Pass In "WHERE" parameters to PostgreSQL View?

SqlPostgresqlStored ProceduresView

Sql Problem Overview


I have a rather complicated query on my PostgreSQL database spanning 4 tables via a series of nested subqueries. However, despite the slightly tricky looking appearance and setup, ultimately it will return two columns (from the same table, if that helps the situation) based on that matching of two external parameters (two strings need to match with fields in different tables). I'm fairly new to database design in PostgreSQL, so I know that this seemingly magical thing called Views exist, and that seems like it could help me here, but perhaps not.

Is there some way I can move my complex query inside a view and somehow just pass it the two values I need to match? That would greatly simplify my code on the front-end (by shifting the complexities to the database structure). I can create a view that wraps my static example query, and that works just fine, however that only works for one pair of string values. I need to be able to use it with a variety of different values.

Thus my question is: is it possible to pass parameters into an otherwise static View and have it become "dynamic"? Or perhaps a View is not the right way to approach it. If there's something else that would work better, I'm all ears!

**Edit: ** As requested in comments, here's my query as it stands now:

SELECT   param_label, param_graphics_label
  FROM   parameters
 WHERE   param_id IN 
         (SELECT param_id 
            FROM parameter_links
           WHERE region_id = 
                 (SELECT region_id
                    FROM regions
                   WHERE region_label = '%PARAMETER 1%' AND model_id =
                         (SELECT model_id FROM models WHERE model_label = '%PARAMETER 2%')
                 )
         ) AND active = 'TRUE'
ORDER BY param_graphics_label;

Parameters are set off by percent symbols above.

Sql Solutions


Solution 1 - Sql

You could use a set returning function:

create or replace function label_params(parm1 text, parm2 text)
  returns table (param_label text, param_graphics_label text)
as
$body$
  select ...
  WHERE region_label = $1 
     AND model_id = (SELECT model_id FROM models WHERE model_label = $2)
  ....
$body$
language sql;

Then you can do:

select *
from label_params('foo', 'bar')

Btw: are you sure you want:

AND model_id = (SELECT model_id FROM models WHERE model_label = $2)

if model_label is not unique (or the primary key) then this will throw an error eventually. You probably want:

AND model_id IN (SELECT model_id FROM models WHERE model_label = $2)

Solution 2 - Sql

In addition to what @a_horse already cleared up, you could simplify your SQL by using JOIN syntax instead of nested subqueries. Performance will be similar, but the syntax is much shorter and easier to manage.

CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION param_labels(_region_label text, _model_label text)
  RETURNS TABLE (param_label text, param_graphics_label text) AS
$func$
	SELECT p.param_label, p.param_graphics_label
	FROM   parameters      p 
	JOIN   parameter_links l USING (param_id)
	JOIN   regions         r USING (region_id)
	JOIN   models          m USING (model_id)
	WHERE  p.active
	AND    r.region_label = $1 
	AND    m.model_label = $2
	ORDER  BY p.param_graphics_label;
$func$ LANGUAGE sql;
  • If model_label is not unique or something else in the query produces duplicate rows, you may want to make that SELECT DISTINCT p.param_graphics_label, p.param_label - with a matching ORDER BY clause for best performance. Or use a GROUP BY clause.

  • Since Postgres 9.2 you can use the declared parameter names in place of $1 and $2 in SQL functions. (Has been possible for PL/pgSQL functions for a long time).

  • Care must be taken to avoid naming conflicts. That's why I make it a habit to prefix parameter names in the declaration (those are visible most everywhere inside the function) and table-qualify column names in the body.

  • I simplified WHERE p.active = 'TRUE' to WHERE p.active, because the column active should most probably be of type boolean, not text.

  • USING only works if the column names are unambiguous across all tables to the left of the JOIN. Else you have to use the more explicit syntax:
    ON l.param_id = p.param_id

Solution 3 - Sql

In most cases the set-returning function is the way to go, but in the event that you want to both read and write to the set, a view may be more appropriate. And it is possible for a view to read a session parameter:

CREATE VIEW widget_sb AS
  SELECT * FROM widget
  WHERE column = cast(current_setting('mydomain.myparam') as int)

SET mydomain.myparam = 0
select * from widget_sb
[results]

SET mydomain.myparam = 1
select * from widget_sb
[distinct results]

Solution 4 - Sql

I don't think a "dynamic" view as you stated is possible.

Why not write a stored procedure that takes 2 arguments instead?

Solution 5 - Sql

I would rephrase the query as the following:

SELECT   p.param_label, p.param_graphics_label
  FROM   parameters p
where exists (
    select 1
    from parameter_links pl
    where pl.parameter_id = p.id
    and exists (select 1 from regions r where r.region_id = pl.region_id
) and p.active = 'TRUE'
order by p.param_graphics_label;

Assuming that you have indexes on the various id columns, this query should be significantly faster than using the IN operator; the exists parameters here will use only the index values without even touching the data table except for getting the final data from the parameters table.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionDevinView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - Sqla_horse_with_no_nameView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - SqlErwin BrandstetterView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - SqlDrewView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - SqlJin KimView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - SqlMontyView Answer on Stackoverflow