Private module methods in Ruby

RubyPrivate MethodsAccess Specifier

Ruby Problem Overview


I have a two part question

Best-Practice

  • I have an algorithm that performs some operation on a data structure using the public interface
  • It is currently a module with numerous static methods, all private except for the one public interface method.
  • There is one instance variable that needs to be shared among all the methods.

These are the options I can see, which is the best?:

  • Module with static ('module' in ruby) methods
  • Class with static methods
  • Mixin module for inclusion into the data structure
  • Refactor out the part of the algorithm that modifies that data structure (very small) and make that a mixin that calls the static methods of the algorithm module

Technical part

Is there any way to make a private Module method?

module Thing
  def self.pub; puts "Public method"; end
  private
  def self.priv; puts "Private method"; end
end

The private in there doesn't seem to have any effect, I can still call Thing.priv without issue.

Ruby Solutions


Solution 1 - Ruby

I think the best way (and mostly how existing libs are written) to do this is by creating a class within the module that deals with all the logic, and the module just provides a convenient method, e.g.

module GTranslate
  class Translator
    def perform(text)
      translate(text)
    end

    private

    def translate(text)
      # do some private stuff here
    end
  end

  def self.translate(text)
    t = Translator.new
    t.perform(text)
  end
end

Solution 2 - Ruby

There's also Module.private_class_method, which arguably expresses more intent.

module Foo
  def self.included(base)
    base.instance_eval do
      def method_name
        # ...
      end
      private_class_method :method_name
    end
  end
end

For the code in the question:

module Thing
  def self.pub; puts "Public method"; end
  def self.priv; puts "Private method"; end
  private_class_method :priv
end

Ruby 2.1 or newer:

module Thing
  def self.pub; puts "Public method"; end
  private_class_method def self.priv; puts "Private method"; end
end

Solution 3 - Ruby

module Writer
  class << self
    def output(s)
      puts upcase(s)
    end

    private

    def upcase(s)
      s.upcase
    end
  end
end

Writer.output "Hello World"
# -> HELLO WORLD

Writer.upcase "Hello World"
# -> so.rb:16:in `<main>': private method `upcase' called for Writer:Module (NoMethodError)

Solution 4 - Ruby

You can use the "included" method to do fancy things when a module is mixed in. This does about what you want I think:

module Foo
  def self.included(base)
    class << base 
      def public_method
        puts "public method"
      end
      def call_private
        private_method
      end
      private
      def private_method
        puts "private"
      end
    end
  end
end

class Bar
  include Foo
end

Bar.public_method

begin
  Bar.private_method
rescue
  puts "couldn't call private method"
end

Bar.call_private

Solution 5 - Ruby

Unfortunately, private only applies to instance methods. The general way to get private "static" methods in a class is to do something like:

class << self
  private

  def foo()
   ....
  end
end

Admittedly I haven't played with doing this in modules.

Solution 6 - Ruby

A nice way is like this

module MyModule
  class << self
    def public_method
      # you may call the private method here
      tmp = private_method
      :public
    end

    private def private_method
      :private
    end
  end
end

# calling from outside the module
puts MyModule::public_method

Solution 7 - Ruby

This method won't allow sharing data with the private methods unless you explicitly pass the data by method parameters.

module Thing
  extend self

  def pub
    puts priv(123)
  end

  private
  
  def priv(value)
    puts "Private method with value #{value}"
  end
end

Thing.pub
# "Private method with value 123"

Thing.priv
# NoMethodError (private method `priv' called for Thing:Module)

Solution 8 - Ruby

What's about storing methods as lambdas within class variables/constants?

module MyModule
  @@my_secret_method = lambda {
    # ...
  }
  # ...
end

For test:
UPD: huge update of this code after 6 years shows cleaner way to declare private method d

module A
  @@L = lambda{ "@@L" }
  def self.a ; @@L[] ; end
  def self.b ; a ; end

  class << self
    def c ; @@L[] ; end
    private
    def d ; @@L[] ; end
  end
  def self.e ; c ; end
  def self.f ; self.c ; end
  def self.g ; d ; end
  def self.h ; self.d ; end

  private
  def self.i ; @@L[] ; end
  class << self
    def j ; @@L[] ; end
  end

  public
  def self.k ; i ; end
  def self.l ; self.i ; end
  def self.m ; j ; end
  def self.n ; self.j ; end
end

for expr in %w{ A.a A.b A.c A.d A.e A.f A.g A.h A.i A.j A.k A.l A.m A.n }
  puts "#{expr} => #{begin ; eval expr ; rescue => e ; e ; end}"
end

Here we see that:

A.a => @@L
A.b => @@L
A.c => @@L
A.d => private method `d' called for A:Module
A.e => @@L
A.f => @@L
A.g => @@L
A.h => private method `d' called for A:Module
A.i => @@L
A.j => @@L
A.k => @@L
A.l => @@L
A.m => @@L
A.n => @@L
  1. @@L can not be accesses from outside but is accessible from almost everywhere
  2. class << self ; private ; def successfully makes the method d inaccessible from outside and from inside with self. but not without it -- this is weird
  3. private ; self. and private ; class << self do not make methods private -- they are accessible both with and without self.

Solution 9 - Ruby

Make a private module or class

Constants are never private. However, it's possible to create a module or class without assigning it to a constant.

So an alternative to :private_class_method is to create a private module or class and define public methods on it.

module PublicModule
  def self.do_stuff(input)
    @private_implementation.do_stuff(input)
  end

  @private_implementation = Module.new do
    def self.do_stuff(input)
      input.upcase # or call other methods on module
    end
  end
end

Usage:

PublicModule.do_stuff("whatever") # => "WHATEVER"

See the docs for Module.new and Class.new.

Solution 10 - Ruby

Here's a solution for how you can have multiple classes nested within a single module, with the ability to call a private method on the module that's accessible from any of the nested classes, by making use of extend:

module SomeModule

  class ClassThatDoesNotExtendTheModule
    class << self
      def random_class_method
        private_class_on_module
      end
    end
  end

  class ClassThatDoesExtendTheModule
    extend SomeModule
  
    class << self
      def random_class_method
        private_class_on_module
      end
    end
  end

  class AnotherClassThatDoesExtendTheModule
    extend SomeModule
  
    class << self
      def random_class_method
        private_class_on_module
      end
    end
  end

  private

  def private_class_on_module
    puts 'some private class was called'
  end
  
end

Some output to show the solution in action:

> SomeModule::ClassThatDoesNotExtendTheModule.random_class_method

NameError: undefined local variable or method `private_class_on_module' for SomeModule::ClassThatDoesNotExtendTheModule:Class


> SomeModule::ClassThatDoesExtendTheModule.random_class_method

some private class was called


> SomeModule::ClassThatDoesExtendTheModule.private_class_on_module

NoMethodError: private method `private_class_on_module' called for SomeModule::ClassThatDoesExtendTheModule:Class


> SomeModule::AnotherClassThatDoesExtendTheModule.random_class_method

some private class was called


> SomeModule::AnotherClassThatDoesExtendTheModule.random_class_method

NoMethodError: private method `private_class_on_module' called for SomeModule::AnotherClassThatDoesExtendTheModule:Class

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionDaniel BeardsleyView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - RubyucronView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - RubyjfrenchView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - RubycdrevView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - RubyCameron PriceView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - RubyJ CooperView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - RubyTallak TveideView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - RubyGerry ShawView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - RubyNakilonView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - RubyNathan LongView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 10 - Rubyjeffdill2View Answer on Stackoverflow