Push commits to another branch

Is it possible to commit and push changes from one branch to another.

Assume I commited changes in BRANCH1 and want to push them to BRANCH2.

From BRANCH1, is it valid to do:

git push origin **BRANCH2**

And then reset BRANCH1?

That will almost work.

When pushing to a non-default branch, you need to specify the source ref and the target ref:

git push origin branch1:branch2

Or

git push <remote> <branch with new changes>:<branch you are pushing to> 

Certainly, though it will only work if it's a fast forward of BRANCH2 or if you force it. The correct syntax to do such a thing is

git push <remote> <source branch>:<dest branch> 

See the description of a "refspec" on the git push man page for more detail on how it works. Also note that both a force push and a reset are operations that "rewrite history", and shouldn't be attempted by the faint of heart unless you're absolutely sure you know what you're doing with respect to any remote repositories and other people who have forks/clones of the same project.

It's very simple. Suppose that you have made changes to your Branch A which resides on both place locally and remotely but you want to push these changes to Branch B which doesn't exist anywhere.

Step-01: create and switch to the new branch B > git checkout -b B

Step-02: Add changes in the new local branch > git add . //or specific file(s)

Step-03: Commit the changes > git commit -m "commit_message"

Step-04: Push changes to the new branch B. The below command will create a new branch B as well remotely > git push origin B

Now, you can verify from bitbucket that the branch B will have one more commit than branch A. And when you will checkout the branch A these changes won't be there as these have been pushed into the branch B.

Note: If you have commited your changes into the branch A and after that you want to shift those changes into the new branch B then you will have to reset those changes first. #HappyLearning

I got a bad result with git push origin branch1:branch2 command:

In my case, branch2 is deleted and branch1 has been updated with some new changes.

Hence, if you want only the changes push on the branch2 from the branch1, try procedures below:

• On branch1: git add .

• On branch1: git commit -m 'comments'

• On branch1: git push origin branch1

• On branch2: git pull origin branch1

• On branch1: revert to the previous commit.

when you pushing code to another branch just follow the below git command. Remember demo is my other branch name you can replace with your branch name.

git push origin master:demo

In my case I had one local commit, which wasn't pushed to origin\master, but commited to my local master branch. This local commit should be now pushed to another branch.

With Git Extensions you can do something like this:

• (Create if not existing and) checkout new branch, where you want to push your commit.
• Select the commit from the history, which should get commited & pushed to this branch.
• Right click and select Cherry pick commit.
• Press Cherry pick button afterwards.
• The selected commit get's applied to your checked out branch. Now commit and push it.
• Check out your old branch, with the faulty commit.
• Hard reset this branch to the second last commit, where everything was ok (be aware what are you doing here!). You can do that via right click on the second last commit and select Reset current branch to here. Confirm the opperation, if you know what you are doing.

You could also do that on the GIT command line. Example copied from David Christensen:

> I think you'll find git cherry-pick + git reset to be a much > quicker workflow: > > Using your same scenario, with "feature" being the branch with the > top-most commit being incorrect, it'd be much easier to do this: > > git checkout master > git cherry-pick feature
> git checkout feature
> git reset --hard HEAD^ > > Saves quite a bit of work, and is the scenario that git cherry-pick > was designed to handle. > > I'll also note that this will work as well if it's not the topmost > commit; you just need a commitish for the argument to cherry-pick, > via: > > git checkout master
> git cherry-pick $sha1
> git checkout feature
> git rebase -i ... # whack the specific commit from the history

Props for the answer of @SLaks, that mostly works for me. But in the case that the branches have different heads. A convenient method is using cherry-pick.

1. git log - on Branch1 with your changes
2. copy commit SHA of your changes
3. git checkout branch2 - where to apply your changes
4. git cherry-pick SHA_OF_COMMIT_FROM_STEP_2

1. Commit your changes on BRANCH1.
2. Open terminal and enter the command -> "git push :"

Done.

For this question: the command is "

git push origin BRANCH1:BRANCH2

you can do this easily

git status
git add .
git commit -m "any commit"
git pull origin master 
git push origin master:development # assuming 'development' is the target branch name.

git init 
#git remote remove origin
git remote add origin  <http://...git>
echo "This is for demo" >> README.md 
git add README.md
git commit -m "Initail Commit" 
git checkout -b branch1 
git branch --list
****add files***
git add -A
git status
git commit -m "Initial - branch1"
git push --set-upstream origin branch1
#git push origin --delete  branch1
#git branch --unset-upstream  

You have committed to BRANCH1 and want to get rid of this commit without losing the changes? git reset is what you need. Do:

git branch BRANCH2

if you want BRANCH2 to be a new branch. You can also merge this at the end with another branch if you want. If BRANCH2 already exists, then leave this step out.

Then do:

git reset --hard HEAD~3

if you want to reset the commit on the branch you have committed. This takes the changes of the last three commits.

Then do the following to bring the resetted commits to BRANCH2

git checkout BRANCH2

This source was helpful: https://git-scm.com/docs/git-reset#git-reset-Undoacommitmakingitatopicbranch