this intended to do?

# frozen_string_literal: true

Ruby Solutions


Solution 1 - Ruby

# frozen_string_literal: true is a magic comment, supported for the first time in Ruby 2.3, that tells Ruby that all string literals in the file are implicitly frozen, as if #freeze had been called on each of them. That is, if a string literal is defined in a file with this comment, and you call a method on that string which modifies it, such as <<, you'll get RuntimeError: can't modify frozen String.

The comment must be on the first line of the file.

In Ruby 2.3, you can use this magic comment to prepare for frozen string literals being the default in Ruby 3.

In Ruby 2.3 run with the --enable=frozen-string-literal flag, and in Ruby 3, string literals are frozen in all files. You can override the global setting with # frozen_string_literal: false.

If you want a string literal to be mutable regardless of the global or per-file setting, you can prefix it with the unary + operator (being careful with operator precedence) or call .dup on it:

# frozen_string_literal: true
"".frozen?
=> true
(+"").frozen?
=> false
"".dup.frozen?
=> false

You can also freeze a mutable (unfrozen) string with unary -.

Solution 2 - Ruby

It improves application performance by not allocating new space for the same string, thereby also saving time for garbage collection chores. How? when you freeze a string literal(string object), you're telling Ruby to not let any of your programs modify the string literal (object).

Some obvious observations to keep in mind.

1. By freezing string literals, you're not allocating new memory space for it.

Example:

Without magic comment allocates new space for the same string (Observe the different object IDs printed)

def hello_id
  a = 'hello'
  a.object_id
end

puts hello_id   #=> 70244568358640
puts hello_id   #=> 70244568358500

With magic comment, ruby allocates space only once

# frozen_string_literal: true

def hello_id
  a = 'hello'
  a.object_id
end

puts hello_id   #=> 70244568358640
puts hello_id   #=> 70244568358640


2. By freezing string literals, your program will raise an exception when trying to modify the string literal.

Example:

Without magic comment, you can modify the string literals.

name = 'Johny'
name << ' Cash'

puts name     #=> Johny Cash

With magic comment, an exception will be raised when you modify string literals

# frozen_string_literal: true

name = 'john'
name << ' cash'  #=> `<main>': can't modify frozen String (FrozenError)

puts name      

There's always more to learn and be flexible:

Solution 3 - Ruby

In Ruby 3.0. Matz (Ruby’s creator) decided to make all String literals frozen by default.

EDIT 2019: he decided to abandon the idea of making frozen-string-literals default for Ruby 3.0 (source: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11473#note-53)


You can use in Ruby 2.x. Just add this comment in the first line of your files.

# frozen_string_literal: true

> The above comment at top of a file changes semantics of static string > literals in the file. The static string literals will be frozen and > always returns same object. (The semantics of dynamic string literals > is not changed.) > > This way has following benefits: > > No ugly f-suffix. > No syntax error on older Ruby. > We need only a line > for each file.

Plese, read this topic for more information.

https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8976

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionmessanjahView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - RubyDave SchweisguthView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - RubyTenzin ChemiView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - RubyAlexShView Answer on Stackoverflow