PicklingError: Can't pickle <class 'decimal.Decimal'>: it's not the same object as decimal.Decimal

This is the error I got today at http://filmaster.com">filmaster.com</a>;: > python > PicklingError: Can't pickle <class > 'decimal.Decimal'>: it's not the same > object as decimal.Decimal >

What does that exactly mean? It does not seem to be making a lot of sense... It seems to be connected with django caching. You can see the whole traceback here:

>python > Traceback (most recent call last): > > File > "/home/filmaster/django-trunk/django/core/handlers/base.py", > line 92, in get_response response = > callback(request, *callback_args, > **callback_kwargs) > > File > "/home/filmaster/film20/film20/core/film_views.py", > line 193, in show_film > workflow.set_data_for_authenticated_user() > > File > "/home/filmaster/film20/film20/core/film_views.py", > line 518, in > set_data_for_authenticated_user > object_id = self.the_film.parent.id) > > File > "/home/filmaster/film20/film20/core/film_helper.py", > line 179, in get_others_ratings > set_cache(CACHE_OTHERS_RATINGS, > str(object_id) + "_" + str(user_id), > userratings) > > File > "/home/filmaster/film20/film20/utils/cache_helper.py", > line 80, in set_cache return > cache.set(CACHE_MIDDLEWARE_KEY_PREFIX > + full_path, result, get_time(cache_string)) > > File > "/home/filmaster/django-trunk/django/core/cache/backends/memcached.py", > line 37, in set > self._cache.set(smart_str(key), value, > timeout or self.default_timeout) > > File > "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/cmemcache.py", > line 128, in set val, flags = > self._convert(val) > > File > "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/cmemcache.py", > line 112, in _convert val = > pickle.dumps(val, 2) > > PicklingError: Can't pickle <class > 'decimal.Decimal'>: it's not the same > object as decimal.Decimal >

And the source code for Filmaster can be downloaded from here: http://bitbucket.org/filmaster/filmaster-test/">bitbucket.org/filmaster/filmaster-test</a>

Any help will be greatly appreciated.

I got this error when running in an jupyter notebook. I think the problem was that I was using %load_ext autoreload autoreload 2. Restarting my kernel and rerunning solved the problem.

One oddity of Pickle is that the way you import a class before you pickle one of it's instances can subtly change the pickled object. Pickle requires you to have imported the object identically both before you pickle it and before you unpickle it.

So for example:

from a.b import c
C = c()
pickler.dump(C)

will make a subtly different object (sometimes) to:

from a import b
C = b.c()
pickler.dump(C)

Try fiddling with your imports, it might correct the problem.

I will demonstrate the problem with simple Python classes in Python2.7:

In [13]: class A: pass  
In [14]: class B: pass

In [15]: A
Out[15]: <class __main__.A at 0x7f4089235738>

In [16]: B
Out[16]: <class __main__.B at 0x7f408939eb48>

In [17]: A.__name__ = "B"

In [18]: pickle.dumps(A)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PicklingError: Can't pickle <class __main__.B at 0x7f4089235738>: it's not the same object as __main__.B

This error is shown because we are trying to dump A, but because we changed its name to refer to another object "B", pickle is actually confused with which object to dump - class A or B. Apparently, pickle guys are very smart and they have already put a check on this behavior.

Solution: Check if the object you are trying to dump has conflicting name with another object.

I have demonstrated debugging for the case presented above with ipython and ipdb below:

PicklingError: Can't pickle <class __main__.B at 0x7f4089235738>: it's not the same object as __main__.B

In [19]: debug
> /<path to pickle dir>/pickle.py(789)save_global()
    787                 raise PicklingError(
    788                     "Can't pickle %r: it's not the same object as %s.%s" %
--> 789                     (obj, module, name))
    790
    791         if self.proto >= 2:

ipdb> pp (obj, module, name)               **<------------- you are trying to dump obj which is class A from the pickle.dumps(A) call.**
(<class __main__.B at 0x7f4089235738>, '__main__', 'B')
ipdb> getattr(sys.modules[module], name)   **<------------- this is the conflicting definition in the module (__main__ here) with same name ('B' here).**
<class __main__.B at 0x7f408939eb48>

I hope this saves some headaches! Adios!!

I can't explain why this is failing either, but my own solution to fix this was to change all my code from doing

from point import Point

to

import point

this one change and it worked. I'd love to know why... hth

There can be issues starting a process with multiprocessing by calling __init__. Here's a demo:

import multiprocessing as mp

class SubProcClass:
    def __init__(self, pipe, startloop=False):
        self.pipe = pipe
        if startloop:
            self.do_loop()

    def do_loop(self):
        while True:
            req = self.pipe.recv()
            self.pipe.send(req * req)

class ProcessInitTest:
    def __init__(self, spawn=False):
        if spawn:
            mp.set_start_method('spawn')
        (self.msg_pipe_child, self.msg_pipe_parent) = mp.Pipe(duplex=True)

    def start_process(self):
        subproc = SubProcClass(self.msg_pipe_child)
        self.trig_proc = mp.Process(target=subproc.do_loop, args=())
        self.trig_proc.daemon = True
        self.trig_proc.start()

    def start_process_fail(self):
        self.trig_proc = mp.Process(target=SubProcClass.__init__, args=(self.msg_pipe_child,))
        self.trig_proc.daemon = True
        self.trig_proc.start()

    def do_square(self, num):
        # Note: this is an synchronous usage of mp,
        # which doesn't make sense. But this is just for demo
        self.msg_pipe_parent.send(num)
        msg = self.msg_pipe_parent.recv()
        print('{}^2 = {}'.format(num, msg))

Now, with the above code, if we run this:

if __name__ == '__main__':
    t = ProcessInitTest(spawn=True)
    t.start_process_fail()
    for i in range(1000):
        t.do_square(i)

We get this error:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "start_class_process1.py", line 40, in <module>
    t.start_process_fail()
  File "start_class_process1.py", line 29, in start_process_fail
    self.trig_proc.start()
  File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.4/lib/python3.4/multiprocessing/process.py", line 105, in start
    self._popen = self._Popen(self)
  File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.4/lib/python3.4/multiprocessing/context.py", line 212, in _Popen
    return _default_context.get_context().Process._Popen(process_obj)
  File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.4/lib/python3.4/multiprocessing/context.py", line 274, in _Popen
    return Popen(process_obj)
  File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.4/lib/python3.4/multiprocessing/popen_spawn_posix.py", line 33, in __init__
    super().__init__(process_obj)
  File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.4/lib/python3.4/multiprocessing/popen_fork.py", line 21, in __init__
    self._launch(process_obj)
  File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.4/lib/python3.4/multiprocessing/popen_spawn_posix.py", line 48, in _launch
    reduction.dump(process_obj, fp)
  File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.4/lib/python3.4/multiprocessing/reduction.py", line 59, in dump
    ForkingPickler(file, protocol).dump(obj)
_pickle.PicklingError: Can't pickle <function SubProcClass.__init__ at 0x10073e510>: it's not the same object as __main__.__init__

And if we change it to use fork instead of spawn:

if __name__ == '__main__':
    t = ProcessInitTest(spawn=False)
    t.start_process_fail()
    for i in range(1000):
        t.do_square(i)

We get this error:

Process Process-1:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.4/lib/python3.4/multiprocessing/process.py", line 254, in _bootstrap
    self.run()
  File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.4/lib/python3.4/multiprocessing/process.py", line 93, in run
    self._target(*self._args, **self._kwargs)
TypeError: __init__() missing 1 required positional argument: 'pipe'

But if we call the start_process method, which doesn't call __init__ in the mp.Process target, like this:

if __name__ == '__main__':
    t = ProcessInitTest(spawn=False)
    t.start_process()
    for i in range(1000):
        t.do_square(i)

It works as expected (whether we use spawn or fork).

Did you somehow reload(decimal), or monkeypatch the decimal module to change the Decimal class? These are the two things most likely to produce such a problem.

Due to the restrictions based upon reputation I cannot comment, but the answer of Salim Fahedy and following the debugging-path set me up to identify a cause for this error, even when using dill instead of pickle: Under the hood, dill also accesses some functions of dill. And in pickle._Pickler.save_global() there is an import happening. To me it seems, that this is more of a "hack" than a real solution as this method fails as soon as the class of the instance you are trying to pickle is not imported from the lowest level of the package the class is in. Sorry for the bad explanation, maybe examples are more suitable:

The following example would fail:

from oemof import solph

...
(some code here, giving you the object 'es')
...

model = solph.Model(es)
pickle.dump(model, open('file.pickle', 'wb))

It fails, because while you can use solph.Model, the class actually is oemof.solph.models.Model for example. The save_global() resolves that (or some function before that which passes it to save_global()), but then imports Model from oemof.solph.models and throws an error, because it's not the same import as from oemof import solph.Model (or something like that, I'm not 100% sure about the workings).

The following example would work:

from oemof.solph.models import Model

...
some code here, giving you the object 'es')
...

model = Model(es)
pickle.dump(model, open('file.pickle', 'wb'))

It works, because now the Model object is imported from the same place, the pickle._Pickler.save_global() imports the comparison object (obj2) from.

Long story short: When pickling an object, make sure to import the class from the lowest possible level.

Addition: This also seems to apply to objects stored in the attributes of the class-instance you want to pickle. If for example model had an attribute es that itself is an object of the class oemof.solph.energysystems.EnergySystem, we would need to import it as:

from oemof.solph.energysystems import EnergySystem

es = EnergySystem()

My issue was that I had a function with the same name defined twice in a file. So I guess it was confused about which one it was trying to pickle.

Same happened to me

Restarting the kernel worked for me

I had same problem while debugging (Spyder). Everything worked normally if run the program. But, if I start to debug I faced the picklingError.

But, once I chose the option Execute in dedicated console in Run configuration per file (short-cut: ctrl+F6) everything worked normally as expected. I do not know exactly how it is adapting.

Note: In my script I have many imports like

from PyQt5.QtWidgets import *
from PyQt5.Qt import *
from matplotlib.backends.backend_qt5agg import FigureCanvasQTAgg as FigureCanvas
import os, sys, re, math

My basic understanding was, because of star (*) I was getting this picklingError.

I had a problem that no one has mentioned yet. I have a package with a __init__ file that does, among other things:

from .mymodule import cls

Then my top-level code says:

import mypkg
obj = mypkg.cls()

The problem with this is that in my top-level code, the type appears to be mypkg.cls, but it's actually mypkg.mymodule.cls. Using the full path:

obj = mypkg.mymodule.cls()

avoids the error.

I had the same error in Spyder. Turned out to be simple in my case. I defined a class named "Class" in a file also named "Class". I changed the name of the class in the definition to "Class_obj". pickle.dump(Class_obj,fileh) works, but pickle.dump(Class,fileh) does not when its saved in a file named "Class".