It took a few minutes of hunting. Click on the icon in the task bar:

[![enter image description here][1]][1]


  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/TH9lr.png

Due to the reactions from this post, [JetBrains fixed this &#39;feature&#39;][2] and now allows the user to configure this in the ReSharper settings: `Tools &gt; Unit Testing &gt; Unit Test Output &gt; Limit number of lines in output to xxx`. This fix has been made available in ReSharper 2016.2.

[![How to configure ReSharper to not limit the number of lines in the output to 200 but a greater number][1]][1]

  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/4Ht8m.png
[2]:https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/RSRP-459038

I am using a custom ProgressBar. Now while a task is going on, I am showing the progress bar, but user can still interact with the views and controls. 
How do I disable the user interaction on whole view just like a ProgressDialog does , when it is visible.

Do I need to use a transparent view on top of main view and show the progress bar on that view and hide that view once a task is completed. 

Or just get the id of my parentView and set it disabled ? But then I won&#39;t be able to dim the background, just like what happens when a dialog appears on the view/Activity/Fragment. Right? 

I just want to know the way to disallow the user from any interaction while the progressbar is visible.

Thanks

How to disable user interaction while ProgressBar is visible in android?

When i try to install php5 in Ubuntu 16.04 by using following code:

    sudo apt-get install php5 php5-mcrypt

I get following error:

    Reading package lists... Done
    Building dependency tree       
    Reading state information... Done
    Package php5 is not available, but is referred to by another package.
    This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
    is only available from another source
    
    E: Package &#39;php5&#39; has no installation candidate
I have tried reinstalling but it does not help. 

All this error was encountered after I updated my 15.10 Ubuntu to 16.04




Package php5 have no installation candidate (Ubuntu 16.04)

When running unit tests in ReSharper, if the output is too long, it gives this error:

    The output has reached the limit and was truncated.
    To view the full output use &#39;Show Stack Trace in a new window&#39; action.

## Update

ReSharper fixed this issue in 2016.2, see answer from @Alexander Pacha. 


ReSharper Error: &quot;The output has reached the limit and was truncated. To view the full output use &#39;Show Stack Trace in a new window&#39; action.&quot;

When running unit tests in ReSharper, if the output is too long, it gives this error:
<pre><code class="hljs language-lua">The output has reached the limit and was truncated.
To view the full output use 'Show Stack Trace in a new window' action.
</code></pre>
<h4 id="update"><a aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1" href="#update"></a>Update</h4>
ReSharper fixed this issue in 2016.2, see answer from @Alexander Pacha.

I&#39;m currently confuse on how to mock.

I&#39;m using Moq. To mock objects I usually write this way

     var mockIRepo = new Mock&lt;IRepo&gt;();

However, I need to create mock object for my setup.

**Option1**
Is it better to mock my object which only contain properties this way?

     var object = Mock.Of&lt;Object&gt;()

**Option2**
Or this way

     var object = new Mock&lt;Object&gt;()

I&#39;ve read that option 2 has setupproperties which is kinda questionable to me because I could also set the properties in option 1. 

***Then what is the difference? Or is there a better way?***

Mock.Of&lt;Object&gt; VS Mock&lt;Object&gt;()

Hi I&#39;ve been using moq for a while when I see this code.

I have to setup a return in one of my repo.

     mockIRole.Setup(r =&gt; r.GetSomething(It.IsAny&lt;Guid&gt;(), It.IsAny&lt;Guid&gt;(), 
                      It.IsAny&lt;Guid&gt;())).Returns(ReturnSomething);

I have three parameters and I just saw these in one of articles or blog on the net.

What is the use of `It.Is&lt;&gt;` or `It.IsAny&lt;&gt;` for an object? if I could use `Guid.NewGuid()` or other types then why use `It.Is`?

I&#39;m sorry I&#39;m not sure if my question is right or am I missing some knowledge in testing.
But it seems like there is nothing wrong either way.

Why use It.is&lt;&gt; or It.IsAny&lt;&gt; if I could just define a variable?

I&#39;m confused about how to access `&lt;input&gt;` value when using `mount`. Here&#39;s what I&#39;ve got as my test:

      it(&#39;cancels changes when user presses esc&#39;, done =&gt; {
        const wrapper = mount(&lt;EditableText defaultValue=&quot;Hello&quot; /&gt;);
        const input = wrapper.find(&#39;input&#39;);
    
        console.log(input.render().attr(&#39;value&#39;));
        input.simulate(&#39;focus&#39;);
        done();
      });

The console prints out `undefined`. But if I slightly modify the code, it works:

      it(&#39;cancels changes when user presses esc&#39;, done =&gt; {
        const wrapper = render(&lt;EditableText defaultValue=&quot;Hello&quot; /&gt;);
        const input = wrapper.find(&#39;input&#39;);
    
        console.log(input.val());
        input.simulate(&#39;focus&#39;);
        done();
      });

Except, of course, the `input.simulate` line fails since I&#39;m using `render` now. I need both to work properly. How do I fix this?

**EDIT**:

I should mention, `&lt;EditableText /&gt;` is not a controlled component. But when I pass `defaultValue` into `&lt;input /&gt;`, it seems to set the value. The second code block above does print out the value, and likewise if I inspect the input element in Chrome and type `$0.value` in the console, it shows the expected value.

Enzyme - How to access and set &lt;input&gt; value?

I have been trying to run unit tests using [pytest][1] in Python. I had written a module with one class and some methods inside that class. I wrote a unit test for this module (with a simple assert statement to check equality of lists) where I first instantiate the class with a list. Then I invoke a method on that object (from the class). Both `test.py` and the script to be tested are in the same folder. When I run `pytest` on it, I get &quot;collected 0 items&quot;.

I am new to `pytest`, and but I am unable to run their examples successfully. What am I missing here?

I am running Python version 3.5.1 and pytest version 2.8.1 on Windows 7.

My *test.py* code:

    from sort_algos import Sorts

    def integer_sort_test():
        myobject1 = Sorts([-100, 10, -10])
        assert myobject1.merge_sort() == [-101, -100, 10]

sort_algos.py is a module containing class `Sorts`. *merge_sort* is a method under `Sorts`.

  [1]: https://docs.pytest.org/en/stable/




&#39;pytest&#39; exits with no error, but with &quot;collected 0 items&quot;

I&#39;m trying to test a class but I&#39;m kind of confused as to what to test. Here is the class I want to unit test:

    class CalculatorBrain {
    
        private var accumulator = 0.0
    
        func setOperand(operand: Double) {
            accumulator = operand
        }
    
        var result: Double {
            return accumulator
        }
    
        private var operations: Dictionary&lt;String, Operation&gt; = [
            &quot;=&quot; : .Equals,
        
            &quot;π&quot; : .Constant(M_PI),
            &quot;e&quot; : .Constant(M_E),
        
            &quot;&#177;&quot; : .UnaryOperation({ (op1: Double) -&gt; Double in return -op1 }),
            &quot;√&quot; : .UnaryOperation(sqrt ),
            &quot;cos&quot;: .UnaryOperation(cos),
        
            &quot;+&quot; : .BinaryOperation({ (op1: Double, op2: Double) -&gt; Double in return op1 + op2 }),
            &quot;−&quot; : .BinaryOperation({ (op1: Double, op2: Double) -&gt; Double in return op1 - op2 }),
            &quot;&#215;&quot; : .BinaryOperation({ (op1: Double, op2: Double) -&gt; Double in return op1 * op2 }),
            &quot;&#247;&quot; : .BinaryOperation({ (op1: Double, op2: Double) -&gt; Double in return op1 / op2 })
        ]
    
        private enum Operation {
            case Constant(Double)
            case UnaryOperation((Double) -&gt; Double)
            case BinaryOperation((Double, Double) -&gt; Double)
            case Equals
        }
    
        func performOperation(symbol: String) {
            if let operation = operations[symbol] {
                switch operation {
                case .Constant(let value):
                    accumulator = value
                case .UnaryOperation(let function):
                    accumulator = function(accumulator)
                case .BinaryOperation(let function):
                    executePendingBinaryOperation()
                    pendingBinaryOperation = PendingBinaryOperationInfo(binaryOperation: function, firstOperand: accumulator)
                case .Equals:
                    executePendingBinaryOperation()
                }
            }
        }
    
        private var pendingBinaryOperation: PendingBinaryOperationInfo?

        private struct PendingBinaryOperationInfo {
            var binaryOperation: (Double, Double) -&gt; Double
            var firstOperand: Double
        }
    
        private func executePendingBinaryOperation() {
            if let pending = pendingBinaryOperation {
                accumulator = pending.binaryOperation(pending.firstOperand, accumulator)
                pendingBinaryOperation = nil
            }
        }
    }

For the code above, what would be good tests. 

Is it worth testing every single operation (+, -, *, /, etc) in the dictionary `operations`?

Is it worth testing the private methods?

Swift - Unit testing private variables and methods

I&#39;m a bit stuck with this code (this is a sample):
   

    public async Task Fail()
    {
        await Task.Run(() =&gt; { throw new Exception(); });
    }

    [Test]
    public async Task TestFail()
    {
        Action a = async () =&gt; { await Fail(); };
        a.ShouldThrow&lt;Exception&gt;();
    }

The code doesn&#39;t catch the exception, and fails with
&gt; Expected a System.Exception to be thrown, but no exception was
&gt; thrown.



I&#39;m sure I&#39;m missing something, but docs seem to suggest this is the way to go. Some help would be appreciated.

Testing for exceptions in async methods

I&#39;ve just installed Visual Studio 2017. I have a project using NUnit for the test cases. &lt;kbd&gt;Ctrl&lt;/kbd&gt; + &lt;kbd&gt;R&lt;/kbd&gt; - &lt;kbd&gt;T&lt;/kbd&gt; no longer runs the tests, and the Test Explorer no longer finds any test cases marked with the TestCase attribute.

Is there a way to get NUnit running yet, or an update I could find?

I reinstalled NUnit from the NuGet Package Manager to the latest version with no improvement.


How can I run NUnit tests in Visual Studio 2017?

Everthing below is made in VS2019, using .NET Framework 4.7 and NUnit + NUnit3TestAdapter

I created an assembly called Exitus.Tests, and added a few unit tests. However, do to some issues with Nuget, that I could not solve, I made another project called Exitus.UnitTests and removed the once file I had in the old project (including changing the namespace). 

Now the new test project showed op correctly in the explorer, but a &quot;ghost&quot; of the old project remained:

[![Visual Studio test explorer][1]][1]

If I try to run the test, the output window shows the following error:

&gt; System.InvalidOperationException: The following TestContainer was not found &#39;C:\Users\xxx\Source\Repositories\Expire\Exitus.Tests\bin\Debug\Exitus.Tests.dll&#39;
   at Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestWindow.Client.TestContainer.TestContainerProvider.&lt;GetTestContainerAsync&gt;d__46.MoveNext()
--- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown ---
   at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.ThrowForNonSuccess(Task task)
   at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.HandleNonSuccessAndDebuggerNotification(Task task)
   at Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestWindow.Controller.TestContainerConfigurationQueryByTestsBase.&lt;QueryTestContainerConfigurationsAsync&gt;d__6.MoveNext()
   (...)

The stack trace is a lot longer, but the curious thing is the second line, stating that it could not find the test container at `\Exitus.Tests\bin\Debug\Exitus.Tests.dll`. This is the name of the old test project, which I removed and deleted. I have searched my entire project for the term `Exitus.Tests` and it returns no results. 

Is there anyway to forcefully remove this &#39;ghost&#39; project? 


  [1]: https://i.stack.imgur.com/ntW1F.png

Test Explorer (VS) shows &#39;&lt;Unknown project&gt;&#39;

I&#39;ve met with a strange problem. I had 7 projects in the solution. I had to add another MVC project. Now when the document (from the new project) is opened  (for example `HomeController.cs`) and when this project is initializing at the start, it freezes the whole IDE like this:

[![enter image description here][1]][1]


  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/wuZuH.png

(Some projects do not load)

After that, I have to kill the process. When I open VS again and fast click on another project (which is initializing) the freezing issue is gone. I have no idea what can cause a problem like this. I&#39;ve tried with and without ReSharper but I get the same result. Also, I restored default settings of VS. Also repaired whole VS.

Maybe someone had the same problem and could give some helpful advice?

Visual Studio freezing (crashing) while loading solution

I&#39;m getting the following error when running unit tests from visual studio using resharper: 

`Test-case objects missing for the following elements: ...  Rebuild the project and try again`

In the tooltip next to the unit test method it says: `Inconclusive: Test not run` and I think it said `Unit test skipped` at one point.  Resharper shows a grey eye icon.

There&#39;s also a wierd issue with visual studio&#39;s Test Explorer.  It won&#39;t show all my unit tests.  In fact, it&#39;s missing over 200 of my unit tests.  They just don&#39;t appear in the Test Explorer window.  I do have a handful of tests that appear and will run just fine.

Things I&#39;ve tried already: rebooting my machine, clean, rebuild, changing all dependent projects to use the same .net framework 4.7.

I&#39;m using VS 2017 .net Framework 4.7, Resharper, and MSTest.  All with the latest updates and versions.

Error when running unit tests in visual studio: Test-case objects missing

I have the following code snippet:

&lt;!-- language: c# --&gt;

    Expression&lt;Func&lt;TSource, TDest&gt;&gt; expression = model =&gt; new TDest{};
    // Result: {model =&gt; new TestModel(){}}

ReSharper refactors this snippet with `RedundantEmptyObjectOrCollectionInitializer` setting:

&lt;!-- language: c# --&gt;

    Expression&lt;Func&lt;TSource, TDest&gt;&gt; expression2 = model =&gt; new TDest();
    // Result: {model =&gt; new TestModel()}

After that, my code doesn&#39;t work. What influence do the curly braces have on initializing?&lt;BR /&gt;I found *[What is the Difference Between `new object()` and `new {}` in C#?][1]* on Stack Overflow, but both instances look equal.

`expression.GetType().ToString()` is equal to
`expression2.GetType().ToString()`

What is the difference between these initializations in expression trees?:

&lt;!-- language: c# --&gt;

    var a = model =&gt; new TDest{};
    var b = model =&gt; new TDest();

  [1]: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/17586525/what-is-the-difference-between-new-object-and-new-in-c



What is the difference between new Object() and new Object{} in expressions in C#

I have next method:

    public async Task&lt;IEnumerable&lt;Quote&gt;&gt; GetQuotesAsync()
    {
        using var connection = new SqlConnection(_connectionString);

        var allQuotes = await connection.QueryAsync&lt;Quote&gt;(@&quot;SELECT [Symbol], [Bid], [Ask], [Digits] FROM [QuoteEngine].[RealtimeData]&quot;);

        return allQuotes;
    }

Everything fine and clear, connection will be disposed at the end of scope.

But resharper suggests to change it to:

    public async Task&lt;IEnumerable&lt;Quote&gt;&gt; GetQuotesAsync()
    {
        await using var connection = new SqlConnection(_connectionString);

        var allQuotes = await connection.QueryAsync&lt;Quote&gt;(@&quot;SELECT [Symbol], [Bid], [Ask], [Digits] FROM [QuoteEngine].[RealtimeData]&quot;);

        return allQuotes;
    }

It adds await before using and code is compiled successfully. What does it mean and when do we need to do that?

Content Type	Original Author	Original Content on Stackoverflow
Question	Contango	View Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - Unit Testing	Contango	View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - Unit Testing	Alexander Pacha	View Answer on Stackoverflow

ReSharper Error: "The output has reached the limit and was truncated. To view the full output use 'Show Stack Trace in a new window' action."

Unit Testing Problem Overview

Update

Unit Testing Solutions

Solution 1 - Unit Testing

Solution 2 - Unit Testing

Package php5 have no installation candidate (Ubuntu 16.04)

How to disable user interaction while ProgressBar is visible in android?

Attributions