Resolving LNK4098: defaultlib 'MSVCRT' conflicts with

Visual StudioDllLinkerWarningsMsvcrt

Visual Studio Problem Overview


This warning:

LINK : warning LNK4098: defaultlib 'MSVCRT' conflicts
  with use of other libs; use /NODEFAULTLIB:library

is a fairly common warning in Visual Studio. I'd like to understand the exact reason for it and the right way (if at all) to handle it.

This comes up in a debug build, compiled with /MDd. The project is linked to things like windows Version.dll and pdh.dll which themselves link with MSVCRT.dll. Obviously, I don't have the debug versions of these and can't compile them.

So I added /NODEFAULTLIB:MSVCRT to the linker command line and it actually did remove the warning. But what does this actually do? And why is it necessary?

Visual Studio Solutions


Solution 1 - Visual Studio

There are 4 versions of the CRT link libraries present in vc\lib:

  • libcmt.lib: static CRT link library for a release build (/MT)
  • libcmtd.lib: static CRT link library for a debug build (/MTd)
  • msvcrt.lib: import library for the release DLL version of the CRT (/MD)
  • msvcrtd.lib: import library for the debug DLL version of the CRT (/MDd)

Look at the linker options, Project + Properties, Linker, Command Line. Note how these libraries are not mentioned here. The linker automatically figures out what /M switch was used by the compiler and which .lib should be linked through a #pragma comment directive. Kinda important, you'd get horrible link errors and hard to diagnose runtime errors if there was a mismatch between the /M option and the .lib you link with.

You'll see the error message you quoted when the linker is told both to link to msvcrt.lib and libcmt.lib. Which will happen if you link code that was compiled with /MT with code that was linked with /MD. There can be only one version of the CRT.

/NODEFAULTLIB tells the linker to ignore the #pragma comment directive that was generated from the /MT compiled code. This might work, although a slew of other linker errors is not uncommon. Things like errno, which is a extern int in the static CRT version but macro-ed to a function in the DLL version. Many others like that.

Well, fix this problem the Right Way, find the .obj or .lib file that you are linking that was compiled with the wrong /M option. If you have no clue then you could find it by grepping the .obj/.lib files for "/MT"

Btw: the Windows executables (like version.dll) have their own CRT version to get their job done. It is located in c:\windows\system32, you cannot reliably use it for your own programs, its CRT headers are not available anywhere. The CRT DLL used by your program has a different name (like msvcrt90.dll).

Solution 2 - Visual Studio

It means that one of the dependent dlls is compiled with a different run-time library.

Project -> Properties -> C/C++ -> Code Generation -> Runtime Library

Go over all the libraries and see that they are compiled in the same way.

More about this error in this link:

warning LNK4098: defaultlib "LIBCD" conflicts with use of other libs

Solution 3 - Visual Studio

IMO this link from Yochai Timmer was very good and relevant but painful to read. I wrote a summary.

Yochai, if you ever read this, please see the note at the end.


For the original post read : warning LNK4098: defaultlib "LIBCD" conflicts with use of other libs

Error

> LINK : warning LNK4098: defaultlib "LIBCD" conflicts with use of other libs; use /NODEFAULTLIB:library

Meaning

> one part of the system was compiled to use a single threaded standard (libc) library with debug information (libcd) which is statically linked > > while another part of the system was compiled to use a multi-threaded standard library without debug information which resides in a DLL and uses dynamic linking

How to resolve

> - Ignore the warning, after all it is only a warning. However, your program now contains multiple instances of the same functions. > > - Use the linker option /NODEFAULTLIB:lib. This is not a complete solution, even if you can get your program to link this way you are ignoring a warning sign: the code has been compiled for different environments, some of your code may be compiled for a single threaded model while other code is multi-threaded. > > - [...] trawl through all your libraries and ensure they have the correct link settings

In the latter, as it in mentioned in the original post, two common problems can arise :

> - You have a third party library which is linked differently to your application. > > - You have other directives embedded in your code: normally this is the MFC. If any modules in your system link against MFC all your modules must nominally link against the same version of MFC.

For those cases, ensure you understand the problem and decide among the solutions.


Note : I wanted to include that summary of Yochai Timmer's link into his own answer but since some people have trouble to review edits properly I had to write it in a separate answer. Sorry

Solution 4 - Visual Studio

I get this every time I want to create an application in VC++.

Right-click the project, select Properties then under 'Configuration properties | C/C++ | Code Generation', select "Multi-threaded Debug (/MTd)" for Debug configuration.

Note that this does not change the setting for your Release configuration - you'll need to go to the same location and select "Multi-threaded (/MT)" for Release.

Solution 5 - Visual Studio

Right-click the project, select Properties then under 'Configuration properties | Linker | Input | Ignore specific Library and write msvcrtd.lib

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionshooshView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - Visual StudioHans PassantView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - Visual StudioYochai TimmerView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - Visual StudioForceMagicView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - Visual Studiouser1016736View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - Visual StudioraeheeView Answer on Stackoverflow