reshape vs. reshape2 in R

RReshapeReshape2

R Problem Overview


I am attempting to understand why development had shifted from reshape to reshape2 package. They seem to be functionally the same, however, I am unable to upgrade to reshape2 currently due to an older version of R running on the server. I am concerned about the possibility of a major bug that would have shifted development to a whole new package instead of simply continuing development of reshape. Does anyone know if there is a major flaw in the reshape package?

R Solutions


Solution 1 - R

reshape2 let Hadley make a rebooted reshape that was way, way faster, while avoiding busting up people's dependencies and habits.

https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-packages/2010/001169.html

> Reshape2 is a reboot of the reshape package. It's been over five years > since the first release of the package, and in that time I've learned > a tremendous amount about R programming, and how to work with data in > R. Reshape2 uses that knowledge to make a new package for reshaping > data that is much more focussed and much much faster. > > This version improves speed at the cost of functionality, so I have > renamed it to reshape2 to avoid causing problems for existing users. > Based on user feedback I may reintroduce some of these features. > > What's new in reshape2: > > * considerably faster and more memory efficient thanks to a much > better underlying algorithm that uses the power and speed of > subsetting to the fullest extent, in most cases only making a > single copy of the data. > > * cast is replaced by two functions depending on the output type: > dcast produces data frames, and acast produces matrices/arrays. > > * multidimensional margins are now possible: grand_row and > grand_col have been dropped: now the name of the margin refers to > the variable that has its value set to (all). > > * some features have been removed such as the | cast operator, and > the ability to return multiple values from an aggregation function. > I'm reasonably sure both these operations are better performed by > plyr. > > * a new cast syntax which allows you to reshape based on functions
> of variables (based on the same underlying syntax as plyr): > > * better development practices like namespaces and tests.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionAlexView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - RMatt ParkerView Answer on Stackoverflow